Take Care Of Your People; Get Some Of Them Fed (Robert Hunter - "One Thing To Try")

          About two weeks ago, days before 4 hostages were taken at a Texas shul, a 92-year-old Rabbi passed away. Rabbi  Israel “Sy” Dresner passed away. He was thought to have been the most frequently arrested Rabbi. His protesting and arrests began in 1947 when he protested and organized boycotts of British-owned businesses in New York City when the British government blocked Jewish immigration to what was then called Palestine. Rabbi Dresner was arrested while trying to register African American Voters in the Deep South in the early 1960s. He was arrested along with Martin Luther King in Selma. He was arrested protesting the Viet Nam War. Later, Rabbi Dresner would lead protests in front of the then Soviet Consulate in New York and the Soviet Embassy in Washington to shine a light upon the Soviet Union’s treatment of “Refuseniks” - Jews who were denied immigrating to Israel. For Rabbi Dresner, a Reform Rabbi who grew up Orthodox and always wore a kippah, being Jewish,  meant observing commandments between man and God and demonstrating empathy for society's most vulnerable: those without a homeland, those who couldn’t vote, those who were being drafted to fight an unjust war and those who were being denied the right to leave and emigrate to their spiritual home. About ten years ago, Dresner was giving an interview to the Jewish Telegraph Agency and explained that he would protest and get arrested all over again. When asked why his answer was simple yet incredibly profound. “Because I am Jewish and I didn’t see an alternative”. (Shira Hanau/JTA Jan. 17th, 2022 “Most arrested rabbi who marched with Martin Luther King Jr. dies at 92”).

          This week’s Parsha is Mishpatim. Moshe is still at Har Sinai. However, the revelation that occurred with the giving of the Aseret Dibrot (Ten Commandments) is long gone. Instead, God has now started giving Moshe numerous laws that affect the day-to-day issues raised by human interaction. There is no shofar blowing, there is no anticipation of meeting God at the mountain. Rather there is only God telling Moshe how to decide various legal matters including the damages to be paid if my ox gores your ox; two men are fighting near a pregnant woman and she gets hurt,   and how to treat to a Jewish servant, observing festivals, the issues of liability for those who are asked to safeguard another’s property as well as manslaughter, to name just a few of the fifty-three commandments (according to the Sefer HaChinuch).  Moshe tells these laws to Bnai Yisroel and they respond with the words Naaseh v’Nishmah – we will do and learn.  The Parsha concludes with glowing fire upon the Mountain that Moshe ascends once again.

          While the events at the Sinai proved to be awe-inspiring, no one can live everyday life in a perpetual state of awe. When B’nai Israel experienced that moment of revelation, it left them nearly paralyzed. Overwhelmed and paralyzed with awe and fear, B’nai Israel could not hear all Ten of the Dibrot, all ten God’s statements. After the first commandment,  B’nai Israel pleaded with  Moshe Rabeinu to return to the top of the mountain and receive the other nine commandments. The laws spelled out in Mishpatim are remarkably un-inspiring. They are incredibly mundane. Yet all these 53 laws answer one fundamental question. While at the foot of that smoking mountain,  experiencing revelation, B’nai Israel was told that they are a Kingdom of Ministers (Ex. 19:6). While that is all well and good, B’nai Israel is left wondering how is a Kindom of Ministers supposed to behave? What underlying philosophy or ethical standard provides a basis for all these seemingly mundane laws and concerns about my ox goring your ox?    V’Geir Lo Toneh V’Lo Tilchatzenu Ki Geirim HeYitem B’Eretz Mitzrayim - You shall not taunt or oppress a stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt . The Geir, along with the Almana and the Yatom - the widow and the orphan are examples of the most vulnerable members of that society. Taunting or oppressing the stranger or pain to the Widow or the Orphan V’Chara Api V”Haragti Etchem BeCherev - My Wrath shall blaze and I shall kill you by the sword (20:20-23). To be a “Nation of Priests”  defined by the commentators in Parsha Yitro is to serve God and minister to humanity (Ex. 19:6). Here, in Parsha Mishpatim, it means caring for the vulnerable and the weak. It means that the organizing principle of a civilized society is to protect the most vulnerable. 

          A society inhabited by a Nation of Ministers is a society that cares for the vulnerable and the alienated. Sometimes it seems easy to forget that the Judeo-Christian ethic that so many self-righteous religious and political leaders cloak themselves in is made from the simplest and most humble of fibers: empathy. Even former slaves may lack empathy.  Even former slaves need to be reminded that they were once strangers in a strange land. Remembering our humble and perhaps even humiliating origins are supposed to provide us with the requisite empathy in order to be the Kingdom of Ministers, to minister to the needy, to help the most vulnerable, and to shine a light upon socio-economic and religious persecution. Certainly, Rabbi Israel “Sy” Dresner understood that. 

Peace,
Rav Yitz

So I Give You My Eyes And All Of Their Lies, Please Help Them To Learn (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Black Throated Wind")

          For the past few weeks, I have followed the latest in the cultural wars. The latest battlefront is the response to Critical Race Theory (CRT). Essentially Critical Race Theory suggests that social and legal institutions created by a white-dominated social and legal institution are intrinsically racist or racially insensitive to people of colour. This theory originated in law schools as a way of challenging the racial bias that occurs anywhere. The recent battle that we have been hearing about is not the CRT per se, but the assumption that unless CRT is eliminated, little white children will be taught a version of history that might make them either feel bad about themselves, somehow makes them less appreciative of their society or even unpatriotic. Obviously, the perpetrators of this highly emotional and utterly chaotic response are those incredibly hypersensitive white people who are afraid to acknowledge the past and are certainly anti-intellectual enough that they are incapable of learning from the past. Just imagine if Moshe had to bring that group into Eretz Canaan!

