Red And White, Blue Suede Shoes; I’m Uncle Sam, How Do You Do (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia -" U.S. Blues")

           This week, Canada celebrated its national birthday and early next week, the United States will celebrate its national birthday. Both countries are the embodiment of the “New World'', a world based upon laws, democracy, and a dream that the future is genuinely brighter and more hopeful than the past. Both countries offer possibility, opportunity and aspire to create a society where one ought to be judged by the “content of character”, not by skin color, country of origin, wealth, or family connections. Both countries have always made it clear that no person is above the law: Not the poorest, not the wealthiest, not the meekest, not the most powerful.  So as my children celebrate both Canada Day and Independence Day; I feel compelled to remind them that what they should keep in mind when they celebrate is that more than any form of government more than any form of a society’s basic principle of social organization; Democracy is the holiest form of government and, besides Torah, Democracy is one of the holiest organizing principles of a society. Like Torah, in Democracy the Law is sacred, the law is Holy, and no king, no leader is above the law. Like Torah, Democracy and Law work best when it avoids fundamentalism/extremism of the left and right; but rather sticks to the middle (Deut. 28:14).

          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few Psukim of the Parsha is a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of the Moabite /Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded its 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and is poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc).

          In between the narrative of the Daughters of Tzlophchad and educating the new generation about all time-bound offerings that correspond to Shabbat, Festivals and Rosh Chodesh, Moshe makes a request of God. Acknowledging that he cannot go on forever, Moshe asks God for a successor.  Yifkod Hashem Elohei HaRuchot L’Chol Basar Eish Al Ha’Eidah, Asher Yeitzeh Lifneihem Va’Asher Yavo Lifneihem Va’Asher Yotzieim Va’Asher Y’Vieim V’Lo Tiheyeh Adat HaShem KaTzon Asher Ein LaHem Roeh - May Hashem, God of the spirits of all flesh appoint a man over the assembly, who shall go out before them and come in before them, who shall take them out and bring them in; and let the assembly of Hashem not be like sheep that have no shepherd (Num. 27:16-17). In these two verses, we learn about Moshe’s attitudes concerning the necessary qualities for leadership. A leader “ goes out before the people”, and not lead from behind. Like the shepherd, he looks after all the people including the most vulnerable members of the flock. Moshe does not foist his sons upon the people nor upon God as possible successors to Moshe. Even the way Moshe addresses God in this brief narrative suggests something less particularistic, less elitist, more “democratic” and more focused upon the content of character. Moshe refers to God as “the God of the spirits and all flesh”. Rashi explains that “God of spirits and all flesh” refers to God’s knowledge of the intricacies of the human mind, the complexities of human personality and that each individual’s character permits that person to succeed or fail in certain situations. God’s response to Moshe is simple and straightforward. God points to Joshua Asher Ruach Bo- because in him there is spirit (Num 27:18). Joshua has the necessary and appropriate character needed to lead B’nai Yisroel on the next phase of its national journey. Joshua is not from Moshe’s tribe, he is not Moshe’s son nor nephew. Joshua was evaluated solely upon the content of his character. He has Ruach Bo- the spirit within him. He possesses the right character for the job.

         No, there was no election to name Moshe’s successor, nor did the people choose. Despite that, God and Moshe taught this new generation, and every generation after, an important lesson about society. Certainly there social and religious institutions that were based upon the tribe, and upon birth. The Mishkan would be operated and maintained by the Leviim. Only descendants of Aaron, Elazar, and then Pinchas, could serve as the Kohen Gadol. Apart from the Temple and the institution of animal sacrifices,  leadership was based upon the content of character. Today, we understand that knowledge and the content of character are perhaps the most important qualities in our elected officials,  and our community leaders, especially in communities that aspire to the highest of democratic ideals. As parents, we teach our children to evaluate leaders based upon their knowledge and the content of their character, We hope that as our children make their way in the world, that they will also be judged for their knowledge and the content of their character. After all, judging one by the content of one’s character is as old as Joshua being named Moshe’s successors and as new as the noble experiments of democracy here in the “New World”.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

Still I Know I Lead The Way, They Tell Me Where I Go (John Barlow & Bob Weir- "Estimated Prophet")

