When The Battle Is Fought And The Victory's Won We Can All Shout Together, We Have Overcome (Robert Johnson - "My Sisters and Brothers")

          For the past week or two, the late Congressmen John Lewis’ coffin crossed the Edmund Pettis Bridge 55 years after he originally crossed it on Bloody Sunday in Selma Alabama in 1965.  John Lewis lied in State in Washington D.C.’s Capitol Rotunda. John Lewis lied in State in Atlanta before his funeral and burial this past Thursday. His funeral occurred on Tisha B’Av, the day that commemorates the destruction and mourning of the Holy Temple in Jerusalem.  Prior to his death, Congressman John Lewis wrote his final words and asked the New York Times to publish his words on the day of his funeral, July 30th.  In his final words, Lewis reminds a nation and all people who struggle for a free society: “You must also study and learn the lessons of history because humanity has been involved in this soul-wrenching,  existential struggle for a very long time… The truth does not change, and that is why the answers worked out so long ago can help you find solutions  to the challenges of our time,,, So I say to you, walk with the wind, brothers, and sisters, and let the spirit of everlasting love be your guide.” 

          This Shabbat is Parsha V’Etchanan also known as Shabbat Nachamu ( the Shabbat of comfort). It is always the Parsha that immediately follows Tisha B’Av (the Ninth of Av), the day in which we commemorate the destruction of both the First and Second Temple. The Parsha is a continuation of Moshe Rabeinu’s lecture to Bnai Yisroel. While last week’s Parsha, Devarim featured Moshe gently castigating and criticizing Bnai Yisroel; in Parsha V’Etchanan, Moshe urges and cajoles Bnai Yisroel to learn from their hardships. Moshe explains that the hardships that Bnai Yisroel already faced and will face in the future are a direct function of their following God’s Torah. Good things will happen when they followed God’s Torah, and not so good things will happen when they don’t follow God’s Torah. Failure to follow the Torah will result in exile, however, there will always be the opportunity to learn from those mistakes and return to the land and to the relationship with God.

          Moshe reiterates the Ten Commandments and his experience at Sinai. Then Moshe explains that while he can speak of the Ten Commandments and share his experience, Bnai Yisroel will now have to pass this information and these commandments in a very different way than sharing a firsthand experience of the revelation of Sinai. Instead, this generation, the generation that did not stand at Sinai, will have to teach the meaning of these words, ideas, and commandments, to their children and live by them. V’Shinantam Levanecha V’Dibarta Bam, B’Shivtecha, B’Veitecha, Uv’Lectecha VaDerech, U’Veshachbecha U’vKumecha. – And you shall teach them [these words] thoroughly to your children and you shall speak of them while you sit in your home, while you walk on the way, when you go to sleep and when you arise. The sages explain that a person’s devotion to Torah is exemplified by the priority given to teaching “these words” and “these values” to one’s children. Teaching can occur through words. Teaching can occur through deeds. Teaching can occur through positive behavior, that is to say, emulate modeled behavior. Teaching can occur through negative behavior, that is to say, learn from the mistakes of the previous generation. 

          John Lewis’ final words embody the words of Prophets, urging, cajoling, and beseeching the next generation to take up the mantle, to move forward, and to always follow the arc of history bent towards freedom. I have always wondered about Moshe telling Bnai Yisroel to V’Ahavta et Adoshem Elokecha. John Lewis’s final words and philosophy of non-violence that he preached and lived by clarifies Moshe’s words. For how else can one take up the mantle of non-violence without “loving the Lord your God”? John Lewis modeled behavior that makes a community and a society better. His final words resonate the words of Moshe Rabeinu but most of all they resonate the hope that the next generation, the generation that listens to these words and strives to live by these words and this code, has within itself, the strength, and the courage to make the community sacred and holy

Peace,

Rav Yitz

Things Went Down We Don't Understand But I Think In Time We Will (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "New Speedway Boogie")