          This week’s Parsha is Devarim, which is the first Parsha of the Book of Deuteronomy or Sefer Devarim. In very large brushstrokes, Moshe recounts the experiences of the generation that fled Egypt. Very few details are given. In fact, Moshe begins the story at the foot of Sinai; however, the name is changed from Sinai to Horev. In his recounting, Moshe speaks as a participant in this national experience not in the third person, as was presented in the Books of Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers. This is quite different from the Moshe we have seen. Until now he spoke as a prophet. God spoke to him and he spoke to B'nai Yisroel. Now Moshe displays a certain amount of freedom as he shares the experiences of the past from his perspective. Parsha Devarim is the introductory Parsha to Moshe’s formal teaching of the Torah to this new generation. Moshe begins with a history lesson beginning with the most recent events and working backward to the Exodus. Moshe Rabeinu, now only a few weeks from the moment of his death, imparts his teaching and his wisdom upon B’nai Yisroel like a dying grandparent or parent would to his/her children.  This re-telling or repetition of history and laws to a new generation inspired the Talmudic Sages to call Sefer Devarim (The Book of Words- Deuteronomy) the Mishnah Torah or the repetition of the Torah. 

          Moshe does not whitewash anything. He is not terribly worried about offending historical sensitivities. While addressing this generation who is about to enter Eretz Canaan, he holds no punches. He points out that their parents and grandparents were unworthy. He points out that their parents and grandparents were spiritually weak. The first issue that Moshe discusses is the reason for wandering forty years. He recounts the incident 40 years earlier with the twelve spies. Moshe does not sugarcoat their parents and grandparents' response to the spies' report.  V’Lo Avitem La’Alot VaTamru et Pi HaShem Elokeichem But you did not wish to ascend, and you rebelled against the word of Hashem, your God. VaTeiragnu V’A’Haleichem VaTomru B’Sinat HaShem Otanu HoTzi’Anu M’Eretz Mitzrayim LaTeit Otanu B’Yad Ha’Emori L’Hashmideinu- You slandered in your tents and said, ‘because of the Hashem’s hatred for us did he take us out of the land of Egypt, to deliver us into the hand of the Amorite to destroy us.” (Deut. 1:26-27). Who is the “you” that Moshe refers to? Clearly, he is speaking to the generation that is physically before him, that is with him on the eastern bank of the Jordan River preparing to realize the covenant. Is Moshe confused? It seems doubtful. Clearly, he is talking about the parents and grandparents of the current generation. Why does he address them as “You”? Clearly, Moshe is not too terribly worried about hurting feelings, destroying love of country, or creating anti-patriotic feelings, nor is Moshe concerned about self-loathing. No, Moshe had one very real concern. If the generation that experienced the miracle of the Exodus, the Revelation at Sinai, Miriam’s Well, Manna, and God’s constant presence,  could lack faith, then each and every generation after could also lack faith. So, Moshe wanted this current generation to learn from their parents' and grandparents' mistakes and not repeat them. By referring to this generation as “you”, Moshe has inserted them into the past and holds them responsible for the future. 

          When I listen to the critics of Critical Race Theory and their fear of teaching history so that everything is whitewashed (no pun intended); I realize that is so antithetical to Judaism. First of all, how do we teach Jewish History? Our history is not only a history of oppression at the hands of dominant and frequently anti-semitism, the Rabbinic Sages look at history as self-inflicted wounds, and shortcomings in faith (Tisha B’Av and the destruction of the First and Second Temples), as well as moments when we rose to such challenges. Judaism does not have saints. Moshe points out that our ancestors had real shortcomings, Moshe had a nasty temper, King David committed numerous morally questionable acts (and paid the price for those morally questionable deeds), King Solomon had numerous non-Jewish women in his concubine that led him to engage in idolatry. Joseph’s brothers conspired against their father and lied to him about Joseph. In the Talmud, our sages record the majority opinion and the minority opinion. Judaism doesn’t whitewash anything. We struggle with the words, we struggle with the text, we interpret, we re-interpret, and interpret some more. Our Sages understood and established a tradition of learning from the successes and the failures of those who preceded us. For our Sages, the reward for learning these lessons was a vibrant Jewish society built upon learning, a society that took care of its most vulnerable, and a society that aspired towards holiness. Maybe all those overly sensitive white parents need to be reminded that the purpose of studying history is not about making sure that their fragile egos are soothed or that their fragile children feel good, but rather learn from the past in order to take responsibility for the future.

Peace
Rav Yitz 

Well, Can't You See That You're Killing Each Other's Soul? (Jerry Garcia - "Cream Puff War")

           On an evening earlier this week, our sixteen-year-old son came to a troubling realization and an incredibly profound comment, linking recent events to a 70-year-old black and white movie. Each day since Pesach, we have all cough snippets of the Derek Chauvin trial going on in Minneapolis.  We watched two events involving police and issues of DWB (Driving While Black), one in Virginia, and another fatal incident in a Minneapolis suburb. There has been increased reporting and discussion of hate crimes directed at Asians. Also over the past few days, we along with numerous Jews throughout the world observed Yom HaShoah, (Holocaust Remembrance Day), Yom HaZikaron (Remembrance Day for Israeli Soldiers and Victims of Terrorism), and finally Yom Ha’Atzmaut (Israel’s Independence Day). After all the homework, studying, and writing our son and I took a break.  As we turned on the 11pm news,  we happened to see a twenty-something Sidney Poitier and a thirty-something Richard Widmark in the 1950 black and white movie No Way Out.  Poitier plays a doctor and Widmark plays a racist two-bit criminal.  The doctor is confronted with the ethics of whether he should treat and save the life of the racist who means him harm or not. The language contains numerous racist epithets that were not “bleeped” out, and we were startled to hear. In one particularly raw scene, a racist woman is watching the doctor (played by Poitier) treat her husband. She makes a reprehensible comment and then spits upon Poitier. Our son watched, tears welled up in his eyes and he commented that it is 70 years later and racism is an impurity in the soul of the racist as well as society. 

