Red And White Blue Suede Shoes, I'm Uncle Sam How Do You Do?; Give Me Five Stay Alive, Ain't No Such Luck I Learned To Duck (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "U.S. Blues")

           With the beginning of the July, I cannot help but think about the importance of July 1st Canada Day and July 4 U.S Independence Day, sacred days for both my adopted country and my country of origin, These first few days of July remind me of the importance of liberal democracy, on this continent and throughout the world. As Winston Churchill said, “democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others that have been tried”.Yet despite Churchill’s insightful words, democracy and democratic institutions are under pressure, especially in two of the three democratic countries that should be beacons of democratic light throughout the world: Israel and the U.S. In Tom Friedman’s June 28th New York Times Editorial, entitled “The victory-at-any-cost mentality of the Trump far right — which was vividly described in Washington on Tuesday during Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony to the Jan. 6 committee — is part of a broader trend of deeply anti-democratic values that are at odds with what many Americans and Israelis still aspire to. If this trend prevails, it will tear apart both societies, which is why the soul of Israeli democracy and the soul of American democracy is on the ballot in their next elections”. However, Friedman takes solace in the one-year experiment of Israel’s outgoing governing coalition comprised of center left/right wing/and Arab parties that managed to govern, pass a budget for the first time in 3 years, and essentially govern based upon democratic ideals, facts, and hope instead of fascism, alternative facts and fear. Friedman also found solace in the recent testimony before the January 6th committee of a 25-year-old white house staffer who came forward and told the committee all that she saw, all that she made notes of, and all the conversations she had. Friedman reminds us that democracy depends upon the ability to govern from the center, not the extremes, and there comes a time when individuals must always remember that the first loyalty is to country, constitution, and the rule of law and not party or individual. 

          This morning we read from Parsha Korach. Following their punishment of wandering for forty years because of their initial belief in the ten spies’ false report, Korach, a member of Moshe Rabeinu’s family stirs up trouble. Moshe’s authority is questioned, those who rebel are punished, and those who were silent bystanders were also punished. The Parsha concludes with God speaking to Moshe and enumerating Aaron’s priestly responsibilities, all of the entitlements, and all the sacrifices that come with the position

          Clearly, the most poignant moment in the narrative is the confrontation between Korach, Datan and Aviram, and all their followers with Moshe and Aaron. After witnessing Miriam becoming a leper for speaking against Moshe (Parsha B’Halotcha), after witnessing God’s anger and Moshe’s defense of the people in Parsha B’Halotcha and Shlach Lecha, the rebellion is very troubling. Moshe is shocked by it. He is hurt by it. The fact that he didn’t want the job in the first place, the fact that he went to bat for his flock time after time, leaves Moshe questioning his purpose.  Vayishmah Moshe Vayipol Al Panav – Moshe heard [the complaints] and fell on his face (Num 16:4).  Why did Moshe fall on his face? The Medieval commentators offer a variety of explanations.  Chizkuni, the 13th-century French commentator explains “Moshe fell to the ground in humiliation [at Korach accusation]. Rashi, the 11th-century French commentator explains that “Moshe fell in despair, he felt powerless to appeal to God for the fourth time. He defended the people after the Golden Calf, when they complained for no good reason, and when they heeded the spies." However, there is another and, perhaps, more modern reason why Moshe fell upon his face. Moshe was not humbling himself before Korach and the rebels. Rather he was publicly demonstrating that he was humbling himself before God, Torah, and its institutions. Moshe publicly demonstrated that his own ego and welfare were subservient to God and Torah. Korach’s rebellion and the fact that Korach did not fall upon his face indicated that Korach put himself above Torah and the community. Moshe was trying to save and preserve Torah, God, and community at his own expense.  Korach was clearly trying to promote himself.

