The Radical He Rant And Rage; Singing Someone's Got To Turn The Page (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Throwin' Stones"

          What is the difference between a Believer and a Zealot?  Perhaps it depends on who is looking. When describing one’s self and dedication to a movement, one usually sees him/herself and fellow members of that group as Believers. Zealots are the extremists on the other side. Certainly, both Believers and Zealots believe in the “goodness”, the “holiness” or the “correctness” of their belief system. Maybe the difference between a Believer and a Zealot is the treatment of the “Other”.   Perhaps the most difficult task of any belief system is to acknowledge zealotry within one’s belief system. However, the sustainability of every belief system, whether it be social, religious, or political is the ability of that belief system to recognize that perhaps the belief system itself creates an environment for zealotry, eliminate that environment, and then isolate the zealots until there is a realization that zealotry ultimately fails. History has witnessed the eventual irrelevance of numerous belief systems that have gone the way of the Zealot eventually turning on themselves: The Montagnards during the Reign of Terror, Mao's Cultural Revolution. There were religious zealots that contributed to the religious wars between Catholics and Protestants and Sunnis and Shia. There are zealots who have killed and threatened abortion providers. Interestingly enough, there are no cases of zealots who harm those who hold anti-abortion or anti-choice positions.  

          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. Pinchas came to our attention last week when at the conclusion of Parsha Balak, he threw a spear at Zimri the son of the head of the Tribe of Shimon (one of the Twelve Tribes), and Cozbi, a Midianite princess, while they were co-habiting. At the time, there was a plague that was wiping out B’nai Yisroel because of their relationship with the Midianite women and worshipping the Midianite/Moabite God Baal Peor. Pinchas put an end to it by killing Zimri and Cozbi. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. God commands a new census be taken. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad, and they make the case that they should inherit their father’s tribal lands. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc). Then God also tells Moshe Rabeinu that his time as leader and in fact his life is quickly drawing to a close and that he should put his affairs in order and name a new leader (27:12-18). Joshua becomes the designated future leader.

          It appears that God offered a reward to Pinchas.  Pinchas Ben Elazar Ben Aharon HaKohen Heishiv et Chamati Mei’Al B’nai Yisroel B’Kano et Kinati B’TOcham V'Lo ChiLiTi et B’nai Yisroel B’Kinati – Pinchas son of Elazar son of Aharon the Kohen, tuned back My wrath from upon the Children of Israel when he zealously avenged My vengeance, among them, so I did not consume the Children of Israel in my vengeance. Lachen Emor Hinneni Notein Lo et Briti Shalom – Therefore, say: Behold! I give him My covenant of peace. V’Haitaha Lo U’LeZaro Acharav Brit Kehunat Olam Tachat Asher Kinei Leilohav VaYiChaPeR Al B’Nai Yisroel – And it shall be for him and his offspring after him a covenant of eternal priesthood because he took vengeance for his God, and he atoned for the Children of Israel. (Num. 25:11-13) Certainly, on a superficial level, it appears that because of Pinchas’ zealous defending of God and God’s Torah, he receives something, a Brit Shalom. The sages in the Jerusalem Talmud state that Pinchas's act of vigilante justice did not meet the approval of Moshe or the elders. In fact, they wanted to excommunicate him until then God stepped in and said that the line of Pinchas would be the line of the Kohen Gadol. Here is a belief system recognizing the dangers of the Zealot and suggesting that the only way to deal with the Zealot is ex-communication. So how do we make sense of God’s apparent reward for Pinchas’ zealous behavior? The  NeTziV (Rabbi Naphtali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin 19th Century Poland and Rosh Yeshiva of the Volozhin Yeshiva) offers a fascinating insight and explanation. The Brit Shalom The Covenant of Peace, was not given to protect Pinchas from those wishing to avenge Zimri’s murder, nor was it a reward for the purity of heart that some sages explained was necessary to ‘defend Hashem’.  Keeping in mind that the plague ceased, and lives were saved, The NeTziV comments “In reward for turning away the wrath of the HaKadosh Baruch Hu [God], He blessed Pinchas with the attribute of peace, that he should not be quick-tempered or angry anymore. Since it was only natural that such a deed as Pinchas’ should leave in his heart intense emotional unrest afterward, the Divine blessing was designed to cope with this situation and promised peace and tranquility of soul.” By becoming the eventual Kohen Gadol, Pinchas would have to pursue peace and compromise like his grandfather Aharon. In order to pursue peace like his grandfather, Pinchas will have to see both sides and neither side can be viewed as “other”. Pinchas will now have to learn patience, and understanding in order to recognize the intricacies of the law and sacrificial offerings. Perhaps most important, Pinchas will have to recognize his own fallibility and work on himself instead of harming others. 