          This week we combine two Parshiot: Tazriah and Metzorah. God tells Moshe the laws of purity and impurity as it relates to birth. God instructs Moshe about the appropriate korbanot (offerings) that a mother should make as she re-enters the camp. God also instructs Moshe about Tza'arat, or for lack of a good translation; leprosy. Throughout the rest of Tazria and Metzora, we are told all about Tzaarat. We are told what it is. We are told how it is diagnosed. We are told how it is treated. We are told how it spreads. We are told what to do in case it spreads. Basically, Tazriah is a type of Tza'arat, a type of skin ailment that is commonly thought of as leprosy. However, this skin ailment is not treated by the resident dermatologist. Even if they had dermatologists in the Torah, we would not bring someone suffering from Tazriah to the dermatologists. Why? The skin ailment was not a symptom of any type of physical malady. Since the person with the skin ailment appears before the Priest, the Kohen, we know that the skin condition must be a spiritual malady and not a physical one. Adam Ki Yiheyeh V'Or B'Saro S'Eit O Sapachat O Va'Heret V'Hayah V; Or B'Saroh L'Negah Tzara'at V'Huvah El Aharon H'Kohen O el Achad Mi'Banav Ha'Kohanim - If a person will have on the skin of his flesh a swelling, a rash, or a discoloration and it will become a scaly affliction on the skin of his flesh; he shall be brought to Aaron the Kohen or to one of his sons the Kohanim (Lev. 13:2-3). The rest of the Parsha teaches us the appropriate protocol for treatment. The Kohen checks again to determine if that person has become ritually impure. If so, they must be sent out of the camp in order to avoid the risk of the skin ailment spreading to others. The quarantine would last for seven days. Afterward, the Priest would check again, if there was no contamination the person was brought back into the camp, However, if the contamination remained, then the quarantine would continue for another seven days. Then the process would begin all over again. We also learn that if this contamination spread to the clothes or vessels; then everything would be burned and destroyed.

          In the Talmudic Tractate of Arichin, which primarily focuses upon the laws of valuations; we learn that the skin ailment is a punishment for the sins of bloodshed, false oaths, sexual immorality, pride, robbery, and selfishness (Arichin 16a). All of these physical occurrences are accompanied by a spiritual component. These occurrences all demonstrate the offender's failure to empathize with the needs of others. It is fascinating to think that in an ideal community, we are not only concerned with our own well-being. We should also be concerned about others as well. Our failure to do so leads to a spiritual sickness including petty jealousy, alienation, and increased erosion of community and society. This spiritual sickness diminishes the holiness within the individual and the holiness within the community. By removing the contaminated offender from the community two positive results occur. First, the welfare, integrity, and holiness of the community are spared from spiritual sickness. This is the primary concern since we fear that God will cease dwelling in a community that becomes spiritually sickened or spiritually dysfunctional. Second, the contaminated offender experiences isolation and concern from others, in other words, the contaminated individual had an opportunity to heal. This is exactly what he/she lacked and brought those shortcomings upon the community with such negative consequences.

          So how do we understand the concept of  Tamei and Tahor- Purity and Impurity in the modern world? Both the Torah and Talmud recognize that health and sickness are not confined to the world of physiology. There are some things in this world that can cause one’s soul, one’s mind, or one’s spirit to become unhealthy. The same can be said for society as a whole. The language that the Torah describes the non-physiological aspect of an individual as  Tamei and Tahor -Purity and Impurity or “healthful and unhealthful”.  Our son understood that racism and prejudice are among those negative attitudes and feelings that cause people or society to become spiritually “unhealthful” or impure and if left unchecked, leads to the endangerment and physical suffering of the minority. For Judaism and Torah, that impurity left unchecked renders a sacred community unholy. 

Peace,

Rav Yitz

Believe It If You Need It, If You Don't Just Pass It On (Robert Hunter & Phil Lesh - "Box of Rain")