          I should be upbeat, perhaps even happy. Baseball has returned this week. Something that suggests “normal”, something that suggests a seasonal means by keeping track of time (a schedule, box scores to check in the morning, or a big weekend series). Yet, I am deeply troubled. We have been watching what has been happening in Portland. We have watched as federal troops, who are not part of the U.S. armed forces but rather from other Federal agencies such as Border Patrol and Department of Homeland Security, etc., in unmarked battle, fatigues have fired upon non-violent protesters, who have arrested non-violent protesters. My family and I have watched, I have welled up in tears. I pity the United States and I am proud to be living in Canada. I am disgusted that this “President” behaves like a South American dictator of the 1970s and 1980s, I am disgusted that this “President” behaves like an Eastern European Communist Dictator during the Cold War. I am disgusted that this “President” behaves like those European fascist dictators in Europe during the 1920s and ’30s. I am repulsed by this “President” behaving like dictators in Russia, Hungary, Turkey, and Syria. In Tom Friedman’s op-ed July 21 piece entitled “Trump’s Wag The Dog War”, enumerates the troubling and even treasonous response of responding to the most sacred and American right as explicitly written in the United States Constitution: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Leadership, or at least, the leadership that used to exist prior to this “President” respected the Constitution, and peaceful assembly is a sacred American right to be defended. Also, if the leader is really smart and forward-thinking, he/ she will listen to those protesters and make the effort to understand the reason for the grievance and protest and try to fix it.

          This week’s Parshah is Devarim, which is the first Parshah of the Book of Deuteronomy or Sefer Devarim. Moshe recounts in very wide brushstrokes, the experience of the generation that fled Egypt. Very few details are given. In fact, Moshe begins the story at the foot of Sinai; however, the name is changed from Sinai to Horev. In his recounting, Moshe speaks as a participant in this national experience, not in the third person. This is quite different from the Moshe we have seen. Until now he spoke as a prophet. God told him and he told B'nai Yisroel. Now Moshe displays a certain amount of freedom. When Moshe speaks, he places himself in the center of the story. Moshe speaks using words such as “I”, “we”, and “you”. Now God has become the third party. Perhaps this is best expressed when Moshe begins his "telling" by gently rebuking B'nai Yisroel. The language is in terms of what B'nai Yisroel did to him as well as God. "V'Omar Aleichem Ba'Eit HaHi Leimor Lo Uchal L'vadi Se'Eit Etchem: "I said to you at the time, saying, 'I cannot carry you alone…How can I carry your contentiousness your burdens and your quarrels" (Deut. 1:9,12). Moshe subtly and gently begins to point out how rebellious their parents behaved during the past forty years. He reminds this generation how the first generation rebelled while God provided, and cared for them. The message to this new generation is clear. Our parents may have made mistakes, but God never abandoned us. This generation learns that they too will make mistakes and will know that God won't abandon them. God will always work with them.

          We know that God wanted to destroy and abandon his people on occasion (Ex. 32:10 and Num. 11:1-3), yet he did not. The subtlety and the gentility of Moshe's rebuke lies in the fact that he did not mention this. Neither does Moshe go into any type of detail concerning Bnai Yisroel’s rebellious behavior. Rashi, the 11th-century Northern French commentator, asked the same question that you are asking right now.  What was the nature of "Eilu HaD'varim-These Words"? Why did Moshe purposefully leave out the embarrassing details and instead shade his language so gently? Rashi explains L'fi Sh'hein Divrei Tochachat Umanah Kaan Kol Hamkomot Sh'hichisu Lifnei HaMakom Bahen, Lefichach Satam Et Ha'Devarim…Mipnei Chevodecha Shel Yisroel - Since these are words of reproof, and he enumerates here all the places in which they provoked the Omnipresent, therefore he conceals the matters (in which they sinned and mentions them by allusion) contained in the names of these places out of respect for Israel."  Rashi is of the opinion that Moshe's intent was to teach. He wanted to explain to this new generation what had happened. Embarrassment and humiliation would have no purpose. No matter what their parents had done, God maintained his covenant. No matter what their parents had done, God would not visit their sins upon this generation. Besides, B'nai Yisroel was designated in the book of Leviticus as a holy nation, a nation of priests. Therefore Moshe must show this generation the appropriate respect. He cannot be ill-tempered and rebuke them for what their parents had done.