          From the episode of Korach, we see the first example of how messy leading a community can be in which laws are discussed and interpreted as opposed to enacted based solely upon power. From the episode of Korach, we see, for the first time, a leader placing the rule of law, a document, and its institutions above himself. In doing so, Moshe preserves the community as well as retains his role as leader.  This type of leadership can neither afford to be cynical, self-centered, nor arrogant. Rather, this type of leadership must have the courage and the patience to lead people in a direction that is required as opposed to what the people may desire. Indeed, great leadership requires the courage to rule from the middle and to preserve a community’s sacred institutions and documents even at the expense of power.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

Red And White, Blue Suede Shoes; I’m Uncle Sam, How Do You Do (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia -" U.S. Blues")

           This week, Canada celebrated its national birthday and early next week, the United States will celebrate its national birthday. Both countries are the embodiment of the “New World'', a world based upon laws, democracy, and a dream that the future is genuinely brighter and more hopeful than the past. Both countries offer possibility, opportunity and aspire to create a society where one ought to be judged by the “content of character”, not by skin color, country of origin, wealth, or family connections. Both countries have always made it clear that no person is above the law: Not the poorest, not the wealthiest, not the meekest, not the most powerful.  So as my children celebrate both Canada Day and Independence Day; I feel compelled to remind them that what they should keep in mind when they celebrate is that more than any form of government more than any form of a society’s basic principle of social organization; Democracy is the holiest form of government and, besides Torah, Democracy is one of the holiest organizing principles of a society. Like Torah, in Democracy the Law is sacred, the law is Holy, and no king, no leader is above the law. Like Torah, Democracy and Law work best when it avoids fundamentalism/extremism of the left and right; but rather sticks to the middle (Deut. 28:14).

          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few Psukim of the Parsha is a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of the Moabite /Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded its 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and is poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc).

          In between the narrative of the Daughters of Tzlophchad and educating the new generation about all time-bound offerings that correspond to Shabbat, Festivals and Rosh Chodesh, Moshe makes a request of God. Acknowledging that he cannot go on forever, Moshe asks God for a successor.  Yifkod Hashem Elohei HaRuchot L’Chol Basar Eish Al Ha’Eidah, Asher Yeitzeh Lifneihem Va’Asher Yavo Lifneihem Va’Asher Yotzieim Va’Asher Y’Vieim V’Lo Tiheyeh Adat HaShem KaTzon Asher Ein LaHem Roeh - May Hashem, God of the spirits of all flesh appoint a man over the assembly, who shall go out before them and come in before them, who shall take them out and bring them in; and let the assembly of Hashem not be like sheep that have no shepherd (Num. 27:16-17). In these two verses, we learn about Moshe’s attitudes concerning the necessary qualities for leadership. A leader “ goes out before the people”, and not lead from behind. Like the shepherd, he looks after all the people including the most vulnerable members of the flock. Moshe does not foist his sons upon the people nor upon God as possible successors to Moshe. Even the way Moshe addresses God in this brief narrative suggests something less particularistic, less elitist, more “democratic” and more focused upon the content of character. Moshe refers to God as “the God of the spirits and all flesh”. Rashi explains that “God of spirits and all flesh” refers to God’s knowledge of the intricacies of the human mind, the complexities of human personality and that each individual’s character permits that person to succeed or fail in certain situations. God’s response to Moshe is simple and straightforward. God points to Joshua Asher Ruach Bo- because in him there is spirit (Num 27:18). Joshua has the necessary and appropriate character needed to lead B’nai Yisroel on the next phase of its national journey. Joshua is not from Moshe’s tribe, he is not Moshe’s son nor nephew. Joshua was evaluated solely upon the content of his character. He has Ruach Bo- the spirit within him. He possesses the right character for the job.

         No, there was no election to name Moshe’s successor, nor did the people choose. Despite that, God and Moshe taught this new generation, and every generation after, an important lesson about society. Certainly there social and religious institutions that were based upon the tribe, and upon birth. The Mishkan would be operated and maintained by the Leviim. Only descendants of Aaron, Elazar, and then Pinchas, could serve as the Kohen Gadol. Apart from the Temple and the institution of animal sacrifices,  leadership was based upon the content of character. Today, we understand that knowledge and the content of character are perhaps the most important qualities in our elected officials,  and our community leaders, especially in communities that aspire to the highest of democratic ideals. As parents, we teach our children to evaluate leaders based upon their knowledge and the content of their character, We hope that as our children make their way in the world, that they will also be judged for their knowledge and the content of their character. After all, judging one by the content of one’s character is as old as Joshua being named Moshe’s successors and as new as the noble experiments of democracy here in the “New World”.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

Mother American Night, Here Comes The Light (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Black Throated Wind")