          Our daughter just turned twenty this week. Because of the Covid 19 Pandemic caused summer camps to close; our daughter celebrated her birthday at home. I think that the last time she was home for her birthday was our first year in Toronto when she attended day camp. That was eleven years ago. Yes, of course, her mother did everything she could to make our daughter’s birthday special. In fact, it began last Shabbos and continued right on into Sunday.  The whole weekend,  I was keenly aware that I was sharing participating in something that I usually don’t get to participate in. The moment first struck me last Erev Shabbos when I blessed her. Every Friday Night, I bless our children. With our University age student home since the Pandemic began in March, I have had the opportunity to bless her along with her younger sister and brother. However this last Friday Night, my blessing seemed different. The words were the same, but because we were both aware that on this particular Shabbat, this time seemed different.  As I blessed her, I thought about her turning twenty. I thought about her making her way through university, directed, and enthusiastic about her studies. I thought about my own mortality and all my children. I thought about what, if anything, they will inherit.
          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few psukim (verses) of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and is poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc).
          Following the narrative of Pinchas and the second census taken in the book of Bemidbar; two narratives occur. One narrative involves the daughters of Tzlophchad and one narrative involves Moshe. Both deal with inheritance. In the case of the daughters of Tzlophchad, there were no sons to inherit Tzlophchad’s portion in Eretz Canaan. In the case of Moshe, he had sons whom he had hoped would succeed him as the leader, much like Aaron’s sons and grandsons ultimately succeeded him as the Kohen Gadol. The daughters make it clear that their father did not die during the various plagues. Rather he died in the Wilderness, (commentators explain that he was the person picking up sticks on Shabbat and was punished with death for having violated the Shabbat). The daughters’ argument was that his punishment should not effect his rightful portion, Avinu Meit BaMidbar V’Hu Lo Hayah B’Toch Ha’Eidah HaNoadim Al Adoshem B’Adat Korach Ki v’Cheto Meit U’Vanim Lo Hayu Lo – Our father died in the Wilderness, but he was not among the assembly that was gathering against Hashem in the assembly of Korach, but he died of his own sin; he had no son. Lamah Yigra Shem Avinu MiToch Mishpachto Ki Ein Lo Bein T’nah Lanu Achuzah B’Toch Achei Avinu – Why should the name of our father be omitted from among his family because he had no son? Give us a possession among our father’s brothers. Quite cleverly, the daughters explain that their father did not participate in any rebellion against Moshe’s nor God’s authority. Rather he committed and the individual sin that led to his death. However, that should not preclude him nor his family from receiving land. Clearly, this was entirely new and Moshe had no idea how to solve this precedent-setting legal issue.  VaYakreiv Moshe et Mishpatan Lifnei Hashem – So Moshe brought their claim to Hashem. However, a hint as to decision exists in the word Mishpatan (their claim). The last letter of the word is written in a bold font compared to the rest of the Torah letters. This special letter designating the daughters tells us that the daughters were meritorious and worthy of making the claim. They did so in a respectful manner mindful of the law and willing to work within the system.  Immediately after the narrative, Moshe asks about entering the land and is reminded that he is prohibited. He asks about his successor. He suggests the qualities that the leader should possess “who shall go out before them and come in before them, who shall take them out and bring them in; and let the assembly of the Hashem not be like sheep that have no shepherd (Num 27:17) God’s answer is direct and unequivocal. Kach Lecha et Yehoshua ben Nun Take for yourself Joshua son of Nun. According to Rashi, Moshe had hoped that his sons would have been worthy and chosen to succeed him. However, Moshe had to “take for himself” Joshua as though Joshua were his own son.
          Moshe had everything to pass down to his successor. Tzlophchad’s daughters sensed that their father’s name to be  “omitted” from the census and lose out on his portion in Eretz Canaan. Nowhere in the Torah do we hear or read about Moshe’s sons doing anything. We read about Aaron’s sons, we read about Aaron’s grandson, Pinchas. We read about Tzlophchad’s daughters. We read about Joshua and Caleb. We read about those who have Zchut (merit) and those who don’t have Zchut, there is only silence. Tzlophchad never knew had a claim on his portion. Moshe wasn’t aware that he could pass his leadership to Joshua. As I blessed my twenty-year-old, I realize that “inheritance” isn’t necessarily about what the parent or grandparent has to pass down to the younger generation. When I bless our children, I realize now that I am passing to my children that which I inherited from my grandparents and my parents. Our children will inherit any wisdom that we have acquired from our parents, our grandparents, and from our own experiences.

Peace
Rav Yitz

And You Of Tender Years, Can't Know The Fears That Your Elders Grew By (Graham Nash -"Teach Your Children")

          Our university-bound daughter returned from summer camp this week. With only a few days to get her clothes washed and packed before being dropped off at University next week; I reminded her that one of the important aspects of being a “college student” is the opportunity to question, question authority, and to question the dominant culture. The idea of questioning is incredibly Jewish and in a sense, “counter-cultural”. As we spoke, I happen to be listening to a band who played for only the second time together fifty years ago before several hundred thousand people. As she listened to the lyrics, I reminded her that fifty years ago this week, in August of 1969, on a farm dairy farm owned by Max Yasgur the Jewish son of Russian immigrants, outside the small town of Beth El, NY, a music and arts festival took place known as Woodstock. Hundreds of thousands of “college-age kids” gathered together. Woodstock would eventually come to represent the counter-cultural movement of an entire decade and generation. Forget for a moment that the nearest town was Beth El, named after the Bet El in Torah. Max Yasgur, the Jewish Dairy farmer, was a member of the Republican Party, a supporter of the Viet Nam war, and he essentially disagreed with everything that the Woodstock came to represent. When asked why he leased his fields for the Woodstock festival, Yasgur explained: “that if the generation gap is to be closed, we older people have to do more than we have done.” ("Farmer With Soul: Max Yasgur". The New York Times. 1969-08-17)

          This Shabbat, we read from Parsha V’Etchanan; it is also known as Shabbat Nachamu “Shabbat of Comfort”. Parsha V’Etchanan is always the Torah portion that immediately follows Tisha B’Av. Certainly, after commemorating the destruction of the First and Second Temples, B’nai Yisroel needed spiritual comforting. Certainly, in this week’s Parsha, V’Etchanan, Moshe’ reassures B’nai Yisroel of its destiny and in doing so, comforts them. After concluding a brief history of B’nai Yisroel’s wanderings and a gentle rebuke of this generation which is about to enter into Eretz Canaan, Moshe now provides a framework for all the laws he will teach in succeeding weeks. Moshe presents the Aseret Dibrot, the Ten Commandments to this news generation. Moshe infuses the people with self-respect. He reminds this generation that the entire basis for our nationhood and our relationship to God is avoiding idolatry at all costs. Avoiding idolatry ultimately distinguishes us from the rest of the world. Finally, Moshe reminds the people that if they follow the advice, then everything will go well. From that perspective, Moshe is re-assuring the people that the future is possible and plausible.

