The Radical He Rant And Rage; Singing Someone's Got To Turn The Page (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Throwin' Stones"

          What is the difference between a Believer and a Zealot?  Perhaps it depends on who is looking. When describing one’s self and dedication to a movement, one usually sees him/herself and fellow members of that group as Believers. Zealots are the extremists on the other side. Certainly, both Believers and Zealots believe in the “goodness”, the “holiness” or the “correctness” of their belief system. Maybe the difference between a Believer and a Zealot is the treatment of the “Other”.   Perhaps the most difficult task of any belief system is to acknowledge zealotry within one’s belief system. However, the sustainability of every belief system, whether it be social, religious, or political is the ability of that belief system to recognize that perhaps the belief system itself creates an environment for zealotry, eliminate that environment, and then isolate the zealots until there is a realization that zealotry ultimately fails. History has witnessed the eventual irrelevance of numerous belief systems that have gone the way of the Zealot eventually turning on themselves: The Montagnards during the Reign of Terror, Mao's Cultural Revolution. There were religious zealots that contributed to the religious wars between Catholics and Protestants and Sunnis and Shia. There are zealots who have killed and threatened abortion providers. Interestingly enough, there are no cases of zealots who harm those who hold anti-abortion or anti-choice positions.  

          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. Pinchas came to our attention last week when at the conclusion of Parsha Balak, he threw a spear at Zimri the son of the head of the Tribe of Shimon (one of the Twelve Tribes), and Cozbi, a Midianite princess, while they were co-habiting. At the time, there was a plague that was wiping out B’nai Yisroel because of their relationship with the Midianite women and worshipping the Midianite/Moabite God Baal Peor. Pinchas put an end to it by killing Zimri and Cozbi. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. God commands a new census be taken. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad, and they make the case that they should inherit their father’s tribal lands. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc). Then God also tells Moshe Rabeinu that his time as leader and in fact his life is quickly drawing to a close and that he should put his affairs in order and name a new leader (27:12-18). Joshua becomes the designated future leader.

          It appears that God offered a reward to Pinchas.  Pinchas Ben Elazar Ben Aharon HaKohen Heishiv et Chamati Mei’Al B’nai Yisroel B’Kano et Kinati B’TOcham V'Lo ChiLiTi et B’nai Yisroel B’Kinati – Pinchas son of Elazar son of Aharon the Kohen, tuned back My wrath from upon the Children of Israel when he zealously avenged My vengeance, among them, so I did not consume the Children of Israel in my vengeance. Lachen Emor Hinneni Notein Lo et Briti Shalom – Therefore, say: Behold! I give him My covenant of peace. V’Haitaha Lo U’LeZaro Acharav Brit Kehunat Olam Tachat Asher Kinei Leilohav VaYiChaPeR Al B’Nai Yisroel – And it shall be for him and his offspring after him a covenant of eternal priesthood because he took vengeance for his God, and he atoned for the Children of Israel. (Num. 25:11-13) Certainly, on a superficial level, it appears that because of Pinchas’ zealous defending of God and God’s Torah, he receives something, a Brit Shalom. The sages in the Jerusalem Talmud state that Pinchas's act of vigilante justice did not meet the approval of Moshe or the elders. In fact, they wanted to excommunicate him until then God stepped in and said that the line of Pinchas would be the line of the Kohen Gadol. Here is a belief system recognizing the dangers of the Zealot and suggesting that the only way to deal with the Zealot is ex-communication. So how do we make sense of God’s apparent reward for Pinchas’ zealous behavior? The  NeTziV (Rabbi Naphtali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin 19th Century Poland and Rosh Yeshiva of the Volozhin Yeshiva) offers a fascinating insight and explanation. The Brit Shalom The Covenant of Peace, was not given to protect Pinchas from those wishing to avenge Zimri’s murder, nor was it a reward for the purity of heart that some sages explained was necessary to ‘defend Hashem’.  Keeping in mind that the plague ceased, and lives were saved, The NeTziV comments “In reward for turning away the wrath of the HaKadosh Baruch Hu [God], He blessed Pinchas with the attribute of peace, that he should not be quick-tempered or angry anymore. Since it was only natural that such a deed as Pinchas’ should leave in his heart intense emotional unrest afterward, the Divine blessing was designed to cope with this situation and promised peace and tranquility of soul.” By becoming the eventual Kohen Gadol, Pinchas would have to pursue peace and compromise like his grandfather Aharon. In order to pursue peace like his grandfather, Pinchas will have to see both sides and neither side can be viewed as “other”. Pinchas will now have to learn patience, and understanding in order to recognize the intricacies of the law and sacrificial offerings. Perhaps most important, Pinchas will have to recognize his own fallibility and work on himself instead of harming others. 

          So Pinchas wasn’t rewarded per se. Instead, he would be a reminder that Judaism abhors zealotry and vigilanteism.  There is no place for it.  Before he does, Moshe will implore this new generation preparing to enter into Canaan, that God’s path is neither to the right nor to the left but rather the middle path (Deut. 5:29-30). Judaism doesn’t reward Zealots. Instead, Judaism recognizes that zealousness is a sickness. It is a spiritual sickness or perversion of belief. As a result, the soul within requires healing, the soul needs Shalom - Peace.