Both Canada and the United States celebrated this week. On Monday, Canada celebrated The Articles Confederation and its 152^nd birthday. On Thursday, the United States celebrated the ratification of the Declaration of Independence and its 243^rd birthday. Both the days were marked by people enjoying beautiful summer weather, barbeque, baseball, and fireworks. Both countries are a testament to the sanctity of democracy, a free press, and safeguards to prevent tyranny.  Regarding democracy, Sandra Day O’Connor, the first female Supreme Court Justice of the United States commented: “The freedom to criticize Judges and other public officials is necessary for a vibrant democracy.” In parliamentary governments such as England and Canada, we are able to routinely watch the Prime Minister walk into Parliament and be routinely criticized.  In the United States, political satire and the press that assumes the mantle of criticism. The criticism, is of course, a means by which the executive branch is held accountable, apologizes if necessary, and improves.

This week we read from Parsha Korach. This week's Parsha is Korach. Korach was a relative of Moshe's. They both came from the tribe of Levi. Korach questioned Moshe's authority. He did not do this during a private meeting between individuals. Rather, Korach gathered 250 supporters, and then publicly challenged Moshe. Moshe tried to keep peace within the community but to no avail. A divine test is administered, and Korach and his supporters fail. The earth swallows them up. However, God is angry and a plague falls upon the people. They are communally punished for Korach's actions, their passive support, and their failure to bond together against Korach. Yet the people are still not convinced that Moshe and Aharon should remain in charge, only that Korach was unworthy. So a second divine test is administered this time with 12 rods stuck in the ground and almond branches resulting in Aaron’s staff, thus symbolizing that God has chosen Aharon to be the Kohen Gadol.  The Parsha concludes with God speaking to Aharon and re-iterating his obligations in terms of the Mishkan, the Altar, and the Tent of the Meeting.

Clearly, the most poignant moment in the narrative is the confrontation between Korach, Datan and Aviram, and all their followers with Moshe and Aaron. After witnessing Miriam becoming a leper for speaking against Moshe (Parsha B’Halotcha), after witnessing God’s anger and Moshe’s defense of the people in Parsha B’Halotcha and Shlach Lecha, the rebellion is very troubling. Moshe is shocked by it. He is hurt by it. The fact that he didn’t want the job in the first place, the fact that he went to bat for his flock time after time, leaves Moshe questioning his purpose.  Vayishmah Moshe Vayipol Al Panav – Moshe heard [the complaints] and fell on his face (Num 16:4).  Why did Moshe fall on his face? The Medieval commentators offer a variety of explanations.  Chizkuni, the 13th-century French commentator explains “Moshe fell to the ground in humiliation [at Korach accusation]. Rashi, the 11th-century French commentator explains that “Moshe fell in despair, he felt powerless to appeal to God for the fourth time. He defended the people after the Golden Calf, when they complained for no good reason, and when they heeded the spies. There is an enormous difference between falling due to humiliation or public embarrassment and falling down upon the ground due to despair and the knowledge that one his helpless to fix a bad situation. Soon after he falls to the ground, he figures out, along with God’s help, how to solve the problem and consolidate his authority. Just as important, the people learn the lesson about following the emptiness of cynical self-centered leadership.

However, in the context of Canada Day, Independence Day and the celebration of the success of liberal democracy, Parsha Korach teaches us something about leadership. Perhaps it is a lesson or an indication that democracy is vibrant and successful. Not only is a democracy’s vibrancy based upon the peoples’ ability to criticize the various branches of government, but the target of criticism, when necessary must be able to apologize. When leaders fail to apologize or avoid apologizing, they may think that doing so diminishes their power or that they are not answerable to governed. Let those leaders take a less from Moshe Rabeinu.  Not only did he apologize in a heartfelt manner that was full of remorse and integrity, but he consolidated his power and demonstrated greater humanity and approachability. Both qualities are necessary for successful leadership.

It Will Require A Change That Hasn't Come Before (Robert Hunter, Jerrry Garcia,& Phil Lesh "St. Stephen")

I realize that we have just completed the first week of July. What does an American do on July 4^th while living in Toronto? I went to work. However I still managed to listen to a baseball game, and watch the fireworks later that evening. During the broadcast of the game, the announcers were already commenting upon the team’s success and whether they will be active at the end of July when Major League Baseball’s trade deadline occurs. The announcer commented upon whether certain players could use a change of scenery in order for them to improve their performance. For the ownership, some players have failed to reach expectations and they assume that a change of scenery will not only help the player but by trading that player, the ownership might get someone who can help the team.