          Like millions, our family watched Hamilton on TV. Much of what we learned was a lesson in and the complexity of leadership. With the help of excellent music and witty lyrics, we learned that leadership is sometimes a complex mixture of personal ambition, circumstances, and opportunities. Eventually, leadership is a desire to improve the lives of others and make a community or a society a better place. This was evident in much of Hamilton’s essays that comprised the majority of the Federalist Papers and ultimately provided the framework for President James Madison’s writing of the U.S. Constitution. Just how sacred is this the importance of leadership? It is evident in the Presidential Oath of Office. The U.S. Constitution in Article II Section 1 Clause 8 states: “Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:- ‘I do solemnly swear  (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.’”  Keeping in mind that the Constitution not only speaks for the People, the document is the people’s voice, words, and sentiments regarding American society:  “We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union….” By upholding the oath of office, the leader, the President is preserving, protecting, and defending the people, their lives, and their community.  Failure to uphold the oath and the words of the constitution is a failure to lead a failure to protect and defend the lives of the people. Trying to abolish health care in the face of a Pandemic is NOT protecting the people. Forcing public schools to re-open in an unsafe environment in the face of a pandemic is NOT protecting the people. NOT confronting Vladimir Putin about placing a bounty on U.S. soldiers is tantamount to NOT protecting and defending. When, after four months since the Covid 19 Pandemic came to North America, states, counties, and hospitals are still struggling to obtain PPV and the Executive Branch (led by the President) has NOT established a national plan to increase the supply of PPV is a failure to protect and defend. Defending the symbols of the Confederacy, the public display of Confederate generals who committed treason by fighting against the Union, and attempting to stop the military from renaming military bases named after Confederate generals who committed treason by fighting against the Union FAILS to protect the constitution and its citizens.
           This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few psukim (verses) of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and is poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc).
          Soon after adjudicating the case of Tzlofchad’s daughters, Moshe demonstrates his concern for the people’s future. Keenly aware that he is prohibited entry into Eretz Canaan, Moshe worries and wonders about his successor. VaYidaber Moshe El Hashem Leimor - Moshe spoke to God saying, Yifkod HaShem Elohei HaRuchot L’Chol Basar Ish Al Ha’Eidah - May Hashem, God of the spirits of all flesh, appoint a man over the assembly, Asher Yeitzei Lifneihem  Va Yavo Lifneihem Va’Asher Yotzieim Va’Asher YeVieim V’Lo Tiheyeh Adat Adoshem KaTzon Asher Ein Lahem Roeh - who shall go out before them and come in before them, who shall take them out, and bring them in and let the Assembly of HaShem not be like sheep that have no shepherd (Num. 27:15-17).   The Or HaChayim (Rabbi Chayim Ibn Attar), the 18th-century Moroccan commentator and kabbalist, explains Moshe’s selfless perspective of leadership by citing the Talmud in Nedarim 39b. When a person visits the sick, it removes 1/60th of the illness provided that the visitor is the same age as the patient. Why? Because the visitor is the same age, and at the same stage of life, he/she is able to empathize with the patient. That ability to empathize is vital in alleviating the pain, sorrow, and sadness of the patient. The Or HaChayim also points out that in the Book of Judges, each Judge only judged his/her tribe. Having grown up in the tribe, and being a product of that particular tribe’s “context”, that judge would have the appropriate degree of empathy. Moshe understood that the leader must be able to connect to each member of the community as individuals in order to blend that individual into the greater community. A shepherd is able to demonstrate concern and lead the entire flock as well as empathy and concern for the individual.
          Both the Torah and the Constitution are pretty clear about the role of leadership. Leadership is all about service, leadership is all about protecting and defending the people, the assembly, the flock. Leadership is not about self-enrichment, self-aggrandizement, or self-promotion. A leader must be selfless, not selfish. A leader cannot be concerned about his future political prospects. Rather, the leader must focus on the present, on the task at hand, protecting and defending the people, the assembly, and the flock today. Any behaviour that purposefully detracts from protecting, defending, or preserving the welfare of the flock, constitutes a failure of leadership. So when the President puts millions at risk with his lack of concern and empathy for those who have been stricken with Covid 19 or have perished from this virus, or permits a bounty to be placed upon servicemen, or tries to deny the health insurance of millions during this pandemic, or protects and defends the racists, the conspiracy theorists and any other group that either diminishes or obstructs the attempt to create more perfect union is derelict in his duties. In some cases, such behaviour should be considered treasonous. In lhe meantime, a country will behave as if there is no shepherd and the flock will remain directionless with some moving in a safe direction in an attempt to make their smaller group safe.