          Certainly the re-iteration of the laws, the inspiring words of the inevitable entry into the land and the realization of a covenant that God made with B’nai Yisroel’s ancestors are considered to words that are both comforting and inspired. However, those words provide comfort in the short term immediate future. Moshe understands that insuring a future is not about the next day, week, month or year. Moshe needs to provide comfort, inspiration, and sustainability for not only the generation that is ready to enter the land but all the generations that will be born in the land, born while in exile and all the generations that transcend time. First, Moshe invokes the two witnesses that embody the infinite. Heaven and Earth are the witnesses to B’nai Yisroel’s acceptance of covenant (Deut 4:26). Moshe reminds this generation that they will become parents and grandparents (Deut. 4:25). Moshe reminds this generation that their primary responsibility is to teach these ordinances, these laws to their children and grandchildren. Moshe reminds this generation that it must teach “how” to observe, “when” to observe, and “why” to observe, and every parent must be prepared for the inevitability that the children will question (Deut. 6:7; 6:20). For Moshe, the most important way to sustain the generational commitment to the covenant is for parents and grandparents to teach and transmit the data, the information, and the values to the next generation.

          Moshe understood and warned B’nai Yisroel that the success of the covenant is depended upon B’nai Yisroel remaining separate and apart from other people. Moshe understood that the covenant remains viable as long as and as effective as parents and grandparents are able to teach it to their children. Moshe also understood that children’s curiosity, children’s desire to learn, to question and to seek reminds parents and grandparents of their sacred task. Then it is up to the older generation to do what it can to pass along their experiences, their wisdom, their knowledge and diminish that generation gap. Fifty years ago, a Jewish dairy farmer in Beth-El, New York understood that and fifty years later, with our daughter preparing to head off to university, we understand that as well.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

You Can Trade Your Soul For An Electric Guitar (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Heaven Help The Fool")

Since last Sunday was particularly quiet, I took a drive and spent the day with my parents. I played some golf with my father, sat by the pool with my mother. When we talk, the subject matter is generally the same thing. My parents spend a lot of time talking to me about our four children: how they have matured, the kind of people they are, their plans, and then, like all Jewish grandparents; they “kvell” (take great joy praising how wonderful their grandchildren are). The next subject is their health. I listen as they share with me their aches and pains and their upcoming doctors' appointments. Often times we discuss Judaism and their Torah classes, and the myriad of questions they may have. Frequently, we discuss the news including politics, Supreme Court decisions and Israel. However, when the news is overly depressing, my parents will discuss sports. After everything that has been going on in Washington DC this past week, my parents and I discussed sports. It was a particularly uninspired week that even my mother joined in our discussion on sports. Thankfully, at this time of year, any discussion centered on sports usually focuses on baseball, free agents, and the trade deadline. We prognosticate as to what our favorite team will do in order to put themselves in the best possible position to win the World Series. During our discussions, my parents and I are always amazed at how a change of environment can truly affect a player’s outlook and performance. Whether it is the organization, the stadium, the fans, the fact that the player has a chance to play in the postseason, or just knowing that they are now playing for a team that wants them; we are always amazed how much better that player performs.

This Shabbat is we read Parsha Balak. In the Parsha, we read an interesting narrative that is filled with suspense, humor, intrigue, an apparent “midseason trade” and even a happy ending. It is interesting to note that throughout the Parsha, the focus is upon the outside world as it relates to the B’nai Yisroel. That is to say, Balak, the king of Moab and the tribe of Midian are the subjects of the Parsha. B’nai Yisroel hovers as the main reason for why the narrative is pertinent; however for once, Bnai Yisroel is not doing something wrong, they are not recipients of God’s anger. Instead, they placidly and temporarily settled on the plains of Moab waiting to enter into Eretz Canaan. Not until the end of the Parsha and only after the narrative of Balak and Bilaam concluded, does the Torah return to a narrative style with Bnai Yisroel as the subject of poor behavior and God’s anger. 

            Bilaam, a soothsayer is hired by Balak to curse Bnai Yisroel. By cursing Bnai Yisroel, Balak believed that this was the only way to defeat Bnai Yisroel since they had successfully waged war on all the indigenous tribes thus far. The donkey that Bilaam rides upon on his way to cursing Bnai Yisroel refuses to respond to Bilaam, Bilaam grows angrier and angrier. The donkey is able to see an Angel of God in the road and Bilaam the soothsayer cannot. So a humorous conversation between Donkey and Soothsayer occurs (this is the funny part). Bilaam eventually realizes that he is unable to curse B’nai Yisroel. Finally, when he is looking from the hills down upon B’nai Yisroel and sees a peaceful, God-fearing community he utters praise instead of curses.   Imagine Balak’s anger and frustration? He hires Bilaam to curse B’nai Yisroel; instead, he blesses B’nai Yisroel! Vayomer Balak El Bilaam Meh Asita Li Lakov Oyvai L’Kachticha V’Hinei

Beirachta Vareich – Balak said to Bilaam, “What have you done to me! To curse my enemy have I brought you – but behold, you have even blessed!” (Num. 23:11) Balak’s frustration is something we can all understand. He believed that Bilaam, a powerful soothsayer/prophet was capable of communing with God and deriving the appropriate sign in order to curse Bnai Yisroel. Bilaam’s response is quite revealing: Halo Eit Asher Yasim HaShem B’Fi Oto Eshmor L’Daber! Is it not so that whatever Hashem puts in my mouth, that I must take heed to speak! Essentially Bilaam explains that he can only say what God would have said. If Balak could have traded Bilaam for another soothsayer, he probably would have.