This Shabbat is we read Parsha Balak. In the Parsha we read an interesting narrative that is filled with suspense, humor, intrigue, an apparent “midseason trade” and even a happy ending. It is interesting to note that throughout the Parsha, the focus is upon the outside world as it relates to the Bnai Yisroel. That is to say, Balak, the king of Moav and the tribe of Midian are the subjects of the Parsha. Bnai Yisroel hovers as the main reason for why the narrative is pertinent; however for once, Bnai Yisroel is not doing something wrong, they are not recipients of God’s anger. Instead they placidly and temporarily settled on the plains of Moav waiting to enter into Eretz Canaan. Not until the end of the Parsha and only after the narrative of Balak and Bilaam concluded, does the Torah return to a narrative style with Bnai Yisroel as the subject of poor behavior and God’s anger.

 Bilaam, a soothsayer is hired by Balak to curse Bnai Yisroel. By cursing Bnai Yisroel, Balak believed that this was the only way to defeat Bnai Yisroel since they had successfully waged war on all the indigenous tribes thus far. The donkey that Bilaam rides upon on his way to cursing Bnai Yisroel refuses to respond to Bilaam, Bilaam grows angrier and angrier. The donkey is able to see an Angel of God in the road and Bilaam the soothsayer cannot. So a humorous conversation between Donkey and Soothsayer occurs (this is the funny part). Bilaam eventually realizes that he is unable to curse Bnai Yisroel. Finally when he is looking from the hills down upon Bnai Yisroel and sees a peaceful, God-fearing community he utters praise instead of curses.  Imagine Balak’s anger and frustration? He hires Bilaam to curse B’nai Yisroel, and instead he blesses Bnai Yisroel! Vayomer Balak El Bilaam Meh Asita Li Lakov Oyvai L’Kachticha V’Hinei Beirachta Vareich – Balak said to Bilaam, “What have you done to me! To curse my enemy have I brought you – but behold, you have even blessed!” (Num. 23:11)

Balak’s frustration is something we can all understand. He believed that Bilaam, a powerful soothsayer/prophet was capable of communing with God and deriving the appropriate sign in order to curse Bnai Yisroel. Bilaam’s response is quite revealing: Halo Eit Asher Yasim HaShem B’Fi Oto Eshmor L’Daber! Is it not so that whatever Hashem puts in my mouth, that I must take heed to speak! Essentially Bilaam explains that he can only say what God would have said. Clearly With his plans stymied, Balak leaves Bilaam in great frustration. If Balak could have traded Bilaam for another soothsayer, he probably would have. As awful a person as Balak is, and as mercenary a person Bilaam is, we can learn a lot from the exchange of both men.  Balak hired the soothsayer to do a job for which Bilaam was renowned for doing. Bilaam did not live up to his reputation.  Had Balak issued a curse himself, even if it failed, at least he would have felt empowered. Remember, Balak is afraid. He knows of Bnai Yisroel’s reputation.  He doesn’t stand a chance in a conventional confrontation. If Balak had been educated and was knowledgeable in the arts of “curse issuing”, then Balak’s frustration would have been directed at God and himself.

While it may be easy to trade players who have not lived up to expectations; it is much harder for Balak to trade Bilaam. For that matter, it’s also really hard to trade ourselves. What do we do when we fail to live up to our own expectations? Do we blame others or do we engage in a bit of introspection and try to improve ourselves?  By turning inwards, by examining our souls, we derive the impetus to ask questions, to learn, and to make Judaism more meaningful. Sometimes, a team will decide not get rid of a player whom they think is underachieving. Rather than look for another player –looking outwards; teams decide to stick with the personnel that they have, to re-affirm their confidence in the player, and give the player more opportunity to play. The result is that both the ownership and the player look inward and renew the sense of commitment and purpose.