Peace 
Rav Yitz
 

Can't You See That You're Killing Each Other's Soul (Jerry Garcia - Great Cream Puff War)

Earlier in the week, I went to the hospital to do Vidui, the final confession for an elderly man whose death seemed imminent. When I arrived, his family was there including children and grandchildren. After I did the Vidui, the children and the grandchildren needed to talk. They asked me about a funeral, whom to call, and what to do. The daughter in law, holding her youngest child on her lap asked me whether or not I thought it was appropriate to bring children to the funeral and to the cemetery. Unequivocally, I said that it was absolutely appropriate to bring the children and it is important for them to be with their family during this difficult time. I explained that children need to learn how to make sense of certain life cycle events. It should not be left up to their imagination, nor should they be alone. They should be with their family, free to ask questions and express their feelings. Also, they need to learn how to deal with this kind of loss since it is something they will contend with throughout their respective lives, and being with their parents and family for the first time is the safest way to learn how to deal with this type of loss.  I explained to this young mother, that the most important gift she and her husband can provide for their children is the emotional strength to handle loss and not be afraid.  The emotions of loss: grief, sadness, sorrow, despair are part of the process of dealing with these life cycle issues in a matter of fact type of way. I asked the young mother if she wanted her children to grow up being whole and complete people. She responded that she did. I explained that to be whole and complete means that her children do not grow up being paralyzed by life and death, nor becoming so emotionally distraught that they don’t know how to live life after experiencing such a severe loss. I suggested that might be the biggest gift parents can give their children, the tools to find Peace, a Brit Shalom, Covenant of Peace.

This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few Psukim of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon Bnai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and are poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shelosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc).

Isn't it odd, or perhaps even disturbing, that Pinchas' zealousness, his subsequent spear throwing and impaling his targets is rewarded with a Brit Shalom - a Covenant of Peace and Brit Kehunat Olam - a covenant of an everlasting Priesthood? (Num. 25:12). Through our modernist lens, I imagine that most people consider or at least can understand why some may consider Pinchas act to be nothing more than fanaticism or vigilantism. The Neziv (Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Berlin Poland 1817-1893; the Rosh Yeshiva of the Volozhin Yeshiva) assumes that intrinsic to an act of vigilantism or fanaticism is a person whose soul and entire being is in turmoil and not in a state of peace.  The Neziv explains that the Brit Shalom is a guarantee of peace from an inner enemy, from whatever lurked within Pinchas that caused him to kill another human being without due process. "The Holy One, Blessed He, blessed him [Pinchas] with the attribute of peace, that he should not be quick-tempered or angry. Since it was only natural that such a deed as Pinchas' should leave in his heart intense emotional unrest afterward, the Divine blessing was designed to cope with this situation and promised peace and tranquility of the soul." We can now begin to make some sense of Brit Shalom, Covenant of Peace. Once Pinchas committed his first act of zealous defense of God's glory, perhaps it becomes easier and easier to commit a second, third or forty-eighth act in the name of God's glory. At some point, from the Neziv's perspective, the zealot's soul becomes damaged, the zealot's emotions are incapable of feelings, and the zealot's eyes become unseeing except through the lens of their zealousness, ideology, and the slavish adherence to defending its purity. The zealot, by definition, is an extremist. Jewish Law frowns upon extremism (see the laws of the Nazarite).  Precisely because the zealot does not know peace when he/she commits such an act, the only “gift” God could give Pinchas was that the tumult and turmoil within Pinchas’  soul should cease and his soul should become Shaleim whole, complete and at peace.

From this perspective, that Brit Shalom was not so much a reward of external gain as it was a reward for internal “normalcy”, the Brit Shalom and the Brit Kehunat L’Olam seem much more appropriate. Isn’t that what we wish for our children? We know that during the course of their lives there will be moments of tumult. We know that they will experience tension between their belief system and the realities of daily life. We know that they will be exposed to extreme emotions of joy, of sadness, of anguish and of anger. Pinchas received a Brit Shalom in order to manage the tumult within his soul. When parents and grandparents see their children and grandchildren's soul in spiritual and emotional tumult;  certainly they wish for nothing but Peace for their suffering children and grandchildren. Indeed, when children and grandchildren experience extreme and intense emotions that are an inevitable part of life; we pray that they will be able to return to a state of peace and contentment with themselves and their lives.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