          So Pinchas wasn’t rewarded per se. Instead, he would be a reminder that Judaism abhors zealotry and vigilanteism.  There is no place for it.  Before he does, Moshe will implore this new generation preparing to enter into Canaan, that God’s path is neither to the right nor to the left but rather the middle path (Deut. 5:29-30). Judaism doesn’t reward Zealots. Instead, Judaism recognizes that zealousness is a sickness. It is a spiritual sickness or perversion of belief. As a result, the soul within requires healing, the soul needs Shalom - Peace.

Peace,
Rav Yitz 

Red And White, Blue Suede Shoes; I’m Uncle Sam, How Do You Do (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia -" U.S. Blues")

           This week, Canada celebrated its national birthday and early next week, the United States will celebrate its national birthday. Both countries are the embodiment of the “New World'', a world based upon laws, democracy, and a dream that the future is genuinely brighter and more hopeful than the past. Both countries offer possibility, opportunity and aspire to create a society where one ought to be judged by the “content of character”, not by skin color, country of origin, wealth, or family connections. Both countries have always made it clear that no person is above the law: Not the poorest, not the wealthiest, not the meekest, not the most powerful.  So as my children celebrate both Canada Day and Independence Day; I feel compelled to remind them that what they should keep in mind when they celebrate is that more than any form of government more than any form of a society’s basic principle of social organization; Democracy is the holiest form of government and, besides Torah, Democracy is one of the holiest organizing principles of a society. Like Torah, in Democracy the Law is sacred, the law is Holy, and no king, no leader is above the law. Like Torah, Democracy and Law work best when it avoids fundamentalism/extremism of the left and right; but rather sticks to the middle (Deut. 28:14).

          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few Psukim of the Parsha is a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of the Moabite /Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded its 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and is poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc).

          In between the narrative of the Daughters of Tzlophchad and educating the new generation about all time-bound offerings that correspond to Shabbat, Festivals and Rosh Chodesh, Moshe makes a request of God. Acknowledging that he cannot go on forever, Moshe asks God for a successor.  Yifkod Hashem Elohei HaRuchot L’Chol Basar Eish Al Ha’Eidah, Asher Yeitzeh Lifneihem Va’Asher Yavo Lifneihem Va’Asher Yotzieim Va’Asher Y’Vieim V’Lo Tiheyeh Adat HaShem KaTzon Asher Ein LaHem Roeh - May Hashem, God of the spirits of all flesh appoint a man over the assembly, who shall go out before them and come in before them, who shall take them out and bring them in; and let the assembly of Hashem not be like sheep that have no shepherd (Num. 27:16-17). In these two verses, we learn about Moshe’s attitudes concerning the necessary qualities for leadership. A leader “ goes out before the people”, and not lead from behind. Like the shepherd, he looks after all the people including the most vulnerable members of the flock. Moshe does not foist his sons upon the people nor upon God as possible successors to Moshe. Even the way Moshe addresses God in this brief narrative suggests something less particularistic, less elitist, more “democratic” and more focused upon the content of character. Moshe refers to God as “the God of the spirits and all flesh”. Rashi explains that “God of spirits and all flesh” refers to God’s knowledge of the intricacies of the human mind, the complexities of human personality and that each individual’s character permits that person to succeed or fail in certain situations. God’s response to Moshe is simple and straightforward. God points to Joshua Asher Ruach Bo- because in him there is spirit (Num 27:18). Joshua has the necessary and appropriate character needed to lead B’nai Yisroel on the next phase of its national journey. Joshua is not from Moshe’s tribe, he is not Moshe’s son nor nephew. Joshua was evaluated solely upon the content of his character. He has Ruach Bo- the spirit within him. He possesses the right character for the job.