          Moshe understood that God instills this holiness in all of us. So whether or not our predecessors behaved inappropriately at particular times, whether or not our predecessors behaved wrongly, we are foolish if we don't try to learn from that example. Learning will be effective when we are empowered rather than embarrassed or humiliated. Even if a rebuke is required, it can be done in a way that neither demeans, embarrasses the person, or violates such sacred Constitutional rights. History is full of leaders who behaved otherwise and failed, including all those fascist dictators in Europe prior to and during WWII, all those Cold War Eastern European dictators, all those failed Communist and right-wing Fascist dictators in South America, and the long list of Middle East brutal dictators in the 20th and 21st century from Libya, Iraq, to Iran and Syria. Indeed, it will be nice to watch baseball and return to “normal”. It will be even nicer when there is a President who can resume the noble experiment of democracy.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

Still I Know I Lead The Way, They Tell Me Where I Go (John Barlow & Bob Weir- "Estimated Prophet")

          Like millions, our family watched Hamilton on TV. Much of what we learned was a lesson in and the complexity of leadership. With the help of excellent music and witty lyrics, we learned that leadership is sometimes a complex mixture of personal ambition, circumstances, and opportunities. Eventually, leadership is a desire to improve the lives of others and make a community or a society a better place. This was evident in much of Hamilton’s essays that comprised the majority of the Federalist Papers and ultimately provided the framework for President James Madison’s writing of the U.S. Constitution. Just how sacred is this the importance of leadership? It is evident in the Presidential Oath of Office. The U.S. Constitution in Article II Section 1 Clause 8 states: “Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:- ‘I do solemnly swear  (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.’”  Keeping in mind that the Constitution not only speaks for the People, the document is the people’s voice, words, and sentiments regarding American society:  “We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union….” By upholding the oath of office, the leader, the President is preserving, protecting, and defending the people, their lives, and their community.  Failure to uphold the oath and the words of the constitution is a failure to lead a failure to protect and defend the lives of the people. Trying to abolish health care in the face of a Pandemic is NOT protecting the people. Forcing public schools to re-open in an unsafe environment in the face of a pandemic is NOT protecting the people. NOT confronting Vladimir Putin about placing a bounty on U.S. soldiers is tantamount to NOT protecting and defending. When, after four months since the Covid 19 Pandemic came to North America, states, counties, and hospitals are still struggling to obtain PPV and the Executive Branch (led by the President) has NOT established a national plan to increase the supply of PPV is a failure to protect and defend. Defending the symbols of the Confederacy, the public display of Confederate generals who committed treason by fighting against the Union, and attempting to stop the military from renaming military bases named after Confederate generals who committed treason by fighting against the Union FAILS to protect the constitution and its citizens.