Who'll Go Right Through The Book And Break Each And Every Law (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "I Need A Miracle")

This week, Canada celebrated Canada Day (formerly known as Dominion Day) and the United State celebrated Independence Day. Both countries are the embodiment of the “New World”, a world built upon laws, democracy and based upon a dream that the future is genuinely brighter and more hopeful than the “Old World’s” paralyzing history and restrictive social mores. Both countries offer a possibility, an opportunity and that one ought to be judged by the “content of character”, not by skin colour, country of origin, wealth, or family connections. Both countries have always made it clear that no person is above the law: Not the poorest, not the wealthiest, not the meekest, not the most powerful.  So as my children celebrate both Canada Day and Independence Day; I feel compelled to remind them that what they should keep in mind when they celebrate is that more than any form of government more than any form of a society’s basic principle of organization; Democracy is the holiest form of government and, besides Torah, Democracy is one of the holiest organizing principles of a society. Like Torah, in Democracy the Law is sacred, the law is Holy, and no king no leader is above the Law. Like Torah, Democracy and Law work best when it avoids fundamentalism/extremism of the left and right; but rather sticks to the middle (Deut. 28:14).

This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few Psukim of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha: Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behaviour by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and are poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals etc).

Isn't it odd, or perhaps even disturbing, that Pinchas' zealousness, his subsequent spear throwing and impaling his targets appears rewarded with a Brit Shalom - a Covenant of Peace and Brit Kehunat Olam - a covenant of an everlasting Priesthood? (Num. 25:12). Through our modernist lens, many readers will perceive Pinchas’ act to be nothing more than fanaticism or vigilantism. It appears as if vigilantism is rewarded. To offer Pinchas Peace and the Priesthood becomes seems incomprehensible. The NeZiV (Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Berlin Poland 1817-1893; the Rosh Yeshiva of the Volozhin Yeshiva) offers a fascinating explanation that might be valuable in today's’ age of extremists recruiting young people. The NeZiV explains that the Brit Shalom is a guarantee of peace from an inner enemy from whatever lurked within Pinchas that caused him to kill another human being without due process. "The Holy One Blessed He blessed him [Pinchas] with the attribute of peace, that he should not be quick-tempered or angry. Since it was only natural that such a deed as Pinchas' should leave in his heart an intense emotional unrest afterward, the Divine blessing was designed to cope with this situation and promised peace and tranquility of the soul." We can now begin to make some sense of these covenants. Once Pinchas committed his first act of zealous defence of God's glory, perhaps it becomes easier and easier to commit the second, third or forty-eighth act of zealous defence of God's glory. At some point, from the NeZiV's perspective, the zealot's soul becomes damaged, the zealot's emotions are incapable of feelings, and the zealot's eyes become unseeing except through the lens of their zealousness. The zealot by definition is an extremist and we know that extremism in Judaism is frowned upon and halachically unacceptable (see the laws of the Nazarite).  Precisely because the zealot does not know peace when he/she commits such an act, in Pinchas' case the only gift God could give was that the tumult of his own soul should cease and he should be whole, complete and at peace.

Yes, Pinchas saved a community from further pain and suffering by hurling that spear at Zimri and Omri. Yes, Pinchas murdered that Prince of the tribe of Shimon and that Princess Midian. The Covenant isn’t so much a reward but rather it is a salve or a balm for the tumult within Pinchas’ soul. Now, Pinchas and his descendants could ill afford to ever act as vigilantes, Pinchas and his descendants could ill afford to take on a such a fundamentalist attitude because Pinchas has now been thrust into a position of leadership and rather than embracing the fundamentalist and tumultuous aspect of soul, he must rather embrace the calm, loving demeanor of his grandfather, Aaron, who chased after Justice and loved Amcha.  