Peace,
Rav Yitz 

There's A Fear Down Here We Can't Forget, Hasn't Got A Name Just Yet, Always Awake Always Around (John Barlow & Bob Weir- "Throwing Stones")

           For the past couple of weeks,  after dinner, my wife will go onto her social media, become visibly upset and report to me and our son the numerous Anti-Semitic attacks that have occurred. My son and I have sent the New York Times, The Times of Israel, and Washington Post Op-Ed pieces from Brett Stephens and Tom Friedman to our family "chat". This current round of Anti-Semitic attacks has come from those who view the conflict between Israel and Hamas in terms of racial justice, minority rights, and the “woke Left”. From this perspective, Hamas is an organization of “freedom fighters'' with no alternative but to respond to Israel's treatment of Palestinians except through justified violence. This lens conveniently leaves out an important but inconvenient truth; Hamas is a fundamentalist Islamic terrorist organization that routinely persecutes Gays and Lesbians, enslaves its citizens to build tunnels, and hides behind civilians and civilian institutions such as mosques, hospitals, and schools in order to launch its rockets and carry out its terrorist agenda. Regarding Israel, Hamas only desires Israel’s destruction and a Palestinian homeland that adheres to strict Islamic law.  Indeed the anti-semitic attacks from the “woke Left" have managed to conflate anti -Zionism and Anti-semitism.  Earlier this week,  a U.S. Congresswoman from Georgia compared the rules for mask-wearing similar to the Nazis making Jews wear a “gold” star. By the way, she is the same Georgia Congresswoman who claimed that the wildfires from last autumn were a result of an outer-space laser beam created by and controlled by Jews.   A few years ago, Nazis marched in Charlottesville, Virginia. There were Anti-Semitic attacks in Pittsburgh, outside of San Diego, in New Jersey. These comments, these attacks had very little to do with Israel, but everything to do with Jews as “other”, part of a conspiratorial group that runs the media, controls international finance and is a threat to the right-wing White Christian world. Extremism on the Left and extremism on the Right extremely is bad for the Jews and bad for Israel.  Indeed, extremism is a darkness that allows Anti Semitism to grow and thrive.

          This week we read the third Parsha from The Book of Numbers, Parsha BeHA'alotcha. In the previous two parshiot: Bemidbar and Naso, B’nai Yisroel takes a census and prepares for its upcoming journey from Sinai to Eretz Canaan. This week, the final preparations are ordered and executed and the departure from Sinai begins. Aaron, Moshe’s brother and the Kohen Gadol, lights the lamp for the Mishkan, the entire Levite tribe is purified, offerings made and their service for maintenance of the Mishkan begins. Final instructions for observing Pesach under these new conditions, (they were not leaving Egypt anymore nor had they arrived in the land) were offered, including the case of coming into contact with the deceased and becoming spiritually impure. The narrative tells us the manner in which B’nai Yisroel traveled: sheltered by a cloud during the day and protected by a pillar of fire at night. Then the complaining begins. They complain about the Mannah. They complain about the food. They complain about Moshe’s leadership. Moshe’s sister complains about his wife.

          The first few verses, from which the Parsha gets its name BeHA'alotcha seem rather disconnected from the rest of the narrative. B’Ha’Alotcha et HaNeirot El Mul P’nei HaM’norah Ya’Iru Shivat Ha’Neirot - When you kindle the lamps, toward the face of the Menorah shall seven lamps cast light (Num. 8:2)  According to Rashi, the flames on either side of the middle are bent towards the middle, and the middle flame burns brightest and longest.  Aaron is given the job to light the Menorah, the Neir Tamid, the eternal light, every day. According to the Talmud in Menachot 88, Aaron didn’t just light the Menorah, he had to clean the seven lamps out every morning prior to lighting the lamps. He would have to lean it over to clean it and the stand of the Menorah back up prior to lighting, thus ensuring complete functionality: Ya’Iru Shivat HaNeirot - so that the seven lamps will cast light (Num. 8:2) If only six of the seven lamps function properly, Aaron will not have fulfilled the commandment. Why is it necessary to make sure that all seven lamps are fully functional and lit? Will one unlit lamp on the candelabra really make a difference in terms of light? Rabbi Isaac Luria, “The Arizal”,  a 16th-century mystic, explained that the central shaft of the seven-branched candelabra (menorah) represents God’s divine light as manifest in Torah. The three branches on either side of God’s Torah represent science and other academic pursuits such as philosophy, and theology. For Sforno, the great Italian Renaissance biblical commentator, the right three branches symbolize the pursuit of enlightenment through spiritual endeavors and the left three branches symbolize the pursuit of enlightenment through secular and worldly knowledge. Like The Arizal, Sforno interprets the middle trunk of the Menorah to be the Divine Light of God, as illuminated throughout creation, and as a result, all the other flame leaned toward this Divine primordial light of the middle branch.

            By fulfilling the mitzvah of the Menorah, and making sure it was completely lit each and every day, Aharon understood what it meant to be a light to the people. Knowledge and enlightenment embrace both the Holy and the Secular, as does a complete and meaningful life. Like Aaron, the High Priest, the Jewish people are supposed to be  “a light unto the world”, a “nation of priests”. Judaism has a long history of being “woke”. Judaism is the original “truth to power”, and has always challenged authority and the status quo. The very foundation of Judaism is a response to extremism. Regarding the Torah, Jews are reminded to avoid drifting too far to the left and too far to the right, but rather stick to the middle (Deut. 28:14). Indeed, it seems that Judaism is the ultimate “canary in the coal mine” when it comes to mankind’s darkest recesses of the soul, inhabited by hate, extremism (political or religious), fanaticism, ignorance, and self-loathing. Perhaps the only response to Anti-Semitism is to continue lighting the seven branches of the Menorah and shining the light of Godliness upon those who are surrounded by the darkness of hate, extremism, and fanaticism.

 Peace,
 Rav Yitz

Full Of Hope, Full Of Grace Is The Human Face (John Barlow & Bob Weir- "Throwing Stones")

           Earlier this week, the Jewish People celebrated Shavuot, the Feast of Weeks, the celebration of the Giving of the Torah. A synagogue ritual that normally occurs on Shavuot, as well as on  Pesach and Sukkot, is the ceremony known as Duchening. The Kohanim of the congregation stand upon the bimah and with Talis covering them, and bestow a blessingknown as Birkat Kohanim upon the congregation. In Israel, the Duchening ceremony occurs every Shabbat. On Friday night, before sitting down to the Shabbat dinner, it is traditional for the father to give the Birkat Kohanim upon his children.  Many years ago, I attended  a wedding and  a baptism in a Catholic church.  During both ceremonies the Catholic Priest invoked the words of the Birkat Kohanim, both in Latin and English. When I made the Birkat Kohanim this past Friday, our dinner discussion included the recent events in Gaza and Hamas’ continued rocket fire targeting Israeli citizens. Even more disturbing than Hamas’ rocket fire has been the street violence that occurred in Lod, Haifa, and other Israeli towns where Israeli Jews and Israeli Arabs live near each other.  Our son asked if there was an Islamic equivalent of Birkat Kohanim that a parent offers his/her child, or to the community for that matter. I explained that I did not know. I assumed that there is probably a blessing that a parent gives a child but I did not think that such a placing was also the same as a “Priestly Benediction” since Islam did not have “priests” like Judaism or Christianity. 