                Peace,                   

                Rav Yitz

Long Is The Road We Must Travel On Down (John Barlow & Brett Mydland- "I Will Take You Home")

I had a chance to spend some time with our 26 year old daughter last week.  She happened to have a few days off so we met and drove to Saratoga, NY to attend a concert of my favorite band. As we drove to the concert site, and began seeing more and more people on the road heading towards the concert, my daughter casually pointed out that it looked like a pilgrimage. For some reason, I have always wanted to share the joy of the music and the “scene” with my children as they grew older.  When we arrived at our seats (actually our seats were on the lawn) there was a family sitting next to us: parents and their two university age kids. The father and I spoke and we both agreed that this was something that we wanted them to share because it was important to us. Interestingly enough, this concert only included three members of the original band. One of the new members of the band, (the lead guitarist and vocalist) is substantially younger than the rest of the band, and his appeal is to a younger generation, my children. However because the youngest member of the band enjoys the music, plays the music exceedingly well, and does so in a respectful manner that pays homage to the legendary leader of the band who wrote the music for so many of the band’s songs and defined the band with his guitar playing and mournful voice; older concert attendees, like myself, see this “re-incarnation” of the original band, as a powerful message regarding the transition of time as a journey.

This Shabbat we read from Parshat Chukkat. The Parsha receives its name from the Chok, (the statute) of the Red Heifer. The Kohen Gadol would take a completely Red Heifer, and offer it on behalf of the people as a form of national atonement. The Parsha resumes with the narrative of B'nai Yisroel’s wandering in the wilderness. However, the narrative is 38 years later, towards the end of B’nai Yisroel’s wandering in the wilderness. Now, the Torah shares the final year of B’nai Yisroel’s journey.  Miriam dies and the water dries up. God commands Moshe and Aharon to speak to the rock in order to draw more water for the people.  However after hearing more complaining, Moshe hits the rock out of frustration. Aaron and Moshe are punished. The journey resumes, battles are fought, faith is tested and sometimes B’nai Yisroel passes these tests and sometimes they fail and are punished. The Parsha ends with B’nai Yisroel on the plains of Moab ready to enter into Eretz Yisroel.

With each trial and tribulation, B’nai Yisroel and its leadership must be able to find the blessings and sanctify God.  Even with the death of Aaron, even the Edomites refusing Moshe’s request to travel through their lands and thereby forcing them around on a longer route, this generation that was born in the freedom of the wilderness still needs a shared common experience with the preceding generation.  VaYishmah Ha’Canaani Melech Arad Yoshev Ha’Negev Ki Ba Yisroel Derech Ha’Atarim VaYilachem B’Yisroel Vayashb Mimenu Shevi – The Canaanite king of Arad, who dwelled in the south, heard that Israel had come by the route of the spies, and he warred against Israel and took a captive from it. VaYidar Yisroel Neder L’Adoshem, VaYomar Im Naton Titen et Ha’Am HaZeh B’Yadi V’HaCharamtie et Areihem – Israel made a vow to Hashem and said, ‘If You will deliver this people into my hand I will consecrate their cities’. Hashem heard the voice of Israel, and He delivered the Canaanite and it consecrated them and their cities. It named the place Horma (Num.21:1-3). The Midrash explains that the Amalekites lived in the Negev, and the Arad was really from the tribe of Amalek. Knowing what happened to Amalek the last time (nearly 40 years before); Arad had his army speak Canaanite even though they were wearing Amalek uniforms. As a result B’nai Yisroel prayed for help against “this nation”. In their vow, Israel wouldn’t keep the spoils but rather dedicated it to the Mishkan (Tabernacle). Rashi points out that the vow wasn’t realized until B’nai Yisroel formally entered the land under Joshua’s leadership. Rashi continues to explain that the verse is here because of the vow of consecration and an acknowledgment that over the passage of time, this generation will ultimately fulfill the vow. Torah doesn’t refer to B’nai Yisroel as “B’nai Yisroel”; instead it refers to them as Yisroel, This vow was the first time that B’nai Yisroel tried to give back to God like their ancestor, Jacob did all those centuries before when he also made a vow to God.

Some journeys are for a nation and a people, they are centuries in the making and require tremendous trials and tribulations. Some journeys are 40 years and require trials and tribulations as a covenant is passed from one generation to the next. Some journeys are between parents and children. Hopefully they don’t require forty years, but the journey does require time. The journey also requires an awareness that the journey itself is important, that an experience is to shared and even if it’s not the exact same experience, it is similar enough to be worthy of replication. No it wasn’t the exact same band that I saw thirty five years ago. No the mournful voice that made a ballad sound so beautiful and so haunting was silent. Maybe I felt it was a rite a passage, or maybe I thought it was a powerful bonding experience. Maybe, as a parent, we want to share important things with our children so that they either understand us better. However, as I watched my daughter smiling, listening to the music, understanding the lyrics and absorbing the scene, maybe she understood me just a bit better.

