I Have Always Heard That Virtue Ought To Be Its Own Reward (John Barlow & Brett Mydland - "Just a Little Light")

           A  former and still popular U.S. President once said that “elections have consequences”. That statement reflects on the leaders who campaigned, and who sought votes and who either won or lost. That statement also reflects upon the public, both upon those who vote and those who don’t, upon those who are enfranchised and those who are disenfranchised, and those who live in and among the community where the election took place and those who do not live in the community but have to deal with the community.  “Elections have consequences” for wherever elections are held, at the Federal and the Municipal level and elections have consequences at a Co-Op board, a school board, a board of directors, and even at a Shul. If an effective, competent good leader is elected, the community and the organization is rewarded. If an incompetent, ignorant, self-promoting, or disingenuous leader is elected, the community and the organization are ultimately punished. 
          This Shabbat, we read from Parsha Korach. Korach was Moshe and Aaron’s cousin. “ tribe of Levi. Korach questioned Moshe's authority eventually leading a rebellion. Korach did question Moshe’s authority in a private meeting between individuals. Rather, Korach gathered 250 supporters, and then publicly challenged Moshe. Moshe tried to keep peace within the community but to no avail. A divine test is administered, and Korach and his supporters fail. The earth swallows them up. However, God is angry and a plague falls upon the people. They are communally punished for Korach's actions, their passive support, and their failure to bond together against Korach. Yet the people are still not convinced that Moshe and Aharon should remain in charge, only that Korach was unworthy. So a second divine test is administered this time with 12 rods stuck in the ground and almond branches resulting in Aaron’s staff, thus symbolizing that God has chosen Aharon to be the Kohen Gadol.  The Parsha concludes with God speaking to Aharon and re-iterating his obligations in terms of the Mishkan, the Altar, and the Tent of the Meeting. 
           The Parsha offers a benchmark for evaluating conflict. The Talmudic sages explain that conflicts disagreements and different opinions are to be expected    There are conflicts and disagreements that are “Shem Shamayim” (in the Name of Heaven) and there are those that are not in the name of heaven.  Korach’s rebellion, according to the Talmudic Sages, was not in the name of heaven.  The Parsha begins like any disagreement or a rebellion should begin: and an aggrieved person tries to convince others that they, too, are aggrieved.  VaYikach Korach ben Yitzhar Ben Kahat ben Levi v’ Datan V’Aviram B’nai Eliav V’On ben Pelet Bnai Reuven – Korach son of Itzhar son of Kohath son of Levi took Datan and Aviram.  By the end of the “Rebellion”, Moshe has attempted to make peace by bowing his head to the ground in front of Korach and God is seething VaYidaber Hashem  El Moshe V’Aharon Leimor, HiBadlu MiToch Ha’Edah HaZot  Va’Achaleh Otam K’Ragah - And Hashem spoke to Moshe and Aaron saying; separate yourselves from this congregation so that I may consume them in a moment.  VaYiplu Al Peneihem VaYomru Eil Elohei HaRuchot L’Chol Basar HaIsh Echad YeCheta V’Al Kol Ha’Edahg Tiktzof - and they fell upon their faces and said, “O’ God, God of the spirits and all flesh, shall one man sin, and You be angry with the entire assembly? (Num.14:20-21) The answer of course is yes. This is why God urged everyone to separate themselves from Korach, and those who did not would be punished as well.
          Yes, the people were misled by a disingenuous Korach. Indeed, Korach’s accusation that Moshe and Aaron were “lording” themselves over the community, resonated with those who followed Korach. The consequences were revealing. Moshe interceded on behalf of the community in order to minimize the communal guilt and punishment. Korach and his followers were punished.  However, the shine on Moshe’s leadership had been tarnished and his leadership would continue to be challenged until B’nei Israel’s arrival in Eretz Canaan. No, Korach’s rebellion did not succeed. Even so, the community was punished. Imagine what would have happened if Korach had succeeded. Well, it seems that there are enough examples of leaders who came to power through grievance, there are enough examples of leaders who are mostly concerned with themselves and not the welfare of the community, and there are plenty examples of leaders who spread KoRaCh spiritual baldness or emptiness as part of their own agenda. It is up to everybody else to speak out against such leaders and to distance themselves from such leaders not only for their own welfare but the welfare of the community or the organization.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