          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Naso. The Parsha’s 176 psukim make it among the longest single parshiot in the entire Torah.  Its length is also reflected in the wide variety of topics covered including the census for the tribe of Levi - the Priestly tribe, the responsibilities for the maintenance and operation of the Mishkan, the purification of the camp,  the treatment of the wayward wife (the Sotah), the vow of the Nazir (a vow that limits the behavior of the individual as a means of elevating oneself to a higher level of holiness for only a limited time),  the identical tribal offerings made by each leader in order on twelve successive days. This ritual offering celebrated the fact that the Mishkan was “open for business”. Inserted into these seemingly disparate rules and narratives are the priestly benedictions. A quick glance at the different components of Parsha Naso suggests that each blessing is connected to the other by focusing upon the image and the theme of Naso – “lift up” or "raise up". Indeed, each of the three blessings focuses upon the idea of  issues of spiritually uplifting our souls, spiritually uplifting  ourselves in holiness. We accomplish this either through our own actions or the actions of the other.

          The Priestly benediction is an example of a third party elevating us, or at least offering supplication to God on our behalf that we indeed are worthy of blessing.  From that perspective, I can’t imagine a more powerful ritual for parents to do with their children. Yevarechecha Adoshem VaYishmarecha, May Hashem bless you and keep you. Ya' eir Adoshem Panav Eilecha VaYichuneka, May Hashem make His face shine upon you and be gracious to you Yisa Adoshem Panav Eilecha VaYaSem Lecha Shalom May Hashem lift his countenance upon you and give you peace. ( Num 6:24-26). What does it mean that God should “keep" our children or “guard” our children? Naturally, as parents invoking Hashem to protect our children seems like a great idea given all the tsuris in the world. Yet Rashi, the great 11th-century French commentator explains that this first blessing is not an expression of  Hashem protecting our children. Rather the “blessing” expresses a blessing that had already been enumerated in the Torah, namely, that our children should be materially well off. Also we ask that Hashem (the loving and kind aspect of God) should “protect” our children and their material blessings from those who might usurp such a blessing. The second blessing which speaks of “shining Hashem’s face upon” our child expresses our desire for our children to become enlightened by Torah and experience a meaningful relationship with Hashem. The “gracious” is the subliminal understanding that we can only request that our children have an intellectual and spiritual ability to learn Torah and connect to Hashem. We hope Hashem was gracious in giving our children plenty of ability to be worthy enough to receive such “light”.  The third blessing is perhaps the most relevant for parents and children. Rashi explains that “lifting His countenance to you” means that Hashem should suppress His anger. One could also understand that the light or the enlightenment we seek is God's gift raising his face up towards us. With God's countenance before us, we sense God's love and we are able to cast aside or let go of our anger and hatred. Only after we, only after our children are capable of casting aside their anger and hatred will our souls be complete, whole and at peace in this world.  Both interpretations suggest that we hope and pray that our children are at spiritual peace, their souls will be  Shaleim, to be whole and complete. Anger and hatred prevent Shleimah – wholeness, harmony, peace.

          I thought about our son’s question, I thought about my own childhood dutifully walking towards my father and receiving this blessing. I thought about the blessing itself with its invocation of peace, of God’s shining his glory about the person receiving the blessing. I thought about God raising his face towards the person receiving the blessing.  I remain unfamiliar with any equivalent in Islam where a priest stands before the community and issues Birkat Kohanim - a “Priestly Benediction”  or an equivalent. To this day, I can’t imagine why parents in Gaza, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, or mixed Israeli Arab and Jewish neighborhoods (Haifa for example) would listen to Hamas and place their children in harm’s way. I can’t imagine hating so much that I am willing to harm my own children in order to feed that hatred. I thought about the words that Golda Meir purportedly said: ”Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us.”  When the Palestinian people stop listening to Hamas, when they stand up to Hamas rather than offer their own children to Hamas’ hatred, then Israel will know there is a partner for peace in Gaza.  

Peace,
Rav Yitz 

But The Darkness Never Goes From Some Men's Eyes (John Barlow & Bob Weir ("Throwing Stones")

           A month after joining a Trump supporting mob riot at the U.S. Capitol building,  Canada declared that the Proud Boys a domestic terrorist organization. Like other white supremacists, fascist groups, the Proud boys peddle militant Christianity, white supremacy, and fascist ideology fomenting conspiracy, hate, and disinformation about Jews,  people of color, women, and the growing multiculturalism of North America. Ironically, the U.S. government which was attached on that horrific day has not yet placed this organization on a terrorist watch list. Instead, the Canadian government appreciates and understands the threat to liberal democracies posed by hate-based organizations that peddle conspiracy theories and prejudice against immigrants, people of colour, Jews, and anyone who is different. Indeed, laws tell a lot about the values and the courage of a society.