Peace,

Rav Yitz

So Many Roads To Ease My Soul (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia- "So Many Roads")

While Canadians and Americans were celebrating their country’s respective Independence Day and the added bonus of the U.S. women’s soccer team winning the World Cup; a great irony began to take shape in the Middle East and specifically in Gaza. Beginning on July 1^st in the New York Times and in various other news outlets including a Sunday morning news show; a story appeared about Isis and Hamas. It wasn’t exactly what you might have thought… a joint partnership bent on the destruction of Israel. Ironically, Isis believes that Hamas is an illegitimate government for Palestinians. According to ISIS policy makers and spokesman, Hamas is too secular and they are not true believers in the Caliphate and returning Jerusalem to the Caliphate. From Isis perspective, Hamas is too political, too cynical since they only pretend to be Muslim Fundamentalist. ISIS believers that Hamas’ sole reason for existence is to return Israel to the Palestinians and not necessarily rule according to Sharia law. Even in the world of extremism, some extremists are not extreme enough.  During the Sunday news show that explored ISIS’ rise, its popularity and even a version of extremism that overshadowed Hamas; Tom Friedman commented that young men who were disenfranchised, young men with bleak futures, young men who have never held a girl’s hand let alone kissed a girl are promised power, a future and a bride all the while earning a living.  So, these young men move from one form of extremism, extreme exclusion, to another form of extremism, extreme inclusion. While they think they will achieve contentment and peace, ultimately they will only achieve the dead end of an existence based in extremism, based in Sharia law, and a medieval life.

This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few Psukim of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and are poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shelosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals etc).

Isn't it odd, or perhaps even disturbing, that Pinchas' zealousness, his subsequent spear throwing and impaling his targets is rewarded with a Brit Shalom - a Covenant of Peace and Brit Kehunat Olam - a covenant of an everlasting Priesthood? (Num. 25:12). Through our modernist lens, I imagine that most people consider or at least can understand why some may consider Pinchas act to be nothing more than fanaticism or vigilantism. If we consider Pinchas' behavior to be no different that some fanatic or vigilante; then have a difficult time in understanding Hashem’s rewarding Pinchas. To offer Pinchas Peace and the Priesthood becomes seems incomprehensible. The NeZiV (Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Berlin Poland 1817-1893; the Rosh Yeshiva of the Volozhin Yeshiva) offers a fascinating explanation that might be valuable in todays’ age of extremists recruiting young people. The NeZiV explains that the Brit Shalom is a guarantee of peace from an inner enemy from whatever lurked within Pinchas that caused him to kill another human being without due process. "The Holy One Blessed He blessed him [Pinchas] with the attribute of peace, that he should not be quick tempered or angry. Since it was only natural that such a deed as Pinchas' should leave in his heart an intense emotional unrest afterward, the Divine blessing was designed to cope with this situation and promised peace and tranquility of the soul." We can now begin to make some sense of these covenants. Once Pinchas committed his first act of zealous defense of God's glory, perhaps it becomes easier and easier to commit a second third of forty-eight act of zealous defense of God's glory. At some point, from the NeZiV's perspective, the zealot's soul becomes damaged, the zealot's emotions are incapable of feelings, and the zealot's eyes become unseeing except through the lens of their zealousness. The zealot by definition is an extremist and we know that extremism in Judaism is frowned upon and halachically unacceptable (see the laws of the Nazarite).  Precisely because the zealot does not know peace when he/she commits such an act, in Pinchas' case the only gift God could give was that the tumult of his own soul should cease and he should be whole, complete and at peace.

Just imagine if there was no way for Isis to recruit vulnerable young men. What if there were no vulnerable young men. Imagine if young men throughout the world had education, job prospects, a future, didn’t feel disenfranchised or alienated and had been kissed by a girl or at least held a girl’s hand. Yes Isis would still be able to recruit a few, but that is exactly the point. There would only be a few. Young men and young women for that matter, would be far less vulnerable to Isis videos and recruiters. Without fresh recruits, Isis will eventually shrivel up and die, as would Hamas. For the sake of the non-extremists, here’s hoping that the souls of these young men, achieve a sense of peace and contentment sooner rather than later.

Peace,

Rav Yitz