It was a particularly odd week. On one hand, we prepared for and celebrated Purim. We organized Mishloach Manot, my wife baked Hamentashen, we went to a Seudah and we celebrated “the Jews victory over Haman”. On the other hand, we watched as Ukrainians continue to defend themselves against Putin’s army. We watch the Russian army fire rockets indiscriminately into civilian areas. We watch refugees flee, and we see images reminiscent of Europe circa 1938-1939. We listened to President Zelenskyy speak to Canada’s Parliament and the United States Congress. We couldn’t help but be aware of the dichotomy between the Joy of Purim and the horror that continues to unfold in Ukraine. Indeed our Talmudic Sages that there is Haman in every generation and there is Amalek in every generation. As we watch the events in Ukraine unfold and resistance to Putin stiffen in Ukraine and grow in Russia, it appears that this Amalek might not be as powerful as he thought. Yes, he is still dangerous but not as powerful. This makes for fascinating negotiations.
This week we read from Parsha Tzav. In it, we learn that the Kohanim are responsible for their own offerings as well as making offerings on behalf of the people. God instructs Moshe to teach the Kohanim their responsibilities in slaughtering the offerings, cleaning up, what must be burnt, and what the Kohen may consume. After God completes the set of instructions specifically for the Kohanim, God then instructs Moshe as to B’nai Yisroel’s responsibilities as well. Finally, God instructs Moshe to make the required preparations for the Kohen to assume his position among the people. This includes the bringing of sin offerings, achieving a certain spiritual mindset as well as learning how to make all the offerings.
As the instructions are issued concerning each offering, there is a general pattern. V’Zot Torat [name of offering] Hakreiv –And this is the law of the meal-offering (the peace offering, the feast offering, etc.) However, the Sin Offering breaks with the Parsha’s formula. Zot Torat Ha’Chatat Bimkom Asher Tishacheit Ha’Olah Tishacheit HaChatat Lifnei Kodesh Kodashim Hu – This is the law of the sin offering; in the place where the elevation offering is slaughtered shall the sin offering be slaughtered, before God, it is most Holy (Lev. 6:18). Why is this the only offering that designates a specific place that is exactly the same as another offering? If this offering to God is so important why wouldn’t the offering take place separately in its own time and in its own location? Precisely because it is so important, and this offering requires such sensitivity, we are extremely concerned. One makes the Sin Offering after an unintentional sin is committed. If someone points out a mistake that we make, our first response might be defensive, to make excuses. This is normal if we experience shame and embarrassment. However when we are not embarrassed, when we are not humiliated then it is much easier to admit to the sin, or the mistake and apologize in a humble manner. If the Sin Offering occurred in its own location, then everyone else would know that those people had sinned and were now making an offering as a form of apology. People would talk and the individual bringing the offering would perhaps be too embarrassed to work on his/her relationship with God. This is tragic. So in order to preserve the individual’s dignity, the Torah provides anonymity. Someone looking on would never know if the individual making the offering is there with a sin offering or an elevation offering. Torah creates an environment to allow the individual to be forthright, honest, and still save face within the community.
No, Putin’s “sin offering” cannot be made anonymously. The negotiations will be public. Any “loss of face” will be public or at least public to the rest of the world. He will always be able to “save face” in Russia since he controls so much of the Russian press. Nevertheless, the world will have a very difficult time in trying to find a peaceful solution unless Putin concludes that the cost to re-create a “Greater Russia” reminiscent of Peter the Great is personally to financially, emotionally, and politically too expensive. Hopefully, those costs will be worth more than his “saving face”. Maybe then, there can be a serious discussion about peace.
Rav Yitz
No comments:
Post a Comment