          This week we read from Parsha Mishpatim. Moshe is still at Mt. Sinai. However, the revelation that occurred with the giving of the Aseret Dibrot (Ten Commandments) has come and gone. Instead, God  gives Moshe numerous laws that affect the day to day issues raised by human interaction. There is no shofar blowing, there is no anticipation of meeting God at the mountain. Rather there is only God telling Moshe how to decide various legal matters including the damages to be paid if my ox gores your ox; two men are fighting near a pregnant woman and she gets hurt,   and how to treat to a Jewish servant, observing festivals, the issues of liability for those who are asked to safeguard another’s property as well as manslaughter, to name just a few of the fifty-three commandments (according to the Sefer HaChinuch).  Moshe tells these laws to B’nai Yisroel and they respond with the words Naaseh v’Nishmah – we will do and learn.  The Parsha concludes with glowing fire upon the Mountain that Moshe ascends once again.

          Following the awe-inspiring revelation at Sinai in Parsha Yitro, it might seem like a spiritual let down to read of one law after another and the mundane rules that are established to govern human interaction. However, buried beneath these rules and regulations God reminds Moshe of the foundations upon which these executive orders are based.  V’Ger Lo Toneh  V’Lo TilChatzenu Ki Geirim Heyitem B’Eretz Mitzrayim – You shall not taunt or oppress a stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. The Talmudic Sages in Baba Metzia 59b remind us that the Torah expresses caution regarding the treatment of the stranger no less than thirty-six times. No other “executive order”, no other commandment such as loving God, Shabbat, circumcision, forbidden foods, uttering a falsehood occurs as frequently as the refrain to love the stranger or refrain to avoid oppressing the stranger.  The Talmudic sages define the “stranger” to be the idol worshipper turned proselyte. Once the “stranger” ceases worshipping idols and begins the process of Torah study; no one should oppress, mock or demean the proselyte’s origins. In a sense, the Sages consider the “stranger” to be spiritually defenseless. Later Medieval Commentators explain that the “stranger” is not only an idol worshipper turned proselyte (the spiritually defenseless), but the economically defenseless as well. RaShBam (11th Century French commentator and Rashi’s nephew) clarifies “Do not oppress him” to mean that you should not force him to do your work since he has no champion. RaMBaM, the great Spanish commentator, adds a caveat to RaShBam. God defends the defenseless. God protects the widows and the orphans. In the previous Parsha, Yitro, God reminded Moshe to tell B’nai Yisroel that they were to be a Nation of Priests, that is to say, B’nai Yisroel is supposed to embody Godliness here on earth. Caring for the stranger embodies Godliness. Failure to care for the stranger embodies the Egyptians.  

  The laws in Mishpatim and the laws of any country reflects that society’s underlying concern of human relationships and the sanctity of human relationships. It is human nature to fear the “other”, to fear the “stranger”, to fear those who look different.  Torah, Judeo-Christian morality, liberal democracy, appeal to something that transcends human nature. Instead, we are supposed to strive for something greater than human nature. We are supposed to transcend our fear of the stranger. We are supposed to transcend our trepidation of the “other”. Parsha Mishpatim reminds B’nai Yisroel that of all people, the Jewish people should be able to empathize with the stranger. After all, at numerous points in Jewish history, we were all strangers.   The laws presented in Parsha Mishpatim demonstrate how former slaves created a civil, just, caring, and humane society predicated upon the law, trust, the sanctity of the human soul, and the necessity for empathy. Indeed, for its time, it truly was revolutionary. 

Peace,

Rav Yitz

But The Darkness Never Goes From Some Men's Eyes (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Throwing Stones")

Why did he have to do that? Why did Trump invoke Israel and antisemitism when siting four Democratic Congresswoman of color as, Socialist, haters of America and finally telling them to “go back where they came from” if they hate America so much? I am not a fan of three of the four congresswomen. I don’t like Ocasio-Cortez; I don’t Tlaib, and I don’t like Omar. I don’t like their policies regarding Israel, I don’t appreciate their comments regarding Jews and Israel. I also know that I would never have voted for them. They are 4 votes in the Democratic Caucus and if they were smart and so politically astute, they would focus more on keeping quiet,  trusting Nancy Pelosi, and focus on getting rid of Trump, rather making provocative statements on Twitter in order to get more followers.  However, of all people to use  Israel and Anti-semitism as a standard when trying to find a convenient political target to replace Hilary Clinton and “Lock her up”.  Trump was the guy who managed to find moral relativism in Charlottesville. Trump and his anti-immigration, pro-conspiracy international kabal inspired a gunman to kill Jews in Pittsburgh, and inspire another crackpot to manufacture pipe bombs and send them to at least two Jewish liberal billionaires who support left-wing liberal causes.  Trump is the guy that racists love. Trump is the guy that Neo-Nazi and white supremacists love. Trump is the guy that is praised by David Duke. So why did the guy that white supremacists and neo-Nazis love so much, why did he need to cite ‘anti-semitism’ and ‘love for Israel’ as part of his “America, love it or leave it” racial scree? Make no mistake, I can’t tell you how many observant Jews have said, “you know the President is right, they (the four freshman Democratic congresswomen of color) are anti-semitic and anti-Israel.”  I wince as I remind them of Charlottesville, Pittsburgh, and Poway because I understand that Trump has managed to weaponized Israel and Anti- Semitism among Jews, thereby making the Jewish community even more disunified.

                 This Shabbat we read from Parsha Balak. Balak was a Moabite King. After watching what B’nai Yisroel had done to the Ammonites, Balak was distressed. He realized that fighting B’nai Yisroel with a regular army was doomed to fail because he realized that God had blessed them. Being a clever king, Balak surmised that the only way to fight B'nai Yisroel was to fight them on a spiritual level. Since God blessed Bnai Yisroel, Balak wanted to find someone to curse them. There lived a prophet, a “Prophet Consultant,” a “hired gun” if you will, named Bilaam. King Balak hired Bilaam to curse B’nai Yisroel. Bilaam is visited by God and told not to curse B’nai Yisroel. Bilaam ignores the visitation. On his donkey heading towards B’nai Yisroel’s camp, and preparing his curses, the donkey stops. Although Bilaam could not see the angel standing in the middle of the road with a sword drawn, the donkey did. As a result, the donkey refused to continue forward. Finally, Bilaam realizes that there is a divine force in the middle of the road and must confront it. Bilaam listens and heads toward the camp. Looking down upon the encampment, Bilaam blesses B’nai Yisroel with words that we say upon entering into any synagogue, words that we teach our children at the youngest of ages. Ma Tovu Ohalecha Yaakov Mishkenotecha Yisroel – How goodly are your tents, O Jacob, your dwelling places O Israel – Kinchalim Nitayu K’ganot Alei Nahar K’Ahalim Natah Adoshem Ka’Arazim Alei Mayim – stretching out like brooks like gardens by the river, like aloes planted by Hashem, like cedars by the water (Num 24:5-6). Try as he might, Bilaam is unable to curse Bnai Yisroel, rather he blesses them.