Let's See With Our Heart These Things Our Eyes Have Seen (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "Blues For Allah")

          Our grade 12 daughter just participated in her high school graduation. Covid -19 forced her, her classmates, and the school to re-adjust what a graduation ceremony would look like. My wife and several other mothers reached out to the school and pointed out other high school graduations that would be more than picking up a diploma at the school parking lot, or sitting in front of a computer on a Zoom graduation ceremony. So we decorated our minivan, drove to a drive-in movie theatre, and along with her classmates, as well as a live stream audience of extended family members (including her oldest sister, her grandparents, aunts uncles and cousins watched, listened, cheered and honked our car horn as our daughter received her diploma as well as an award. Certainly, we are proud parents. Mostly however we recognize that she is about to embark on the next chapter of her life as she continues to develop life skills and, in a sense, leadership skills.
          This week's Parsha is Shlach Lecha. Several disparate events occur in this Parsha. First, we read the story of Moshe sending Twelve Spies (one representing each tribe) into Eretz Canaan. Their mission was to ascertain the lay of the land, the strength of the inhabitants, and the fertility of the land. Except for Joshua and Caleb, the remaining ten spies returned with a negative report. The people heard this and wanted to return to Egypt. As a result of both the report and B'nai Yisroel's response, this generation was prohibited from entering the land. Next, we read about the laws concerning the taking of Challah, a fire offering, a burnt offering, feast offering. We read about the offering required for unintentional sin. After this brief discussion about ritual, B'nai Yisroel is reminded about the ethical treatment of native members of the community or proselytes. Then we read about who desecrates Shabbat by gathering wood on Shabbat.  Like the person who acts high handedly, this man was removed from the camp and punished with death. The Parsha concludes with a familiar passage that we know as the 3rd paragraph of the Shemah. We are commanded to wear tzitzit in order to remind us of three ideas: God's commandments, not to follow our eyes and our hearts (which will lead us astray), and God brought us out of Egypt (Num. 15:37-41).
          While reading the spies report, Numbers 13:27-29, and 13:31-33., we find out that the land is flowing with milk and honey and plenty of fruit. We find out that the native tribes dwell in fortified cities. We are told the names of the indigenous tribes and their geographical location. The tone suggests that these tribes are quite strong.  In the second part of their report, we are told that these spies do not think that B’nai Israel is physically capable of conquering this land and these indigenous tribes, for they are giants “and we were like grasshoppers in our eyes and so we were in their eyes (13:33) One spy, in one verse 13:30 publicly expresses disagreement with the spies. Caleb is the voice of dissent, Caleb speaks out. Caleb is heroic and inspiring.  However the Talmudic sages in the Tosefta comment that the first part of the report: “We came to the land and it flows with milk and honey and this is its fruit” was offered by Joshua. The rest of the report, except for 13:30 was offered by the other 10 spies.  Why do the Talmudic sages bring Joshua into the narrative and by doing so diminish Caleb’s powerful and passionate heroic voice? Indeed Joshua was Moshe’s choice. We know that one of the spies received special treatment from Moshe. Joshua was one of the spices and Moshe had renamed him. Clearly Joshua was Moshe’s eyes and ears on this mission and we know that Joshua will be one to assume the mantle of leadership. Even at this time, Joshua was being groomed for leadership. However, the dissenting opinion was not offered by Joshua; it was offered by Caleb. Caleb was the spy who went off on his own and went to Hebron to the Caves of the Machpela to “visit” the ancestors: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Sarah, Rebecca, and Leah. Caleb the same letters that make the word K’LeiV like the heart, Caleb speaks passionately from the heart. Also the same letters KLV which means dog. A dog barks when something appears or smells wrong, or dangerous. Joshua represents leadership within the system, cool and thoughtful, and endorsed by the establishments: Moshe and the Talmudic Sages.  Caleb represents leadership outside the system, passionate, inspiring, and challenging the majority and a voice of dissent. The Talmudic Sages bring Joshua into the text because the Talmudic Sages understand that both types of leadership: Cool and Passionate, working within the system and a voice of dissent; both types of leadership are required depending upon the situation.
         For our daughter, as she graduates during a time when people have taken to the streets to express a desire for social justice while other leaders deal with the cold analysis of numbers and fighting a pandemic, we see both styles of leadership are vital. Whatever the style, both types of leadership require a desire for truth, a desire to improve make society better, and a desire to care for society’s most vulnerable. As our daughter begins the next phase of her life, we hope that she incorporates both types of leadership so that way she remains true to herself, her values and strives to make the part of the world that she touches a better place.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