         No, there was no election to name Moshe’s successor, nor did the people choose. Despite that, God and Moshe taught this new generation, and every generation after, an important lesson about society. Certainly there social and religious institutions that were based upon the tribe, and upon birth. The Mishkan would be operated and maintained by the Leviim. Only descendants of Aaron, Elazar, and then Pinchas, could serve as the Kohen Gadol. Apart from the Temple and the institution of animal sacrifices,  leadership was based upon the content of character. Today, we understand that knowledge and the content of character are perhaps the most important qualities in our elected officials,  and our community leaders, especially in communities that aspire to the highest of democratic ideals. As parents, we teach our children to evaluate leaders based upon their knowledge and the content of their character, We hope that as our children make their way in the world, that they will also be judged for their knowledge and the content of their character. After all, judging one by the content of one’s character is as old as Joshua being named Moshe’s successors and as new as the noble experiments of democracy here in the “New World”.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

Can't You See That You're Killing Each Other's Soul (Jerry Garcia - Great Cream Puff War)

Earlier in the week, I went to the hospital to do Vidui, the final confession for an elderly man whose death seemed imminent. When I arrived, his family was there including children and grandchildren. After I did the Vidui, the children and the grandchildren needed to talk. They asked me about a funeral, whom to call, and what to do. The daughter in law, holding her youngest child on her lap asked me whether or not I thought it was appropriate to bring children to the funeral and to the cemetery. Unequivocally, I said that it was absolutely appropriate to bring the children and it is important for them to be with their family during this difficult time. I explained that children need to learn how to make sense of certain life cycle events. It should not be left up to their imagination, nor should they be alone. They should be with their family, free to ask questions and express their feelings. Also, they need to learn how to deal with this kind of loss since it is something they will contend with throughout their respective lives, and being with their parents and family for the first time is the safest way to learn how to deal with this type of loss.  I explained to this young mother, that the most important gift she and her husband can provide for their children is the emotional strength to handle loss and not be afraid.  The emotions of loss: grief, sadness, sorrow, despair are part of the process of dealing with these life cycle issues in a matter of fact type of way. I asked the young mother if she wanted her children to grow up being whole and complete people. She responded that she did. I explained that to be whole and complete means that her children do not grow up being paralyzed by life and death, nor becoming so emotionally distraught that they don’t know how to live life after experiencing such a severe loss. I suggested that might be the biggest gift parents can give their children, the tools to find Peace, a Brit Shalom, Covenant of Peace.

This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few Psukim of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon Bnai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and are poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shelosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc).

Isn't it odd, or perhaps even disturbing, that Pinchas' zealousness, his subsequent spear throwing and impaling his targets is rewarded with a Brit Shalom - a Covenant of Peace and Brit Kehunat Olam - a covenant of an everlasting Priesthood? (Num. 25:12). Through our modernist lens, I imagine that most people consider or at least can understand why some may consider Pinchas act to be nothing more than fanaticism or vigilantism. The Neziv (Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Berlin Poland 1817-1893; the Rosh Yeshiva of the Volozhin Yeshiva) assumes that intrinsic to an act of vigilantism or fanaticism is a person whose soul and entire being is in turmoil and not in a state of peace.  The Neziv explains that the Brit Shalom is a guarantee of peace from an inner enemy, from whatever lurked within Pinchas that caused him to kill another human being without due process. "The Holy One, Blessed He, blessed him [Pinchas] with the attribute of peace, that he should not be quick-tempered or angry. Since it was only natural that such a deed as Pinchas' should leave in his heart intense emotional unrest afterward, the Divine blessing was designed to cope with this situation and promised peace and tranquility of the soul." We can now begin to make some sense of Brit Shalom, Covenant of Peace. Once Pinchas committed his first act of zealous defense of God's glory, perhaps it becomes easier and easier to commit a second, third or forty-eighth act in the name of God's glory. At some point, from the Neziv's perspective, the zealot's soul becomes damaged, the zealot's emotions are incapable of feelings, and the zealot's eyes become unseeing except through the lens of their zealousness, ideology, and the slavish adherence to defending its purity. The zealot, by definition, is an extremist. Jewish Law frowns upon extremism (see the laws of the Nazarite).  Precisely because the zealot does not know peace when he/she commits such an act, the only “gift” God could give Pinchas was that the tumult and turmoil within Pinchas’  soul should cease and his soul should become Shaleim whole, complete and at peace.