           This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few psukim (verses) of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and is poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc).
          Soon after adjudicating the case of Tzlofchad’s daughters, Moshe demonstrates his concern for the people’s future. Keenly aware that he is prohibited entry into Eretz Canaan, Moshe worries and wonders about his successor. VaYidaber Moshe El Hashem Leimor - Moshe spoke to God saying, Yifkod HaShem Elohei HaRuchot L’Chol Basar Ish Al Ha’Eidah - May Hashem, God of the spirits of all flesh, appoint a man over the assembly, Asher Yeitzei Lifneihem  Va Yavo Lifneihem Va’Asher Yotzieim Va’Asher YeVieim V’Lo Tiheyeh Adat Adoshem KaTzon Asher Ein Lahem Roeh - who shall go out before them and come in before them, who shall take them out, and bring them in and let the Assembly of HaShem not be like sheep that have no shepherd (Num. 27:15-17).   The Or HaChayim (Rabbi Chayim Ibn Attar), the 18th-century Moroccan commentator and kabbalist, explains Moshe’s selfless perspective of leadership by citing the Talmud in Nedarim 39b. When a person visits the sick, it removes 1/60th of the illness provided that the visitor is the same age as the patient. Why? Because the visitor is the same age, and at the same stage of life, he/she is able to empathize with the patient. That ability to empathize is vital in alleviating the pain, sorrow, and sadness of the patient. The Or HaChayim also points out that in the Book of Judges, each Judge only judged his/her tribe. Having grown up in the tribe, and being a product of that particular tribe’s “context”, that judge would have the appropriate degree of empathy. Moshe understood that the leader must be able to connect to each member of the community as individuals in order to blend that individual into the greater community. A shepherd is able to demonstrate concern and lead the entire flock as well as empathy and concern for the individual.
          Both the Torah and the Constitution are pretty clear about the role of leadership. Leadership is all about service, leadership is all about protecting and defending the people, the assembly, the flock. Leadership is not about self-enrichment, self-aggrandizement, or self-promotion. A leader must be selfless, not selfish. A leader cannot be concerned about his future political prospects. Rather, the leader must focus on the present, on the task at hand, protecting and defending the people, the assembly, and the flock today. Any behaviour that purposefully detracts from protecting, defending, or preserving the welfare of the flock, constitutes a failure of leadership. So when the President puts millions at risk with his lack of concern and empathy for those who have been stricken with Covid 19 or have perished from this virus, or permits a bounty to be placed upon servicemen, or tries to deny the health insurance of millions during this pandemic, or protects and defends the racists, the conspiracy theorists and any other group that either diminishes or obstructs the attempt to create more perfect union is derelict in his duties. In some cases, such behaviour should be considered treasonous. In lhe meantime, a country will behave as if there is no shepherd and the flock will remain directionless with some moving in a safe direction in an attempt to make their smaller group safe.