Though I Could Not Caution All, I Still Might Warn A Few ( Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia "Ship Of Fools)

          Our eldest daughter moved to Austin, Texas in order to manage a congressional campaign.  Before she embarked on her drive, I did the typical dad thing. I told her to make sure to bring the car in for a going over, make sure that everything worked perfectly, and when she was driving, make sure that the indicator lights are functioning properly.  Of course, her response was to roll her eyes and remind me that moving to a new city to work on a political campaign was not new for her or for me. She has been doing this for eight years. She has lived all over the U.S: north, south, east, west, coastal states, landlocked states, primarily agricultural states as well as big cities. Yet this move, from Boston to Austin, seemed different. It was different for three reasons. It was different because of the Covid 19 Pandemic, it was different because a video lasting 8:40 from Minneapolis shined a light on a racial pandemic that has burned for centuries. Her move was different because she was moving to Austin Texas. Make no mistake, Austin is a cosmopolitan place with a huge university, a thriving economy, a great music scene, and stereotypically has been a liberal-leaning place like most large cities in the north and on the two coasts.  However, Austin is in Texas, and because of my bias and my being a history buff, I appreciate that Texas is just different. As a dad, my worries were and remain simple yet existential. She has moved to a place where the Governor’s desire to “open early” has resulted in a spike of those being stricken with Covod-19. She has moved to a state where putting a mask is a statement of politics rather than a statement regarding the sanctity of life. She has moved to a state that doesn’t seem to respect a women’s right to choose but protects everyone’s right to own a firearm. My daughter reminded me that was precisely why she chose to manage this particular congressional campaign.  In terms of her car,  the drive from Boston to Austin was uneventful. The car ran fine,  and she paid attention to the warning lights.

          This morning we read from Parsha BaHalotcha. This Shabbat we read from Parsha Bahalotcha. For the previous two Parshiot, Bemidbar and Naso, Bnai Yisroel has counted and prepared for their journey from Sinai to Eretz Canaan. This week, the final preparations are ordered and executed and the departure from Sinai begins. Aaron, Moshe’s brother and the Kohen Gadol, lights the lamp for the Mishkan, the entire Levite tribe is purified, offerings made and their service for maintenance of the Mishkan begins. Final instructions for observing Pesach under these new conditions, (they were not leaving Egypt anymore nor had they arrived in the land) were offered, including the case of coming into contact with the deceased and becoming spiritually impure. The narrative tells us the manner in which Bnai Yisroel traveled: sheltered by a cloud during the day and protected by a pillar of fire at night. Then the complaining begins. They complain about the Mannah. They complain about the food. They complain about Moshe’s leadership. Moshe’s sister complains about his wife.

