And There's Nothing Left To Do But Count The Years (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "Black Muddy River")

            There is a concept in Judaism called Cheshbon HaNefesh, an accounting of the soul. Cheshbon HaNefesh tantamount to analyzing a balance sheet examines the soul's assets and liabilities its virtues and shortcomings. Cheshbon HaNefesh forces the individual to engage in analysis of “where they are in their lives”. How far astray have they wandered from the most sacred and holy aspects of themselves? How far astray have they wandered from the best version of themselves? It is not a process that leads to a request for forgiveness although it is a process that may lead to an apology. It is not a process that leads to a request for mercy; although it is a process that may inform and direct others to avoid the mistakes that the individual made. It is not a process that generally occurs in public; rather it is a deeply personal and spiritual endeavor. After watching the events of the past week unfold in Ukraine, and seeing how unified Europe, Canada, and the United States are against Putin; I wonder if a country and a society’s collective historical memory motivates a nation and a society to engage in a type of Cheshbon HaNefest. Does a country or a  society ask itself: “How far have we drifted from the ideals of our nation?”  “Can we, as citizens, find a better path?”   

        This week's Parsha is Pekudei. It is the last Parsha of Sefer Shmot. The Parsha, in a very matter-of-fact way, provides us with an accounting of all the material that was used for the Mishkan. The Parsha, in a very matter-of-fact way, tell us all that Bezalel and Oholiab had done while inspired by God and their art. We derive this idea of "taking stock" from the first Pasuk. Eilah F'kudei Ha'Mishkan Ha'Eidut Asher Pukad Al Pi Moshe Avodat Ha'Leviim - These are the countings of the Tabernacle, the Tabernacle of Testimony, which was reckoned at Moshe's bidding (Ex.38:21). What follows is essentially a ledger of all materials that were used in the Mishkan's construction.  With full transparency, Moshe engages in a full accounting of the materials used by Bezalel, Oholiab, and supplied by B'nai Yisroel in order to eliminate any possibility of corruption and instead, to prove that these materials were used to construct the Mishkan. Why do we need this accounting? We have been reading about the Mishkan for the last four Parshiot. However, it was not until now, that Moshe and B'nai Yisroel were able to look back at the process and see exactly how far along they have come. For a lengthy period of time, B'nai Yisroel, as told to us in the Torah, had experienced an individual, communal and spiritual revolution. They watched Ten Plagues destroy Egypt, fled Egypt, and experienced the miracle of the Crossing of the Yam Suf. They witnessed the revelation at Sinai, received the Ten Commandments, panicked, and built the Golden Calf. They began the T'shuvah process by bringing a half Shekel as a means of expressing atonement. They willingly brought their precious jewels and raw materials for the construction of the Mishkan. They came together as a community and they successfully constructed "God's dwelling place."

            Certainly, there were specific events that we would deem as vitally important, including the actual exodus from Egypt, the Crossing of the Reed Sea, and the Revelation at Sinai. However, in each of these three pivotal moments, B'nai Yisroel behaved as individuals. During each of these three pivotal moments, one could argue that B'nai Yisroel was more reactive than proactive. After the Tenth Plague, following God's direct command, B'nai Yisroel left Egypt. After God opened the Reed Sea, B'nai Yisroel began to cross it. It is the Midrash that explains that B'nai Yisroel took the first steps into the water prior to God's miracle. The revelation at Sinai was a more reactive experience than a pro-active one. Even the Golden Calf fiasco could be argued as B'nai Yisroel's response to the fact that Moshe delayed his descent from the mountain. However, Tshuvah (Repentance)  helps explain why in last week's Parsha (VaYakheil), B'nai Yisroel brought so much more material and so many participated. Regarding the construction of the Mishkan,  it wasn't built out of fear and anxiety as was the Golden Calf. Instead, the construction of the Mishkan demonstrated a genuine desire, a choice to have God dwell among the community.  Constructing and completing the Mishkan, for this generation was perhaps its greatest achievement. They were finally, at least for the time being, pure of soul and pure of heart. They understood what it meant to be a community, a holy community, and the Mishkan was an expression of that. Therefore when B'nai Yisroel completed this transition to “people-hood” culminating in the completion of the Mishkan; it makes sense that an accounting of the Mishkan's construction would occur.

            From Moshe's "accounting", we learn something very important about human nature. As individuals, as part of a team, and as part of the community; we need to do Cheshbon HaNefesh, an accounting of our souls. While it is certainly important to do Cheshbon HaNefesh at prescribed times with the community (Yom Kippur for example); it is also vital that we engage in this process when we have survived and successfully or unsuccessfully navigated through the transition.  These transitions and changes are not necessarily confined to lifecycle events or the calendar but as a part of life in general; and certainly when about to begin a new and difficult phase of life. Parsha Pekudei reminds us that we must possess the self-awareness to step back and look back at the process and own it, and if it is appropriate, mourn it, celebrate it, or learn from it. Perhaps society and a country’s collective historical memory can also engage in Cheshbon HaNefesh. Countries that were neutral 80 years ago when another European dictator invaded other countries are no longer neutral. Where once the Western World took years to debate, placate, dither, and finally called out a dictator; this time it took the world less than a few weeks to come together, to begin supplying Ukraine and announce and enforce economic sanctions against a corrupt brutal dictator. Maybe the thousands of Russians who have had the courage to protest and speak out against its corrupt brutal dictator illustrates the first steps of national accounting.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

