I have always been fascinated by Post-Holocaust/Post 1948 Jewry’s establishment of Jewish observances/commemorations. This is especially the case immediately following the Pesach Festival. Approximately five days after Pesach, five days after the Jewish People celebrated a holiday that is thousands of years old, a holiday in which the Jewish People observe and celebrated its redemption from ancient Egyptian slavery, the Jewish People observe Yom HaShoah, Holocaust Remembrance Day. First established by the Israeli Rabbinate in 1951, Yom HaShoah has been part of the Jewish Calendar for 71 years. For these seven decades, we have not only listened to the testimony of the survivors who bore witness to the Holocaust, but we also listened to historians, sociologists, political scientists, and philosophers explain to us how this happened, the rise of fascism, the rise of nationalism, the scapegoating of a minority, the anonymity of an angry mob, the dissemination of conspiracy theories and disinformation, and the failure of leaders to exert courage to shine a light on wipe out the festering grievance politics. After 71 years, I can help but notice the irony that we are once again focused on that part of the world. However, it appears that some nations have figured out how to spiritually atone for their behaviour 70 years ago, while others have not.
This Shabbat we return to the weekly Torah cycle and read Parshat Acharei Mot. The two previous Parshiot: Tazria and Metzorah interrupted the narrative with the laws of individual purity and impurity. In Acharei Mot, the Torah now teaches the laws for the spiritual purity of the nation. We have focused on the impurities of individuals, now we focus on the community. The Torah teaches us the laws for the offerings of Yom Kippur, national atonement, and Azazel otherwise known as the Scapegoat. The Scapegoat is not offered as a sacrifice to God, but rather is sent out from the camp and left to wander in the wilderness eventually succumbing to the elements. The second half of the Parsha focuses on the holy and unholy relationships within the family. However, the list of inappropriate behaviors between family members is taught within the context of the other nations. Other nations do these things and B'nai Yisroel must refrain from imitating those other nations.
While providing the laws regarding holy and unholy relationships, God invokes Egypt and Canaan. B’nai Yisroel had been enslaved in Egypt and now it prepares for its journey to Canaan. K’Maasei Eretz Mitzrayim Asher Y’shavtem Bah Lo Ta’Asu UchMa’Asei Eretz Canaan Asher Ani Meivi Etchem Shamah Lo Ta’Asu UvChukoteihem Lo Teileichu – Do not practice of the land of Egypt in which you dwelled, and do not perform the practice of the land of Canaan to which I bring you, and do not follow their traditions. (Lev. 18:3) For the past two centuries, B’nai Yisroel dwelled in Egypt, a morally decadent community. Now B’nai Yisroel is about to head into Eretz Canaan, which was also a morally decadent land inhabited by the Moabites, the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Jebusites, and the Edomites. Why would God bring us to a place that is just as morally decadent as the place from which he brought us out? Why would God promise land that was as morally bankrupt as Egypt? One would have assumed that Canaan was already a wonderful place otherwise God wouldn’t have brought B’nai Yisroel there nor would it have been part of a covenant. The Be’er Yitzchak, the 19th Russian Rabbi offers a comment that is relevant to today’s Jewish experience. “The reason for mentioning Egypt and Canaan is simple: if you imitate the Egyptians – then why did I take you out of Egypt? And if you behave like the Canaanites- why should I expel them before you/ it was on condition that you will not do so that I took you out of Egypt and that I shall expel the Canaanites… do not imitate even their innocuous practices, for these lead to total assimilation.” The experience in Egypt was an incubation period to prepare for Torah at Sinai. Our experience in Egypt would constantly serve as a reminder that we ultimately rejected physical slavery and that we ultimately rejected the institutions and behaviors of that master. It is certainly easy to reject all things Egyptian while we are reminded of how damaging the experience was. It is quite another thing to reject the behavior, and culture of a society when one is free when one is not scarred by such a damaging experience. Yet, the success of our people and the future viability of our relationship with God through the Torah could only occur if we are able to reject a dominant culture’s behavior as a free nation and not as an enslaved nation. B’nai Yisroel’s survival ultimately depends upon remaining separate and apart from the cultural majority. B’nai Yisroel’s survival depends upon remaining spiritually distinct from the majority. B’nai Yisroel’s survival depends upon the spiritual strength needed to reject the behaviors of any dominant culture, to refrain from behavior because “everyone else does it”.
At the core of Judaism is the recognition that Judaism constantly establishes distinctions between itself and everything around it. Creating distinctions and separation between the holy and the mundane occurs every day, every week, and every season. Creating distinctions between the holy and mundane occur during the most basic activities of eating and procreation. Creating distinctions between the holy and the mundane occurs in our relationships with the world around us. Judaism also understands that as human beings and as communities there will be moments when fail at observing those distinctions between the holy and the mundane. So God and Torah established a mechanism for individuals and communities to do “Teshuva” to repent, return to God, and continue striving toward holiness. After seven decades, during this week of Yom HaShoah, it is interesting to see which nations have engaged in some degree of Teshuvah and atonement while others have continued to remind contaminated by fascism, nationalism, populism, conspiracy theories, misinformation, and scapegoating of minorities.
Rav Yitz
No comments:
Post a Comment