The Jewish people always have one or two questions when assessing people and governments. “Is it good for the Jews? Is it good for Israel?” Obviously, depending on the definition of “good”, the answer will vary. Also depending on which version of Israel matters, democracy or Jewish,  the answer may vary. Even how one understands “Jew” will cause the answer to the question, “is it good for the Jews” to vary. Certainly, Bilaam must be good for the Jews. Yes, he may have started off as wanting to curse the Jews, but that was because Balak hired him to do it. In the end, he not only offered a blessing, but we invoke that blessing every morning. Mah Tovu Ohalecha Yaakov – How Goodly are your tents O Israel. Those words of praise must be good for the Jews and good for Israel, right? Bilaam can’t be such a bad guy. No, the real bad guy must be Balak, the king of Moab, he is the guy that wants to curse Israel.  In the Talmud, Tractate Taanit 20a, R’ Samuel Bar Nachmani, suggests that the blessing isn’t really such a blessing. Bilaam invoked the mighty Cedar by the river when he blessed the Jews. Cedars do not grow in well-watered areas, its stock does not drive up new shoots and it has few roots. A wind from the South will uproot the Cedar and lay it flat on its face. Soon after this episode of Bilaam blessing B’nai Yisroel, he will devise the plan for Balak’s attempt to destroy B’nai Yisroel. It is Bilaam who brings the daughters of Moab in order to entice the men of B’nai Yisroel so that they begin acting like Moabites and the other idol-worshipping nations and dividing a nation.  So maybe Bilaam is not such a friend to the Jews after all.

                How bad is Trump for the Jews and Israel? He is awful. I don’t want Israel to be political fodder for the Republicans or Democrats. Support for Israel is in America’s best interests. When Israel gets weaponized by one political party against another, it is bad for Israel and it’s bad for the Jews. That’s how a right-wing, anti-immigration anti semite walked into a synagogue in Pittsburgh and started shooting. That is how and anti-semite, who believes that there is an international conspiracy taking over the world, walked into a synagogue in Poway and began shooting. Yes, it’s bad for the Jews because Trump and his weaponization of Israel and Jews create additional rifts within a Jewish community that will always be divided because of observance. It’s bad for Israel because it creates increased alienation between it and the less observant diaspora Jews. This phenomenon is played it in terms of generations and observance and contributes to the concern why Israel receives tepid support if any from the young, non-observant Jews. So regarding four woman of color, one of whom represents a district that historically was a Jewish neighborhood in Minneapolis, they are four women with four votes in Congress. They can have a twitter following of millions and millions but, only the people in their district can vote for them. So if the people in their district don’t vote for them, they are no longer in congress. If they decide to run for the Senate, even with all their millions of twitter followers, only those in corresponding states could vote for those women if they decide to run for Senate.  However, the President can affect foreign policy. The President can create an atmosphere that legitimizes racism, that looks at all brown skin people trying to immigrate to the United States as “illegal”, can appoint Supreme Court Justices, can sell the virtues of American and pervert is Democratic ideals in order to enrich himself. And that is bad for the Jews. Anything or anyone that threatens liberal democracy is ultimately bad for the Jews. History teaches us that we don’t do well in totalitarian governments. We didn’t do well in Communist Imperial Russia nor did we do well in Fascist Nazi Germany.  So maybe being loved and praised by Trump isn’t such a good thing especially when all the racists and white supremacist agree with him.

Peace,

Rav Yitz

History's Page Will Be Neatly Carved In Stone ( John Barlow & Bob Weir- "Throwing Stones")

It’s not every week where we get to watch history made and unmade. For all the soccer (football) fans, history was made when France won the world cup led by a teenager. That hasn’t happened since the legendary Pele led his team to a World Cup victory while he was a teenager. History was also unmade as the President did his level best to undo a seventy-year relationship with Europe, explicitly commenting historical allies including Canada, Germany, England and NATO, the EU, should be considered foes. History was also unmade as the President did his level best to befriend a government, a type of leadership, and a country that, in the aftermath of WWII, gave the world an Iron Curtain, attempted to give nuclear missiles to Cuba, brought legitimacy to North Korea, Chairman Mao’s China, Assad’s Syria, as well as a rise in cyber warfare in places that have democratic elections. As remarkable uplifting as it was to watch history made; it was equally disconcerting and deflating watching history being unmade. I was raised to believe that History could be considered something sacred, something holy. It is something to be learned. It is something that connects the present to the past. It allows us to chart a path to a better future. So I was absolutely aghast when I saw a leader behave in a manner that was completely bereft of a sense of history, and acknowledgment of belonging to a rich tradition, of belonging to an organization that predecessors helped to create. Perhaps even more troubling is that without a sense of history, a person could legitimately believe that until showing up, nothing preceded his/her arrival, and nothing of value will probably follow. That attitude is completely at odds with a person who reveres history and that attitude is completely at odds with Torah, Judaism and Moshe Rabbeinu.