As awful a person as Balak is, and as mercenary a person Bilaam is, we can learn a lot from the exchange of both men.  Balak hired the soothsayer to do a job for which Bilaam was renowned for doing. Bilaam did not live up to his reputation.  Had Balak issued a curse himself, even if it failed, at least he would have felt empowered.  For Bilaam, at least for that moment, he turned inwards, listened to his soul, listened to the donkey, listened to God and his entire attitude changed. At least for the moment, this mercenary soothsayer offered only blessings to the Jewish people. The fact of the matter is that we need to turn inwards, towards our soul. There, in our own soul, we will find holiness. The funny thing about the trade deadline, sometimes it is the trades that don’t get made turn out to be the best.  Rather than trading for another player –looking outwards; teams decide to stick with the personnel that they have and commit to playing better, commit to exerting greater effort, working harder. They look inward and renew a sense of commitment and purpose. 

                Peace,                   

Rav Yitz 

Stranger Ones Have Come By Here, Before They Flew Away (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "China Doll")

One of my politically astute children commented that the recent 35 day U.S. government shutdown was a result of Trump, Stephen Miller, Rush Limbaugh and Anne Coulter’s fear of strangers. According to these politically astute children, the intention of Trump’s wall seems to keep people who don’t look like Trump, Miller, Coulter or Limbaugh nor speak English like Trump, Miller Coulter or Limbaugh out of the U.S. Certainly,  building a wall would be the fulfillment of a Trump campaign promise. Originally, however, he promised that Mexico would pay for the wall. After listening to these politically astute children, I did a little checking about this “wall business” and these “caravans” along the Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California border, and all the drugs, terrorist, and mayhem. I also did some checking about the border between Canada and the U.S. Guess what I found out? The border between the U.S. and Canada is far more open and porous than the Southern Border. The border between between Canada and the U.S. is much longer and has far less Immigration officers monitoring the border than the US Mexico border. My politically astute children reminded me that according to Trump, Canadians go to the U.S. to shop for sneakers (a Trump Tweet); Mexicans and South Americans bring drugs, MS13 and all the unwanted souls from these other countries. Interestingly enough over the past several years the U.S. Department of Immigration indicated that there has been more people leaving the U.S. and heading into Mexico. Immigration Canada statistics indicate that there has been nearly four times as many illegal border crossing attempts into Canada than U.S. So why does the President focus so much on the Mexican Border and Canadian border?  My politically astute child said the reason was as clear as a beautiful sunny clear Canadian winter’s day? The president perceives that Canadians come from the same Western and Northern European stock  as Americans.  For Trump, Stephen Miller, Anne Coulter, Rush Limbaugh and 44% of Americans who support “the Wall”, the people trying to cross the Southern border are truly strangers. They don’t look like Trump, Miller, Coulter, Limbaugh and the 44% nor do they sound like Trump, Miller, Coulter, Limbaugh and the 44%.

In this week's Parsha, we read from Mishpatim. Moshe is still at Mt. Sinai. However the revelation synanomous with the Aseret Dibrot (Ten Commandments) has come and gone. Instead, God proceeds to present  to Moshe the numerous  mundane laws that affect daily human interaction. There is no shofar blowing nor is there an anticipation of encountering God at the mountain. Rather, there is only God telling Moshe how to decide various legal matters including the damages to be paid if an ox owned by one person gores the ox owned by another person. Or two men are fighting near a pregnant woman and she gets hurt, how does Moshe determine liability/guilt?  How  does one treat a Jewish servant, how are festivals to be observed?, What are the liabilities involved for a person asked to safeguard another’s property? What is the punishment for accidental death or manslaughter?These are just a few of the fifty three commandments (according to the Sefer HaChinuch).  Moshe transmits these laws to B’nai Yisroel and they respond with the words Naaseh v’Nishmah – we will do and learn.  The Parsha concludes with a glowing fire upon the mountain that Moshe ascends once again.

Following the awe inspiring revelation at Sinai in Parsha Yitro, it might seem like a spiritual let down as we read of one law after another. After the revelation of e Ten Commandments, listening to the rules and regulations that govern human interaction might seem tedious. However, buried beneath these rules and regulations is the most sacred of reminders regarding the foundations upon which these executive orders are based.  V’Ger Lo Toneh  V’Lo TilChatzenu Ki Geirim Heyitem B’Eretz Mitzrayim – You shall not taunt or oppress a stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. The Talmudic Sages in Baba Metzia 59b reminds us that the Torah cautions us regarding our treatment of the stranger no less than thirty six times. No other “executive order”, no other commandment, loving God, Shabbat, circumcision, forbidden foods, uttering a falsehood occurs as frequently  as "loving the stranger" or "refrain from oppressing the stranger".  The Talmudic sages understand this commandment in terms of the “stranger” (the idol worshipper turned proselyte). When the “stranger” ceases worshipping idols and begins the process of Torah study; no one oppresses, mocks or demeans his origins. Later Medieval commentators explain that the “stranger” is not only an idol worshipper turned proselyte, in other words, the spiritually defenseless. The “stranger” is the economically defenseless as well. RaShBam (11^th Century French commentator and Rashi’s nephew) clarifies “Do not oppress him” as  do his work since he has no champion. RaMBaM, the great Spanish commentator, adds a caveat to RaShBam. God defends the defenseless. God protects the widows and the orphans. In the previous Parsha, God reminded Moshe to tell B’nai Yisroel that they were to be a Nation of Priests, that is to say, B’nai Yisroel is supposed embody Godliness here on earth. Caring for the stranger embodies Godliness. Failure to care for the stranger embodies the Egyptian behaviour. 

