Red And White Blue Suede Shoes, I'm Uncle Sam How Do You Do?; Give Me Five Stay Alive, Ain't No Such Luck I Learned To Duck (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "U.S. Blues")

           With the beginning of the July, I cannot help but think about the importance of July 1st Canada Day and July 4 U.S Independence Day, sacred days for both my adopted country and my country of origin, These first few days of July remind me of the importance of liberal democracy, on this continent and throughout the world. As Winston Churchill said, “democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others that have been tried”.Yet despite Churchill’s insightful words, democracy and democratic institutions are under pressure, especially in two of the three democratic countries that should be beacons of democratic light throughout the world: Israel and the U.S. In Tom Friedman’s June 28th New York Times Editorial, entitled “The victory-at-any-cost mentality of the Trump far right — which was vividly described in Washington on Tuesday during Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony to the Jan. 6 committee — is part of a broader trend of deeply anti-democratic values that are at odds with what many Americans and Israelis still aspire to. If this trend prevails, it will tear apart both societies, which is why the soul of Israeli democracy and the soul of American democracy is on the ballot in their next elections”. However, Friedman takes solace in the one-year experiment of Israel’s outgoing governing coalition comprised of center left/right wing/and Arab parties that managed to govern, pass a budget for the first time in 3 years, and essentially govern based upon democratic ideals, facts, and hope instead of fascism, alternative facts and fear. Friedman also found solace in the recent testimony before the January 6th committee of a 25-year-old white house staffer who came forward and told the committee all that she saw, all that she made notes of, and all the conversations she had. Friedman reminds us that democracy depends upon the ability to govern from the center, not the extremes, and there comes a time when individuals must always remember that the first loyalty is to country, constitution, and the rule of law and not party or individual. 

          This morning we read from Parsha Korach. Following their punishment of wandering for forty years because of their initial belief in the ten spies’ false report, Korach, a member of Moshe Rabeinu’s family stirs up trouble. Moshe’s authority is questioned, those who rebel are punished, and those who were silent bystanders were also punished. The Parsha concludes with God speaking to Moshe and enumerating Aaron’s priestly responsibilities, all of the entitlements, and all the sacrifices that come with the position

          Clearly, the most poignant moment in the narrative is the confrontation between Korach, Datan and Aviram, and all their followers with Moshe and Aaron. After witnessing Miriam becoming a leper for speaking against Moshe (Parsha B’Halotcha), after witnessing God’s anger and Moshe’s defense of the people in Parsha B’Halotcha and Shlach Lecha, the rebellion is very troubling. Moshe is shocked by it. He is hurt by it. The fact that he didn’t want the job in the first place, the fact that he went to bat for his flock time after time, leaves Moshe questioning his purpose.  Vayishmah Moshe Vayipol Al Panav – Moshe heard [the complaints] and fell on his face (Num 16:4).  Why did Moshe fall on his face? The Medieval commentators offer a variety of explanations.  Chizkuni, the 13th-century French commentator explains “Moshe fell to the ground in humiliation [at Korach accusation]. Rashi, the 11th-century French commentator explains that “Moshe fell in despair, he felt powerless to appeal to God for the fourth time. He defended the people after the Golden Calf, when they complained for no good reason, and when they heeded the spies." However, there is another and, perhaps, more modern reason why Moshe fell upon his face. Moshe was not humbling himself before Korach and the rebels. Rather he was publicly demonstrating that he was humbling himself before God, Torah, and its institutions. Moshe publicly demonstrated that his own ego and welfare were subservient to God and Torah. Korach’s rebellion and the fact that Korach did not fall upon his face indicated that Korach put himself above Torah and the community. Moshe was trying to save and preserve Torah, God, and community at his own expense.  Korach was clearly trying to promote himself.

          From the episode of Korach, we see the first example of how messy leading a community can be in which laws are discussed and interpreted as opposed to enacted based solely upon power. From the episode of Korach, we see, for the first time, a leader placing the rule of law, a document, and its institutions above himself. In doing so, Moshe preserves the community as well as retains his role as leader.  This type of leadership can neither afford to be cynical, self-centered, nor arrogant. Rather, this type of leadership must have the courage and the patience to lead people in a direction that is required as opposed to what the people may desire. Indeed, great leadership requires the courage to rule from the middle and to preserve a community’s sacred institutions and documents even at the expense of power.

Peace,
Rav Yitz