This week’s Parsha is Devarim, which is the first Parsha of the Book of Deuteronomy or Sefer Devarim. Moshe recounts in very wide brushstrokes, the experience of the generation that fled Egypt. Very few details are given. In fact Moshe begins the story at the foot of Sinai; however, the name is changed from Sinai to Horev. In his recounting, Moshe speaks as a participant in this national experience not in the third person, as was presented in the Books of Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers. This is quite different from the Moshe we have seen. Until now he spoke as a prophet. God spoke to him and he spoke to B'nai Yisroel. Now Moshe displays a certain amount of freedom as he shares past experience from his perspective. Parsha Devarim is the introductory Parsha to Moshe’s formal teaching of the Torah to this new generation. Moshe begins with a history lesson beginning with the most recent events and working backward to the Exodus. Moshe Rabeinu, now only a few weeks from the moment of his death, imparts his teaching and his wisdom upon B’nai Yisroel like a dying grandparent or parent would to his/her children.  This re-telling or repetition of history and laws to a new generation inspired the Talmudic Sages to call Sefer Devarim (The Book of Words- Deuteronomy) the Mishnah Torah or the repetition of the Torah.

Both the Parsha and the Book of Devarim begin with a narrative statement.  Eilah HaDevarim Asher Diber Moshe El B’nai Yisroel B’Eiver Yarden-These is the words that Moshe Spoke to all Israel, on the other side of the Jordan…(Deut. 1:1) For the next 5 verses, the Torah’s text is in the third person narrative form in which a time and place are clarified. Finally, beginning with verse 6, the third person narrative shifts to Moshe’s words.  What follows in Moshe's teaching and Moshe’s repetition of the Torah embodies tradition. Moshe’s teaching and his repetition of the Torah, exemplifies every parent’s responsibility to strengthen the child’s connection to Judaism, to Torah, and to God. Why do we need to be told that for five verses, Moses’ words will be arriving shortly? Since there are no wasted words in the Torah, why don’t the words Eilah Devarim appear immediately before Moshe begins speaking? The Or HaChaim, Chaim Ibn Attar (1696-1743), was a leading Moroccan Rabbinic Commentator of his day, explained that the word Eilah implies “only” and is therefore restrictive and separates that which came before from that which follows. The words that came before this are God’s the words that follow this Eilah are Moshe’s and are of his own volition.  Citing the Talmud in Tractate Megillah 31, we are reminded that Moshe personally recorded the curses and admonitions in this book and even the legislation which he repeats he does so voluntarily; not because he was commanded to do so.  The first five narrative verses clarify time and space as Moshe’s words are about to follow because we might conclude that just as Moshe felt free to say what he wants here in Devarim, he might have felt free to say what he wanted in the previous books of the Torah. “Only these words” that Moshe spoke of his own volition.

The Book of Devarim will remind us that Moshe Rabeinu was an incredibly humble man. There was none more humble. Here was Moshe Rabbeinu, the elder statesman, the individual that unquestionably had the closes relationship with God, a leader of a people for more than forty years. He had every reason to believe that there was no narrative before he came upon the scene. He has every reason to not care what happens after he is gone since he is prohibited from entering into the land. However by taking on the role of the transmitter, Eilah HaDevarim Asher Dibeir Moshe – “These are the words that Moshe spoke” and was astute enough to write down, Moshe understood his place in History. He understood what it meant to make history, and to do so, inspire people to continue transmitting his message, his words long after he was gone. After watching certain leaders unmake history, fail to understand his place in history; I realize that those leaders don’t have words that inspire a message worth transmitting to future generations.

Peace,

Rav Yitz

The morning sun will rise, but the darkness never goes from some men's eyes. (John Barlow & Bob Weir- "Throwing Stones")

We attended two commencements this week, a middle school commencement and a High School commencement.  Grandparents attended as well as our eldest daughter in from Florida.  Yes, there was a lot of pride, and a realization of a “new normal”. Each graduation featured a similar comment regarding a need for the “graduates to be aware that the world is full of possibilities as well in need of some fixing.  When we talked to our graduates that the world might need some fixing, we immediately asked them if they had seen the pictures of children being taken from their immigrant parents along the Texas/Mexican border. We asked if they heard the White House Press Secretary refer to the Bible as the pre-text to justify a policy of separating children from parents as a deterrent from entering a land of freedom and opportunity.  As I watched my kids walk across the stage, to receive their diplomas; I thought about all the stages my wife and I walked across to receive our diplomas, diplomas from schools in the U.S. and Canada.  I thought about my Grandfather, a son of immigrants. As I watched our children, my grandfather’s words, one of his many mantras, haunted me. “Parents sacrifice so that the children, the next generation will do better”. I thought about my mother in law whose parents were among the last leave Germany, arriving in New York before Jews were turned away like the “Voyage of the Damned”. As our kids walked across the stage, I thought about all those parents just traveled 1500 miles fleeing the for their lives and their children’s lives seeking asylum,  only be refused entry and have their children taken from them in the process. 

This week we read from Parsha Chukkat. This Shabbat we read from Parsha Chukkat. Chukkat begins by telling us the Law for the Red Heifer. The Priest who prepares the mixture of water and the Red Heifers burnt ashes will render the entire nation spiritually pure; but the mixture will render him impure. A brief narrative concerning the death of Miriam, the lack of water and B’nai Yisroel’s resulting anxiety and lack of faith leads to the issuance of another test of faith in the Wilderness. Moshe and Aaron don’t know what to do; so God tells them: Kach et HaMateh v’Hakhaeil Et Ha’Edah Ata v’Aharon Achicha v’Dibartem El HaSela L’Eineihem V’Natan Meimav V’Hotzeitah Lahem Mayim Min HaSela V’Hishkita et HaEidah v’Et B’Iram – Hashem spoke to Moshe saying: Take the staff and gather together the assembly, you and Aaron your brother, and speak to the rock before their eyes that it shall give its waters. You shall bring forth for them water from the rock and give drink to the assembly and to their animals (Num. 20:8). Instead of following instructions, Moshe succumbed to his anger and hit the rock with his staff. Indeed water came out, the people drank, but Moshe and Aharon were punished. Aharon died and Moshe learned that he would not be able to enter into Eretz Canaan. As B’nai Yisroel resumes its wandering, they are attacked by Amalek. As a result, B’nai Yisroel is forced to go around the heart of Amalek territory. The people complain to Moshe again. They try to seek permission from the Sihon, the King of the Amorites, to pass through Amorite territory. Sihon denies permission and B’nai Yisroel attacks and eventually defeats the Amorites. Og King of Bashan tries to prevent B’nai Yisroel from marching through his land, B’nai Yisroel, with the help of Hashem, defeats King Og and his army.  The Parsha concludes with B’nai Yisroel settling on the Plains of Moab on the eastern side of the Jordan poised to enter into Canaan.