As we continued talking about the wall, we put ourselves in the shoes of th44%. My politcally astute childrent reminded us that it is human nature to fear the “other” to fear the “stranger”, to fear those who look different and sound different. Human nature has on full display in the White House. Yet Torah, Judeo-Christian morality, liberal democracy and the values with which we raise our children seems to appeal to something that transcends human nature. Instead, we are supposed to strive for something greater than human nature. We are supposed to transcend our fear of the stranger. We are supposed to transcend our trepidation of the “other”. We are supposed to be able to empathize with the stranger. After all, at some point in our history, we were all strangers. For the recently freed slaves standing at the foot of Mt. Sinai, Parsha Mishpatim explained how to create a civil, just, caring and humane society predicated upon law, trust, the sanctity of the human soul, and the necessity for empathy. I am willing to bet that no one has told Trump, Stephen Miller, Anne Coulter, Rush Limbaugh and many of the 44% that their respective ancestors who arrived in the New World wanting to build a new life were strangers also.  

Peace,

Rav Yitz

What Truth Is Proof Against All Lies (Gerrit Graham & Bob Weir - "Victim Or The Crime")

Shiva for the last of the 11 Jews murdered in Pittsburgh will conclude this Sabbath. While the relatives of Rose Mallinger (z”l) sat Shiva, an election took place in the United States. When a virulent anti-semite, raging against Jews and Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society murdered Rose and 10 other Jews, Jews need to acknowledge that “it” can happen in America. As my children have watched the news about Pittsburgh unfold, as they have listened to commentators, Rabbis and civic leaders speak about it, as they listen to the President speak about it, they also  I remind my kids that “it” can happen in the U.S. My children watched the President denounced Anti-semitism; and, even though his son in law is Jewish, even though his daughter converted to Judaism, even though his grandchildren are Jewish, even though he has moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem; my children wanted to believe the President. I explained that of course we want to believe the President but then I warned them the need to do their homework and decide whether or not they should believe him. I suggested they take a few minutes and do some reading. The President uses terms like “Globalists” and described himself as a “Nationalist I suggested to my children that they should look into how those terms have been historically used and who used those terms. I suggested that they look up people like Richard Spencer, David Duke and see what they have to say about Trump. I suggested that they read an article about the rise of White Nationalism in the U.S. in the New York Times Magazine. I suggest that they look at t relationship between the rise of “Nationalism” and Anti-Semitism. That information is readily available from the Anti Defamation League

This week’s Parsha is Toldot. We read of the birth of Esav and Yaakov. Even though they were twins, we learn that these boys couldn’t be any different. Esav is a hunter Ish Sadeh – a man of the field, an outdoorsman, Yaakov is Ish Tam v’Yashav b’Ohalo – a simple man who resides in his tent. Yaakov is concerned with the Birthright, receiving blessings and the spiritual world. Esav is concerned with eating, drinking, hunting, and the physical world. We learn that just like his father, Avraham, who experienced a famine in the land, Yitzchak also experienced a famine in the land. Unlike his father, Yitzchak does not go down to Egypt. Yitzchak remains, grows wealthy, and re-opens the wells that had gone dry in his father’s day. The narrative then re-focuses upon Yitzchak and his family. Yitzchak, sensing his imminent death, wants to bless Esav. Rivka overhears this and tells Yaakov to pose as Esav in order to receive the blessing. Yaakov listens to his mother and dresses as Esav. Yaakov receives Yitzchak’s blessing. As a result, Esav is fit to be tied and threatens to kill Yaakov.

            When Esav turned 40, he got married. As different as the boys were before this, Esav’s marriages reflect his further spiritual diminishment from his mother and father. Esav’s association with these women brings out the worst in him. Va’Yehi Eisav Ben Arbaim Shanah VaYikach Isha et Y’hudit Bat B’Eiri HaChiti V’et Basmat Bat Eilon Ha’Chiti – When Esav was forty years old, he took as a wife Judith daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Basemath daughter of Elon the Hittite. Va’Tiheyenah Morat Ruach L’Yitzchak U’l’Rivkah – and they were a source of spiritual bitterness for Yitzchak and Rivka (Gen.26:24). There is a Midrash that tells us that once a species of bird migrated to Eretz Yisrael. The Rabbis were unable to determine whether this new species was kosher or treif. Rabbi Chiya, the leading scholar of his day, said, “Isolate one on the roof and see what kind of birds associate with it.” Immediately a raven (which is not kosher) joined the new bird. The Rabbis were able to finally determine that the new species of bird was not kosher. The same was true with regard to Esav when he married both women. They brought out the worst in him, whether it was Avodah Zarah – idolatry, or degrading himself to such a point that he did not warrant receiving the blessing. Of even greater concern to Rivkah and Yitzchak was the departure of the Divine Presence. Remember that when Yitzchak’s mother, Sarah, died, the light in her tent, the holy presence diminished. When Yitzchak married Rivka, the holy presence returned to Sarah’s tent. However, when Esav’s wives became part of Yitzchak’s household, this holy light was vanquished.