Peace,

Rav Yitz

Wonder Who Will Water All The Children Of The Garden (Robert Hunter, Phil Lesh & Jerry Garcia - "St. Stephen")

It was an interesting week for fathers and sons and succession this week. It was interesting watching the relationship between the older generation and the younger generation. The week began with Donald Trump Jr. getting into a bit of hot water when seemed to try a bit too hard to help his father with the aid of a Russian Lawyer. While that story continue to be examined and its many layers peeled away there was another father/son moment that occurred early in the week as well. There is no baseball this week due to the All Star game that occurred on Tuesday night. However on Monday night Major League Baseball held its annual home run derby. Eight players were selected. One of players selected was a 21 year old phenom from the Los Angeles Dodgers, named Cody Bellinger. His father, Clay Bellinger, was a former baseball player with a fairly non-descript career primarily as a bench player. Yet on Monday night, there was dad throwing baseballs to his son as the son tried to hit the ball out of the park. In the a particularly touching moment, at the end of the first round, which Cody won; father and son met between the pitcher’s mound and home plate and hugged. When I was younger, as a boy, a teenager and even a young man; it is a hug that my father and my grandfather gave me. It is a hug that I have given my son.  The final father son moment of the week did not make the news, the political talk shows, ESPN or the sports section.  It is approximately five weeks before our son’s Bar Mitzvah. At this point, some say a month and some say two months, the Bar Mitzvah boy puts on his tefillin without making the corresponding blessing. This putting on the tefillin for the first time in front of his community is known as HaNachat Tefillin. So I drove down to camp, and we put on our tefillin together along with his camp community. I had been showing him prior to his leaving for camp, but now we put our tefillin together, sat together and davened together. When we finished, I hugged my son. Although he is nearing his 13^th birthday, the hug felt different than when he was younger. Perhaps he is just growing up.

This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few Psukim of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Parsha: Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Parsha Balak concludes with a plague upon Bnai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and are poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shelosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals etc).

             God also tells Moshe Rabeinu that his time as leader and in fact his life is quickly drawing to a close and that he should put his affairs in order (27:12-18). Given the opportunity this incredible opportunity to put his affairs in order, the most glaring concern that Moshe has is publicly naming and endorsing his successor. Yifkod Adoshem Elokai Haruchot L’Chol Basar Ish Al Ha’Eidah. May Hashem, God of the spirits of all flesh, appoint a man over the assembly, Asher Yeitzei Lifneihem va’Asher Yavo Lifneihem Va’Asher Yevieim V’Lo Tiheyeh Adat Adoshem Katzon Asher Ein Lahem Roeh –who shall go out before them and come in before them, who shall take them out and bring them in; and let the assembly of Hashem not be like sheep that have no shepherd. (27:16-17). Indeed God makes a choice. The question is: why didn’t Moshe just nominate Joshua using the language of the two Psukim and invoking the qualities enumerated in these two psukim?

 It seems that maybe Moshe was hoping for a different answer.  Bemidbar Rabbah, the Talmudic Sages commentary on the book of Bemidbar, makes the following comment: What prompted Moshe to make this request immediately after the chapter dealing with the laws of inheritance? Since the daughters of Tzelophchad inherited their father, Moshe said: Now is the time to make my claims. If daughters inherit, then it is only right that my sons inherit my glory! Said the Holy One Blessed Be He to him: ‘Who so keeps the fig tree shall eat the fruit thereof’ (Proverbs 27:18). Your sons idled away their time and did not occupy themselves with the study of the Torah, but as for Joshua, much did he minister to you and much honor did he apportion you… Since he served you with all his strength it were meet for him to minister to Israel that he doesn’t lose his reward. Take Joshua son of Nun” The Talmud adds: Why do not the children of scholars usually turn out to be scholars? Said Rabbi Yosef: That it should not be said that the Torah came to them by inheritance” (Nedarim 71a).  Rather, Torah is inherited by those who labor in it, who study it, who struggle with it and wrestle with it. A scholar’s son may engage in such activities but he does so because of his own volition, not because of his father.

             In this week of fathers and sons and in understanding Rabbi Yosef’s comment from Nedarim 71a; I realized something very important. In watching, Don Jr. I am not sure he has ever really struggled, I think he just inherited.  Clay Bellinger gave his son a gift, a love for baseball. However we all understand how hard his son, and any accomplished athlete for that matter, must work at his craft in order to be successful. Hours and hours and hours of practice and training are required. As I watch my son, put on his tefillin, take off his tefillin, wrap up his tefillin, I know that I am giving him tools to deal with the struggles of life. But hopefully, like the tefillin he will learn to master life’s struggles and wear his struggles with the same dignity and grace that he is learning to wear his tefillin. Perhaps the gift we give our sons and daughters is the desire or the capacity to put forth the effort in improving their respective lives and the world in which they live. 