After the decree of the Law of the Red Heifer, the Torah begins a new narrative, a narrative about Miriam’s death, a lack of water, B’nai Yisroel’s complaint and God’s response. Rashi comments on the first Pasuk of Chapter 20.  Eidah Shaleim – the congregation is complete (whole). Sh’Kavar Meitu Metai Midbar, V’Ilu Parsho L’Chayim (Tanuchuma) – All those of the generation that left Egypt that was supposed to die have died in the wilderness, and all those who are alive at this point are supposed to enter into Eretz Canaan.  From this point on, the Torah records the final year of B’nai’ Yisroel’s time in the wilderness.  So 38 years have transpired from the first chapter of the Parsha to the second chapter of the Parsha. Yet in 38 years, a generation that didn’t really know slavery, which only knew that Hashem provided food and water, a generation that didn’t have do anything except learn Moshe’s Torah begin to sound like their parents and perhaps their grandparents. Yes, Moshe disobeys God by hitting the rock rather than talk to the rock. However, Moshe’s frustration might have been a result of the fact that he expected this generation to know better, to have more faith in Hashem, more trust in Hashem, more of sense of purpose in terms of its relationship with Hashem. Sadly, after thirty-eight years, our ancestors, this time, a generation born to freedom, still had work to do Vis a Vis its relationship to Hashem. Yes, they came a long way since their parents were slaves, but they still had a long way to go in terms of trust in Hashem, faith in Hashem, and a confidence that Hashem would not abandons his chosen people.

                Sadly, the White House Press Secretary is right.  The events transpiring along the U.S. Mexico border have a biblical sensibility about it. She thinks that the “enforcement of the law” defines the biblical nature of the treatment of these immigrants/refugees. A group of people fleeing a miserable place and seeking a “promised land” is indeed biblical. However, it is the behavior of Og and Sihon, denying entry of a people seeking a better life that is so troubling.  One would have thought after the dismal record of preventing Jews from entering with the outbreak of WWII and the detention of Japanese Americans, it would do better than that. Sadly, a nation that had once been a moral beacon is not an Eida Shalem (a Complete Congregation). Instead, it is incomplete and as such a darkness emanates from that moral beacon rather than light. Needless to say, at each graduation, my family has never sung the “Oh Canada” louder nor with as much pride.

Peace,

Rav Yitz

And The Politicians Throwing Stones; So The Kids, They Dance, They Shake Their Bones (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Throwing Stones"

          Last weekend, while our son was reading Torah and chanting Haftarah in a shul in Efrat, while Neo Nazis had already marched and the world was waiting for the President to denounce the Neo Nazis, and while Israel waited three days  for Prime Minister Netanyahu to denounce the Neo Nazis; a story of corruption has been plaguing Prime Minister Netanyahu.  In fact four cases of corruption have been raised including the acceptance of gifts, illegal purchases of submarines and negotiating with an Israeli newspaper to insure positive coverage. Being here in Israel, there is weariness when it comes to Netanyahu. Nowhere was this more evident than last Shabbat lunch.  Two friends of ours, one political liberal from Tel Aviv and one political conservative from Efrat were arguing politics as all Israelis do. However as much as they disagreed about solving the Palestinian –Israeli conflict, both agreed that Netanyahu was not part of the solution. Why? The perception is that Netanyahu is only concerned about Netanyahu and remaining in power.

                This week, we read from Parsha Shoftim. Moshe has completed his lecture on the values of monotheism and covenant. Now he begins telling B'nai Yisroel all the nitty gritty details of living a Jewish life within this community. What a downer! B’nai Yisroel is inspired and ready to enter into Eretz Canaan and begin living the life in the land that God had promised their ancestors. They are now ready to begin fulfilling the dream that allowed them to survive centuries of slavery. So what does Moshe Rabeinu do? He brings them crashing back to reality. Now they will listen and understand laws concerning war, punishments for idolatry, choosing a king, jurisprudence, priestly entitlements and unsolved murders. Moshe gives B’nai Yisroel a healthy dose of reality by supplying all the details required to uphold the Covenant.

            Implicit in Moshe’s lecture, implicit in a society, any society for that matter, is the role of justice. Justice provides a check and balance to corruption. However the concept itself let alone the reality of it can also become corrupt and perverse. Hence it is not enough for Moshe to tell us Shoftim v’Shotrim Titen Lecha  Sh’Arecha Asher Adoshem Elokecha Notein Lecha Lishvatecha  V’Shaftu et Ha’Am Mishpat Tzedek – Judges and officers shall you appoint in all your cities- which Hashem, Your God, gives you -  for your tribes; and they shall judge the people with righteous judgment. Moshe must explain what “righteous judgment” means, its foundation for a civilized society, its difficulty to maintain, and the brutal honesty required. Lo Tateh Mishpat – You shall not pervert judgment, Lo Takir Panim – you shall not recognize a person’s presence, V’Lo Tikach Shochad Ki HaShochad Ye’Averi Einei Chachamim Visaleif Divrei Tzadikkim – and you shall not accept a bribe, for the bribe will blind the eyes of the wise and make just words crooked (Deut 16:18-19).