            So my kids discovered that terms like “Nationalist” and “Globalist” mean something to David Duke, Richard Spencer, White Nationalist, and the Alt-Right. My kids discovered you can learn a lot about a person by who gravitates towards that person. My kids discovered that you can learn a lot about a person by not only the words they use but how people respond to those words. Rose Mallinger was alive in February 1939 when the German American Bund Party filled Madison Square Garden for a political rally, and use those words and similar words to describe Jews. Nearly eighty years later those words and similar words have been used in arenas throughout the U.S.to stoke hate and fear. Unfortunately, my kids also learned the valuable lesson that leaders can and should be judged by the words they say, the company they keep, and who else may endorse and support those words.

           

Peace,

Rav Yitz

It's Good To Touch The Green Green Grass Of Home (Curly Putnam - "Green Green Grass Of Home")

A good case could be made that LeBron James is the most despised athlete in Toronto. His Cleveland Cavalier team has eliminated the Toronto Raptors from the playoffs in each of the last three years, and, as a result, he has broken the hearts of Toronto Raptors fans. The broken hearts have become so acute, that following the most recent playoff loss to Lebron James and his Cleveland Cavalier team; Raptor management fired the coach and traded away its most beloved player who, by the way, liked Toronto so much that he wanted to remain in Toronto. LeBron James earns nearly $100 million a year in salary and endorsements. He acknowledges that his family is financially secure for several generations. He understands that he has more than enough. He understands that he can’t possibly spend all that he earns. He readily acknowledges that he has been blessed and with such a blessing comes the obligation to “do good in the world”. LeBron strongly believes that he has an obligation to give back to the community. For LeBron, giving back to the community means providing educational programs for “at-risk youth” in his hometown of Akron.  Until this past week, LeBron’s foundation has invested tens of millions of dollars in college scholarships for at-risk students, providing them with academic and emotional support in order to help them earn a college diploma. Then earlier this week, LeBron’s foundation opened up a school in his hometown of Akron, Ohio. The elementary school is designed for at-risk students. It provides breakfast, lunch, tutors and uniforms for the students. It provides family and career counselling for families, and tutors for its students. As well as aftercare programs for students. The school is considered to be a state of the art facility. When the school opened, LeBron said that besides the birth of his children, the opening of the school was the most meaningful moment of his life, more than winning an NBA Championship.

This week’s Parsha is Eikev. Here in his second discourse, Moshe explains to the new generation how the second set of tablets that contain the Aseret Dibrot came into being. He explains how God forgave the parents of their idolatrous behaviour in regards to the Eigel Zahav (Golden Calf), and all B’nai Yisroel must do essentially refrain from Idolatry, serve God, worship God, and the nation will be rewarded with water, grass and quality lives. Moshe also reminds B’nai Yisroel that they have nothing to fear when they enter into Canaan and conquer the land even if they are outnumbered. God already demonstrated that he will protect his people. He did so during the Yetziat Mitzrayim (Exodus), and he did so over the past 40 years in the wilderness. As long as B’nai Yisroel keeps its side of the B’rit, God will continue to protect his people. V’Haya Im Tishma’u El Mitzvotai Asher Anochi M’tzaveh Etchem Hayom L’Ahavah Et Adonai Eloheichem Ul’Avdo B’Chol Levavchem Uv’chol  Nafshachem. V’Natati M’tar Artzechem B’Ito Yoreh Umalkosh V’Asaftah D’Ganecha V'Tiroshcha v’Yitzharecha – It will be that if you hearken to My commandments that I command you today to love Hashem your God and to serve him with all your heart and with all your soul, then I shall provide rain for your Land in its proper time, the early and the late rains, that you may gather in your grain, your wine and your oil.  V’Natati Esev B’Sadcha Livhemtecha V’Achalta V’Savata – I shall provide grass in your field for your cattle and you will eat and be satisfied (Deut 11:15). Among the rewards is grass for our cattle and we will eat and be satisfied. In this second paragraph of the Shema, we are told that there is a reward for our obeying God’s commandments and there will be retribution for disobeying God’s commandments. Among the rewards is a phrase that, at first glance, does not seem like such a reward. What does this mean and how does it relate to the perils of celebrity?

The simple meaning of the verse suggests that we will eat the grass and or the cattle, but whatever we eat, we will be satisfied –v’Savatah. Satisfied implies that we will not be wanting for anything. Satisfied means fulfilled, content. How can the grass that God will make plentiful satisfy us. Have we ever been too busy to eat? Have we ever been in a place or a situation that cause our adrenaline to pump that we didn’t even feel hunger pangs? Most probably yes, we have all been in situations or places where we were too busy, to wound up, too excited to eat. Yet, we were clearly in a place, both physical and spiritual where we were satisfied.  Rashi explains the verse as follows: When you are very prosperous, you must be very careful not to rebel against God, because man rejects God only when he is sated.”

Experience shows that the temptations of wealth are among the hardest to resist. People who are rich in wealth but poor in sophistication often succumb to temptation. They succumb due to ignorance. They succumb due to arrogance. Sometimes they succumb to boredom. It is so refreshing to see an athlete, even one despised here in Toronto, acknowledge his blessings, accept his obligation to give back to the community, and then do so in a manner that will benefit this generation of young people as well as leave a future legacy.

Peace,

Rav Yitz