Peace,

Rav Yitz

But I Say That The Women Today Are Smarter Than The Men In Every Way (Norman Span - " Man Smart, Women Smarter")

History was made this week. The proverbial glass ceiling was broken. For the first time in the history of the United States, a major political party formally nominated a woman for the President of the United States. While so many participants at the Democratic National Convention were praising themselves, while the press was taking a “pause” to recognize the historical significance, one talking head rightly pointed out just how behind the United States is. After all Angel Merkel has been the leader of Germany for many years already. Great Britain was led by Margaret Thatcher in the 1980’s. Indira Gandhi led India  in the first half of the 1980’s, Benazir Bhutto was the Prime Minister of Pakistan in the late 1980’s and then in a second term in the mid 1990’s. And before all of those women were elected to office, Gold Meir a diminutive Jewish woman from Milwaukee Wisconsin (via Kiev), became Prime Minister of Israel in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. Yes Golda Meir broke the glass ceiling nearly 50 years ago. However Jewish law began breaking glass ceilings long before Golda Meir.

                This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few psukim (verses) of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and are poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shelosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals etc).

The narrative concerning the Daughters of Tzelophchad is really the first instance in the Torah of a glass ceiling breaking. No, it may not be as dramatic as becoming the first Prime Minister or President, however the seeds for ground breaking change at the highest level, owe, in small part to small very subtle shifts in social norms. This narrative illustrates the point. B’nai Yisroel is about to enter Eretz Canaan. Each tribe is to receive an area. Each family within each tribe is to receive tribal land. Until that moment, in that part of the world, and at that time, inheritance was through the man. A son inherited his father. If there was no son, then inheritance would revert to the living brother (if one existed). Or land would be inherited by the son- in law, or held in trust, until the daughter of the deceased married. The idea that a daughter could inherit was unheard of, and unthinkable. How do we know this? The daughters present their case to Moshe and he doesn’t know how to decide. So he asks God: Avinu Meit BaMidbar V’Hu Lo Hayah B’Toch Ha’Eidah HaNoadim Al Adoshem B’Adat Korach Ki v’Cheto Meit U’Vanim Lo Hayu Lo – Our father died in the Wilderness, but he was not among the assembly that was gathering against Hashem in the assembly of Korach, but he died of his own sin; and he had no son. Lamah Yigra Shem Avinu MiToch Mishpachto Ki Ein Lo Bein T’nah Lanu Achuzah B’Toch Achei Avinu – Why should the name of our father be omitted from among his family because he had no son? Give us a possession among our father’s brothers. Quite cleverly, the daughters explain that their father did not participate in any rebellion against Moshe’s nor God’s authority. Rather he committed and individual sin that led to his death. However that should not preclude him nor his family from receiving land. Clearly this was entirely new and Moshe had never no idea how to solve this precedent setting legal issue. VaYakreiv Moshe et Mishpatan Lifnei Hashem – So Moshe brought their claim to Hashem. However a hint as to decision exist in the word MishpataN (their claim). The last letter of the word is written in a bold font compared to the rest of the Torah letters. This special letter designating the daughters tells us that the daughters were meritorious and worthy of making the claim. They did so in a respectful manner mindful of the law and willing to work within the system.  The rest of the narrative substantiates the final letter’s special font in MishpataN as God instructs Moshe that indeed, the daughters inherit and this precedent will become law just like the laws that Moshe presents to B’nai Yisroel at the Parsha’s conclusion.

Yes, we take it for granted that woman can own land. However it didn’t always use to be like that. First Lady Michelle Obama pointed out in her speech to the Democratic National Convention, that young millennial woman (including my three daughters) take for granted that a woman can aspire to anything including President of the United States. But for those who came first, for those who set the precedent, it wasn’t something to be taken for granted. It wasn’t considered normal.  As God says to Moshe- Kein B’not Tzelophchad Dovrot – The daughters of Tzlophchad speak properly. The daughters had merit, they wanted the same responsibilities and land oriented obligations as everyone else who had received land.  They did not want any special favors; just an equal opportunity. Yes, sometimes the glass ceilings breaks as a result of one big rock. Sometimes it breaks as a result of thousands of small stones thrown at the ceiling over the course of time, chipping away here and there, making a tiny crack here and there, until finally it shatters.

Peace

Rav Yitz