Peace 
Rav Yitz
 

Believe It If You Need It, If You Don't Just Pass It On (Robert Hunter & Phil Lesh - "Box of Rain")

          Our daughter just turned twenty this week. Because of the Covid 19 Pandemic caused summer camps to close; our daughter celebrated her birthday at home. I think that the last time she was home for her birthday was our first year in Toronto when she attended day camp. That was eleven years ago. Yes, of course, her mother did everything she could to make our daughter’s birthday special. In fact, it began last Shabbos and continued right on into Sunday.  The whole weekend,  I was keenly aware that I was sharing participating in something that I usually don’t get to participate in. The moment first struck me last Erev Shabbos when I blessed her. Every Friday Night, I bless our children. With our University age student home since the Pandemic began in March, I have had the opportunity to bless her along with her younger sister and brother. However this last Friday Night, my blessing seemed different. The words were the same, but because we were both aware that on this particular Shabbat, this time seemed different.  As I blessed her, I thought about her turning twenty. I thought about her making her way through university, directed, and enthusiastic about her studies. I thought about my own mortality and all my children. I thought about what, if anything, they will inherit.
          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few psukim (verses) of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and is poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc).
          Following the narrative of Pinchas and the second census taken in the book of Bemidbar; two narratives occur. One narrative involves the daughters of Tzlophchad and one narrative involves Moshe. Both deal with inheritance. In the case of the daughters of Tzlophchad, there were no sons to inherit Tzlophchad’s portion in Eretz Canaan. In the case of Moshe, he had sons whom he had hoped would succeed him as the leader, much like Aaron’s sons and grandsons ultimately succeeded him as the Kohen Gadol. The daughters make it clear that their father did not die during the various plagues. Rather he died in the Wilderness, (commentators explain that he was the person picking up sticks on Shabbat and was punished with death for having violated the Shabbat). The daughters’ argument was that his punishment should not effect his rightful portion, Avinu Meit BaMidbar V’Hu Lo Hayah B’Toch Ha’Eidah HaNoadim Al Adoshem B’Adat Korach Ki v’Cheto Meit U’Vanim Lo Hayu Lo – Our father died in the Wilderness, but he was not among the assembly that was gathering against Hashem in the assembly of Korach, but he died of his own sin; he had no son. Lamah Yigra Shem Avinu MiToch Mishpachto Ki Ein Lo Bein T’nah Lanu Achuzah B’Toch Achei Avinu – Why should the name of our father be omitted from among his family because he had no son? Give us a possession among our father’s brothers. Quite cleverly, the daughters explain that their father did not participate in any rebellion against Moshe’s nor God’s authority. Rather he committed and the individual sin that led to his death. However, that should not preclude him nor his family from receiving land. Clearly, this was entirely new and Moshe had no idea how to solve this precedent-setting legal issue.  VaYakreiv Moshe et Mishpatan Lifnei Hashem – So Moshe brought their claim to Hashem. However, a hint as to decision exists in the word Mishpatan (their claim). The last letter of the word is written in a bold font compared to the rest of the Torah letters. This special letter designating the daughters tells us that the daughters were meritorious and worthy of making the claim. They did so in a respectful manner mindful of the law and willing to work within the system.  Immediately after the narrative, Moshe asks about entering the land and is reminded that he is prohibited. He asks about his successor. He suggests the qualities that the leader should possess “who shall go out before them and come in before them, who shall take them out and bring them in; and let the assembly of the Hashem not be like sheep that have no shepherd (Num 27:17) God’s answer is direct and unequivocal. Kach Lecha et Yehoshua ben Nun Take for yourself Joshua son of Nun. According to Rashi, Moshe had hoped that his sons would have been worthy and chosen to succeed him. However, Moshe had to “take for himself” Joshua as though Joshua were his own son.
          Moshe had everything to pass down to his successor. Tzlophchad’s daughters sensed that their father’s name to be  “omitted” from the census and lose out on his portion in Eretz Canaan. Nowhere in the Torah do we hear or read about Moshe’s sons doing anything. We read about Aaron’s sons, we read about Aaron’s grandson, Pinchas. We read about Tzlophchad’s daughters. We read about Joshua and Caleb. We read about those who have Zchut (merit) and those who don’t have Zchut, there is only silence. Tzlophchad never knew had a claim on his portion. Moshe wasn’t aware that he could pass his leadership to Joshua. As I blessed my twenty-year-old, I realize that “inheritance” isn’t necessarily about what the parent or grandparent has to pass down to the younger generation. When I bless our children, I realize now that I am passing to my children that which I inherited from my grandparents and my parents. Our children will inherit any wisdom that we have acquired from our parents, our grandparents, and from our own experiences.

Peace
Rav Yitz

Some Come To Laugh Their Past Away Some Come To Make It Just One More Day (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "Franklin's Tower")