          As Bnai Yisroel finally begins its trek from Sinai towards Canaan, the Torah makes the following statement.  Vayehi Binsoah Ha’Aron VaYomer Moshe, Kuma Adoshem VeYaFuTzu Oyavecha, VeYaNuSu Misanecha MiPanecha. U’vNucho Yomar Shuva Adoshem Rivvot Alfei Yisroel – When the Ark would journey, Moshe said: ‘Arise Hashem, and let Your foes be scattered let those who hate You flee from before You. And when it rested, he would say, ‘reside tranquilly, O Hashem, among the myriad thousands of Israel. (Num. 10:35) Today we say the first part of the verse while we take the Torah out from the Aron before we read the Torah, and we say the second part of the statement when we have finished reading from the Torah and are returning it to the Aron.  In the Torah, this verse is enclosed by two brackets. The bracket is really an inverted letter, the letter “Nun”.   The Talmud in Shabbat 116a teaches us Mipnei Sh’ Sefer Chashuv Hu Bifnei Atzmo – Because it constituted a book on its own. This is a rather cryptic statement since it suggests that there are more than 5 books comprising the Torah. We normally think of the Torah as comprised of 5 Books (Breishit- Genesis, Shmot –Exodus, Vayikra – Leviticus, Bemidbar-Numbers, Devarim-Deuteronomy). Now the Talmud is suggesting that there is another book? 

          Perhaps the brackets are the indicator lights. The verse within the brackets is the one section of the User’s Manual that will constantly be referred to during this one aspect of the journey. Originally this journey was supposed to be a few weeks or months at the most. B’nai Yisroel had not yet been punished with 40 years of “wandering in the desert’.  Most of the Torah’s instructions were given in anticipation of B’nai Yisroel’s eventual arrival in Canaan. In the meantime, this is the verse that they will need to refer to, this is the section of the user manual that B’nai Yisroel will need in order to survive until their eventual arrival. In reality, this is the “Book” that they would use each day that they traveled, and each day that they would temporarily rest.  In today’s reality, there are all kinds of warning lights. There have been warning lights in terms of Covid 19. Certainly, there have been warning lights regarding race. For my daughter, there were plenty of other warning lights on her drive down and even in Texas. There were protests in the various cities she spent the night: Louisville and Little Rock. While wearing a mask, she received looks and sneers. She saw people behaving as if there was neither racial tension nor a pandemic.  Some people have chosen to ignore the warning lights.  Yet ignoring the warning lights doesn’t mean that a problem does not exist. Thankfully, my daughter pays attention to all the warning lights, heeds them, and wants to fix the problems.

Peace, 
Rav Yitz 

But The Darkness Never Goes From Some Men's Eyes (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Throwing Stones")

          There have been so many disturbing images that have left our children riveted to the news.  Our eldest daughter works in politics and runs campaigns. However, our three younger children, all of whom are in their late teens, have generally been less politically aware. Now, with the disturbing events and images, our dinner conversations focus upon race, democracy, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, the right to demonstrate, the extent of police authority, the extent of Presidential authority, states rights, fascism, recognizing the difference between peaceful protesters and rioters, and of course the police response to both.  We have watched the shocking image of a police officer squeeze the life out of an African American man.  We have watched peaceful demonstrations throughout American cities and now in Toronto, Montreal, London, and Paris. We have watched looting, we have watched rioting, we have watched the police break up peaceful demonstrations by shooting rubber bullets, pepper spray and tear gas as well as a successful rocket launch with two U.S. astronauts. As our children watched these images, I reminded them that none of those images are new. We have seen images of African American men killed before in their own lifetime (Eric Garner eg.).  I reminded my children that in the 1960’s there were student protests in Paris, civil rights and anti-Viet Nam War protests throughout the United States and rockets and astronauts going off into space. There were vicious dogs and fire hoses turned onto civil rights protesters. There were riots after a black man was killed (Martin Luther King) throughout the United States. Even before King’s assassination, there were race riots in Detroit, Watts, Newark to name a few just a few places. The police beat non-violent protesters in Chicago and Birmingham, and the National Guard killed four anti-war protesters at Kent State University.  There were even angry white men who stood in front courthouses and state capitol buildings to speak out against the “rioters”.  Unfortunately, it does not appear that too much has changed since the tumultuous decade of the 1960’s.   I pointed out that there I have seen only two new types of images that I don’t recall ever seeing. One new image has diffused the tension between the police and the protesters. I pointed out in places like Houston, New York, Atlanta, Denver, and Flint, Michigan the police have “taken a knee”  or have marched alongside the peaceful demonstrators, and, by doing so, have diffused a tense situation.  The other image laid bare an amoral cynical soul and utter lack of character in an elected official. The image, which I had never seen anything like before was of the President standing on the steps of St. John’s Church, brandishing a bible,  doing his best impression of Mussolini’s scowl. Funny thing, the bible was handed to him by his Jewish daughter Ivanka. Maybe she could have given him a verse to quote, something, anything so that he wouldn’t have stood there like an utter buffoon making a mockery of the Constitution, the Bible,  a house of worship, and the country itself. If she gave him a pasuk, he might have been able to dial down the temperature instead of talking about vicious dogs, mass arrests.