            Justice, as we have learned, is supposed to be blind. Whether poor or wealthy, whether blue collar crime or white collar crime, justice is supposed be oblivious to our tendency to automatically side with the downtrodden or the wealthy and privileged person. Why? Because corruption is blind as well. The poor can be corrupt and so can the wealthy. Corruption knows no barriers to color, religion, gender or nationality. The only barrier to corruption is our own individual constitution and desire to Tzedek Tzedek Tirdof – Righteousness Righteousness shall you follow (Deut. 16:20). For Bnai Yisroel and for the Jewish people, our sense of Justice comes from Torah, these laws and the fact that justice must remain utterly pure without a blemish. Later on in the Parsha we are taught that a king, the one person who must wield justice, must write two Sifrei Torah. One he carries one he keep pristine and locked away only to be used to check against the “everyday Torah”.

            No, the corruption charges that Netanyahu faces don’t appear to be going away. Yes, the corruption charges have diminished the effectiveness by which Netanyahu governs. Yes it’s frustrating to listen to our son the Bar Mitzvah, shake his head and wonder aloud about moral leadership, and the importance of service when a leadership is more worried about self promotion,  enriching his own wallet, and working outside the democratic process. However even more troubling, as we have seen Israel, and spent time with close friends who have made Aliyah, is to hear our son’s concern and disillusionment when he says that he didn’t think that a country built upon Torah would have leaders that were corrupt, just like leaders in other countries. All I can tell him is that whether a society is built upon Torah or not; power can corrupt.

                                                                                      

Peace,

Rav Yitz

We Will Leave This Place An Empty Stone (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Throwing Stones")

With school coming to an end, and a wife and three children packing up and getting ready for camp, the house had been in a state of chaos; clothes, boxes, duffle bags and sheets were all over the floor. It had become difficult to walk. I could barely get into bed since so much of my wife’s things had accumulated upon our bed.  Then, amid clothes, garbage, bags, and more clothes, something odd began to happen.   Clothes, towels, sheets, shoes and toiletries started to be packed into duffle bags. Full bags which had briefly blocked access in the hallway were brought down stairs. Duffle bags were loaded into the bag of the minivan. My wife and 17 year old daughter drove off ( I will bring our 16 year old daughter and 13 year old son to camp on Tuesday). Amazingly enough, I could see the floor again, I had access to my bed again, and I no duffle bag blocked my access to a room, or a stairway.  The house was starting to empty out. Needless to say when I return from dropping off the remaining two children, the house will be as empty as ever.  It will be quiet as ever and as peaceful as ever. For a little while, that emptiness, that quiet, will be much appreciated and cherished.

This Shabbat, we read from Parshat Korach.  Korach was a relative of Moshe's. They both came from the tribe of Levi. Korach questioned Moshe's authority. He did not do this during a private meeting between individuals. Rather, Korach gathered 250 supporters, and then publicly challenged Moshe. Moshe tried to keep peace within the community, but to no avail. A divine test is administered, and Korach and his supporters fail. The earth swallows them up. However God is angry and a plague falls upon the people. They are communally punished for Korach's actions, their passive support, and their failure to bond together against Korach.  Yet the people are still not convinced that Moshe and Aharon should remain in charge, only that Korach was unworthy. So a second divine test is administered this time with 12 rods stuck in the ground and almond branches resulting in Aaron’s staff, thus symbolizing that God has chosen Aharon to be the Kohen Gadol.  The Parshah concludes with God speaking to Moshe and enumerating Aaron’s priestly responsibilities, all of the entitlements and all the sacrifices that come with the position.

Just exactly who is Korach, did his rebellion begin spontaneously or was it a long time in the making? The Torah begins the Parshah, teaching us Korach’s genealogy.  His great grandfather is Levi, the third son of Yaakov.  This means that he is a cousin to Moshe and Aharon, both of whom were also the great grandson’s of Levi. Without know much more about Korach, we can already guess his motivation behind the rebellion.  The entire power structure, Torah knowledge, and Priestly knowledge, was controlled by the two brothers, Moshe and Aharon.  The other Leviim, we know, had been given certain special tasks focused upon the maintenance of the Mishkan.  Certainly within the culture of the Mishkan, these jobs, and these Levite families were a big deal. However, outside the Levi  tribe, outside the culture of the Mishkan, not too many members from the tribe of Benjamin, Asher, Naftali, Dan or even Judah cared too deeply about the responsibilities of the various Levite families. Their only concern was Aharon, since they brought their offerings to him; and Moshe, since he was the ultimate decisor of Jewish law. Ibn Ezra, the late 11^th  early 12 century Spanish commentator explains that the rebellion was hardly spontaneous.  He had been thinking about this since the inauguration of the Mishkan (Tabernacle), when Aharon and his sons were designated to replace the other  first born.  Korach took two leaders from the Tribe of Reuben, Jacob’s biological first born son, but overlooked in terms of spiritual inheritance.  The name Korach, means “Baldness, bald spot, or emptiness”.  Korach wanted to be the legitimate heir to Levi. He wanted to  fill the void of leadership when the Mishkan was being built and a person (and ultimately a family) had to be the head of the Mishkan.  However, Korach also spread emptiness to the rest of the community. For Korach to gain power, he separates himself from the community- Vayikach Korach (16:1). He creates an empty space in order to justify his filling it.

Yes, my house will be empty for a few weeks. It will be quiet, it will be peaceful. As soon as the cleaning late comes, it will finally be clean. It will even stay clean for several weeks. I will even relish the quiet and the emptiness. Those empty places, will remain empty until my wife and children return from their summer camp experience. Then, once again those empty spaces will be refilled. Korach didn’t want emptiness for the sake of emptiness. He wanted emptiness in order that he could be the one to fill it. He looked at emptiness as an opportunity to satisfy his own sense of ego.  We all go through moments of experiencing emptiness.  We can leave those spaces empty and in so doing, make them sacred. We can fill that emptiness with sacred activity such as learning and study of Torah. We can even fill those empty spaces with self aggrandizing activities.  Certainly some choices and motivations behind chosen activities will ultimately become more meaningful and beneficial than others.

Peace,

Rav Yitz