History's Page Will Be Neatly Carved In Stone ( John Barlow & Bob Weir- "Throwing Stones")

It’s not every week where we get to watch history made and unmade. For all the soccer (football) fans, history was made when France won the world cup led by a teenager. That hasn’t happened since the legendary Pele led his team to a World Cup victory while he was a teenager. History was also unmade as the President did his level best to undo a seventy-year relationship with Europe, explicitly commenting historical allies including Canada, Germany, England and NATO, the EU, should be considered foes. History was also unmade as the President did his level best to befriend a government, a type of leadership, and a country that, in the aftermath of WWII, gave the world an Iron Curtain, attempted to give nuclear missiles to Cuba, brought legitimacy to North Korea, Chairman Mao’s China, Assad’s Syria, as well as a rise in cyber warfare in places that have democratic elections. As remarkable uplifting as it was to watch history made; it was equally disconcerting and deflating watching history being unmade. I was raised to believe that History could be considered something sacred, something holy. It is something to be learned. It is something that connects the present to the past. It allows us to chart a path to a better future. So I was absolutely aghast when I saw a leader behave in a manner that was completely bereft of a sense of history, and acknowledgment of belonging to a rich tradition, of belonging to an organization that predecessors helped to create. Perhaps even more troubling is that without a sense of history, a person could legitimately believe that until showing up, nothing preceded his/her arrival, and nothing of value will probably follow. That attitude is completely at odds with a person who reveres history and that attitude is completely at odds with Torah, Judaism and Moshe Rabbeinu.

This week’s Parsha is Devarim, which is the first Parsha of the Book of Deuteronomy or Sefer Devarim. Moshe recounts in very wide brushstrokes, the experience of the generation that fled Egypt. Very few details are given. In fact Moshe begins the story at the foot of Sinai; however, the name is changed from Sinai to Horev. In his recounting, Moshe speaks as a participant in this national experience not in the third person, as was presented in the Books of Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers. This is quite different from the Moshe we have seen. Until now he spoke as a prophet. God spoke to him and he spoke to B'nai Yisroel. Now Moshe displays a certain amount of freedom as he shares past experience from his perspective. Parsha Devarim is the introductory Parsha to Moshe’s formal teaching of the Torah to this new generation. Moshe begins with a history lesson beginning with the most recent events and working backward to the Exodus. Moshe Rabeinu, now only a few weeks from the moment of his death, imparts his teaching and his wisdom upon B’nai Yisroel like a dying grandparent or parent would to his/her children.  This re-telling or repetition of history and laws to a new generation inspired the Talmudic Sages to call Sefer Devarim (The Book of Words- Deuteronomy) the Mishnah Torah or the repetition of the Torah.

Both the Parsha and the Book of Devarim begin with a narrative statement.  Eilah HaDevarim Asher Diber Moshe El B’nai Yisroel B’Eiver Yarden-These is the words that Moshe Spoke to all Israel, on the other side of the Jordan…(Deut. 1:1) For the next 5 verses, the Torah’s text is in the third person narrative form in which a time and place are clarified. Finally, beginning with verse 6, the third person narrative shifts to Moshe’s words.  What follows in Moshe's teaching and Moshe’s repetition of the Torah embodies tradition. Moshe’s teaching and his repetition of the Torah, exemplifies every parent’s responsibility to strengthen the child’s connection to Judaism, to Torah, and to God. Why do we need to be told that for five verses, Moses’ words will be arriving shortly? Since there are no wasted words in the Torah, why don’t the words Eilah Devarim appear immediately before Moshe begins speaking? The Or HaChaim, Chaim Ibn Attar (1696-1743), was a leading Moroccan Rabbinic Commentator of his day, explained that the word Eilah implies “only” and is therefore restrictive and separates that which came before from that which follows. The words that came before this are God’s the words that follow this Eilah are Moshe’s and are of his own volition.  Citing the Talmud in Tractate Megillah 31, we are reminded that Moshe personally recorded the curses and admonitions in this book and even the legislation which he repeats he does so voluntarily; not because he was commanded to do so.  The first five narrative verses clarify time and space as Moshe’s words are about to follow because we might conclude that just as Moshe felt free to say what he wants here in Devarim, he might have felt free to say what he wanted in the previous books of the Torah. “Only these words” that Moshe spoke of his own volition.

The Book of Devarim will remind us that Moshe Rabeinu was an incredibly humble man. There was none more humble. Here was Moshe Rabbeinu, the elder statesman, the individual that unquestionably had the closes relationship with God, a leader of a people for more than forty years. He had every reason to believe that there was no narrative before he came upon the scene. He has every reason to not care what happens after he is gone since he is prohibited from entering into the land. However by taking on the role of the transmitter, Eilah HaDevarim Asher Dibeir Moshe – “These are the words that Moshe spoke” and was astute enough to write down, Moshe understood his place in History. He understood what it meant to make history, and to do so, inspire people to continue transmitting his message, his words long after he was gone. After watching certain leaders unmake history, fail to understand his place in history; I realize that those leaders don’t have words that inspire a message worth transmitting to future generations.

Peace,

Rav Yitz