          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Naso. The Parsha’s 176 psukim make it among the longest single parshiot in the entire Torah.  Its length is also reflected in the wide variety of topics covered including the census for the tribe of Levi, the Priestly tribe, the responsibilities for the maintenance and operation of the Mishkan, the purification of the camp,  the treatment of the wayward wife (the Sotah), the vow of the Nazir ( a vow that limits the behavior of the individual as a means of elevating oneself to a higher level of holiness for only a limited time),  the identical tribal offerings made by each leader in order on twelve successive days that celebrated the fact that the Mishkan was “open for business”. Inserted in these seemingly disparate rules and narratives are the priestly benediction. A quick glance at the different components of Parsha Naso suggests that each is connected to each other because of the idea of Naso – “lift up”. Indeed each component discussed issues of how we can raise ourselves up in holiness, either through our own actions or the actions of the other. 

          The Priestly benediction is an example of a third party elevating us, or at least offering supplication to God on our behalf that we indeed are worthy of blessing.  From that perspective, I can’t imagine a more powerful ritual for parents to do with their children. Yevarechecha Adoshem VaYishmarecha, May Hashem bless you and keep you. Ya' eir Adoshem Panav Eilecha VaYichuneka, May Hashem make His face shine upon you and be gracious to you Yisa Adoshem Panav Eilecha VaYaSem Lecha Shalom May Hashem lift his countenance upon you and give you peace. ( Num 6:24-26). What does it mean that God should “keep" our children or “guard” our children? Naturally, as parents invoking Hashem to protect our children seems like a great idea given all the tsuris in the world. Yet Rashi, the great 11th-century French commentator explains that this first blessing is not Hashem protecting our children. Rather the “blessing” should be the blessing enumerated in the Torah, that our children should be materially well off and Hashem should “protect” our children and their material blessings from those who might take such blessing. The second blessing which speaks of “shining Hashem’s face upon” our child is our desire for our children to become enlightened by Torah and a meaningful relationship with Hashem. The “gracious” is the subliminal understanding that all we can ask for is that our children have an intellectual and spiritual ability to learn Torah and connect to Hashem; we hope Hashem was gracious in giving our children plenty of ability in order to receive such “light”.  The third blessing is perhaps the most relevant for parents and children. Rashi explains that “lifting His countenance to you” means that Hashem should suppress His anger. One could also understand that that the light of the enlightenment we seek is the gift of God raising his face up towards us so that we can cast aside or let go of our anger and hatred in order that our souls shall be at peace in this world.  Both interpretations suggest that we desire for our children to at peace, to be Shaleim, to be whole and complete. Anger and hatred prevent Shleimah – wholeness, harmony, peace. 

Indeed, imagine if Ivanka had not only handed her dad the Bible but indicated to him that she had put a marked the chapter and verse that he should cite. Imagine if he had given a blessing and said those words. Those words are well known by Jews and non-Jews. Those words are simple.  Those are words that invoke God’s care and concern.  Those are words that bring people together. Those are words that offer sustenance. Those are words that offer hope.  Those words are said by the Kohen to the congregation during the three pilgrimage festivals. I say those words to my children every Friday night. Those words I say in our family WhatsApp when our children are not home with us on Shabbat. Coming from Trump, those are words that would sound so incredibly disingenuous. Coming from Trump, those words would sound almost blasphemous. Maybe standing there with a bible and scowling, is the clearest display of Trump’s complete lack of character and his amoral soul. That image, of an amoral President with no character, no beliefs, just a need for cynical self-promotion, maybe that is the most troubling and unique image of the past week.
 
Peace, 

Rav Yitz