          This week, a 98-year-old man passed away. However, he did not pass away due to the Corona Virus. He went to sleep and didn’t wake up the next morning. I remember this man from my childhood. I remember him on television. I remember listening to comedy records with my dad, as this man and his co-writer and partner performed incredibly funny and poignant comedic sketches. Years later, I listened to those same comedic sketches with my daughters and son and again laughed hysterically. There were even moments when three generations: my father, my children, and listened and laughed together. Carl Reiner passed away earlier this week. He and his long time partner Mel Brooks created numerous skits including The 2000 Year Old Man and the 2013 Year Old Man. Before that, Carl Reiner brought laughter to millions when he co-wrote the Show of Shows and the Dick Van Dyke Show.  Later, my children recognized him from the Ocean’s Eleven Movies.  Regarding laughter, Reiner said, “Everybody wants to laugh, you know that. They need to laugh. People need to laugh.” Carl Reiner understood that laughter is indeed fundamental to a quality of life.
          This week we read from Parsha Chukkat. This week we read from Parsha Chukkat. This Shabbat we read from Parsha Chukkat. Chukkat begins by telling us the Law for the Red Heifer. The Priest who prepares the mixture of water and the Red Heifer's burnt ashes will render the entire nation spiritually pure; but the mixture will render him impure. Miriam passes away and there is a shortage of water.  To alleviate the water shortage, Moshe and Aharon are commanded to speak to the rock causing water to flow. However, Moshe struck the rock. While water still flowed, Moshe and Aharon would be punished for their transgression and would not be worthy enough to enter into Eretz Canaan. The Parsha records the death of Aharon, and his son’s assuming their late father’s position within the nation.  As B’nai Yisroel resumes its wandering, they are attacked by Amalek. B’nai Yisroel is forced to go around the heart of Amalek territory. The people complain to Moshe again. They try to seek permission from the Sihon, the King of the Amorites, to pass through Amorite territory. Sihon denies his permission and B’nai Yisroel attacks and eventually defeats the Amorites. Og King of Bashan tries to prevent B’nai Yisroel from marching through his land, B’nai Yisroel, with the help of Hashem, defeat King Og and his army.  The Parsha concludes with B’nai Yisroel settling on the Plains of Moab on the eastern side of the Jordan poised to enter into Canaan.
          Following the Law of the Red Heifer, The Parsha contains several distinct narratives. One focuses upon a lack of water, two focus upon the death of Moshe’s siblings. Several narratives focus upon B’nai Yisroel’s complaints about the lack of food ad water.  Between the Statute of the Red Heifer and these seemingly disparate narratives, a very subtle transition of nearly thirty-eight years occurred. VaYavo’u  B’nai Yisroel Kol HaEidah Midbar Tzin BaChodesh HaRishon VaYeishev Ha’Am B’Kadesh - And the Children of Israel, the entire assembly, arrived a the Wilderness of Zin in the first months and the people settled in Kadesh. (Num. 20:1) Rashi, the great, 11th-century French commentator comments on the phrase Kol HaEidah- Eida HaShlamah Shekvar Meitu Midbar V’Eilu Parshu LaChayim- The whole assembly, for those who were to die in the wilderness had already died, and these (who composed the current assembly) were set apart for life. Citing the Midrash Tanchuma, Rashi noticed that the phrase B’nai Yisroel Kol Ha’Eidah seems syntactically incorrect. On more than twenty occasions, including last week’s Parsha Korach, the more common phrase is Kol Adat B’nei Yisroel The entire assembly of the Children of Israel. Now this group is described as The Children of Israel, the entire assembly. While they are still the descendants of Israel (of Yaakov) this Eidah, this assembly must be composed of something different than those that were first described as  Eidah. This Eidah, this assembly is composed of those born in the wilderness. The old assembly must have died out and the 40-year punishment and wandering must be coming to its conclusion.  As we read about this new Eidah, this new assembly of B’nai Yisroel, thirty-eight years later, we read about an Eidah and assembly that seem remarkably similar to their parents and grandparents.  The first assembly (those who left Egypt) taught this new assembly to worry about the apparent lack of water. The first assembly taught this new assembly to worry about the lack of food. The first assembly worried about and dealt with Amalek. This new assembly also deals with Amalek.
          Every “new assembly” should have the opportunity to learn from the “older assembly”. Sadly, and unfortunately for this new assembly, they were “came of age’ with the death of Miriam and Aaron, the sources of their water and the sources of the sanctity of the Kehuna died with them. Upon the death of Miriam and Aaron, this “new assembly” never had to worry about water nor the Rodef Shalom of Aaron. The “older assembly” always has the distinct opportunity to mentor the younger, and teach them the “how” to do. For all of Carl Reiners’ gift of as a comedian, writer, and director, perhaps his greatest gift was as a mentor to the numerous comedians and writers that, like Carl Reiner, understood the importance and the sanctity of laughter. Perhaps the most important gift of Carl Reiner was his ability to make multiple generations share laughter together as I once did with my grandfather and father and now as I am blessed to do with my children and my parents.

Peace,
Rav Yitz