From this perspective, that Brit Shalom was not so much a reward of external gain as it was a reward for internal “normalcy”, the Brit Shalom and the Brit Kehunat L’Olam seem much more appropriate. Isn’t that what we wish for our children? We know that during the course of their lives there will be moments of tumult. We know that they will experience tension between their belief system and the realities of daily life. We know that they will be exposed to extreme emotions of joy, of sadness, of anguish and of anger. Pinchas received a Brit Shalom in order to manage the tumult within his soul. When parents and grandparents see their children and grandchildren's soul in spiritual and emotional tumult;  certainly they wish for nothing but Peace for their suffering children and grandchildren. Indeed, when children and grandchildren experience extreme and intense emotions that are an inevitable part of life; we pray that they will be able to return to a state of peace and contentment with themselves and their lives.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

Who'll Go Right Through The Book And Break Each And Every Law (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "I Need A Miracle")

This week, Canada celebrated Canada Day (formerly known as Dominion Day) and the United State celebrated Independence Day. Both countries are the embodiment of the “New World”, a world built upon laws, democracy and based upon a dream that the future is genuinely brighter and more hopeful than the “Old World’s” paralyzing history and restrictive social mores. Both countries offer a possibility, an opportunity and that one ought to be judged by the “content of character”, not by skin colour, country of origin, wealth, or family connections. Both countries have always made it clear that no person is above the law: Not the poorest, not the wealthiest, not the meekest, not the most powerful.  So as my children celebrate both Canada Day and Independence Day; I feel compelled to remind them that what they should keep in mind when they celebrate is that more than any form of government more than any form of a society’s basic principle of organization; Democracy is the holiest form of government and, besides Torah, Democracy is one of the holiest organizing principles of a society. Like Torah, in Democracy the Law is sacred, the law is Holy, and no king no leader is above the Law. Like Torah, Democracy and Law work best when it avoids fundamentalism/extremism of the left and right; but rather sticks to the middle (Deut. 28:14).

This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few Psukim of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha: Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behaviour by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and are poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals etc).

Isn't it odd, or perhaps even disturbing, that Pinchas' zealousness, his subsequent spear throwing and impaling his targets appears rewarded with a Brit Shalom - a Covenant of Peace and Brit Kehunat Olam - a covenant of an everlasting Priesthood? (Num. 25:12). Through our modernist lens, many readers will perceive Pinchas’ act to be nothing more than fanaticism or vigilantism. It appears as if vigilantism is rewarded. To offer Pinchas Peace and the Priesthood becomes seems incomprehensible. The NeZiV (Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Berlin Poland 1817-1893; the Rosh Yeshiva of the Volozhin Yeshiva) offers a fascinating explanation that might be valuable in today's’ age of extremists recruiting young people. The NeZiV explains that the Brit Shalom is a guarantee of peace from an inner enemy from whatever lurked within Pinchas that caused him to kill another human being without due process. "The Holy One Blessed He blessed him [Pinchas] with the attribute of peace, that he should not be quick-tempered or angry. Since it was only natural that such a deed as Pinchas' should leave in his heart an intense emotional unrest afterward, the Divine blessing was designed to cope with this situation and promised peace and tranquility of the soul." We can now begin to make some sense of these covenants. Once Pinchas committed his first act of zealous defence of God's glory, perhaps it becomes easier and easier to commit the second, third or forty-eighth act of zealous defence of God's glory. At some point, from the NeZiV's perspective, the zealot's soul becomes damaged, the zealot's emotions are incapable of feelings, and the zealot's eyes become unseeing except through the lens of their zealousness. The zealot by definition is an extremist and we know that extremism in Judaism is frowned upon and halachically unacceptable (see the laws of the Nazarite).  Precisely because the zealot does not know peace when he/she commits such an act, in Pinchas' case the only gift God could give was that the tumult of his own soul should cease and he should be whole, complete and at peace.

Yes, Pinchas saved a community from further pain and suffering by hurling that spear at Zimri and Omri. Yes, Pinchas murdered that Prince of the tribe of Shimon and that Princess Midian. The Covenant isn’t so much a reward but rather it is a salve or a balm for the tumult within Pinchas’ soul. Now, Pinchas and his descendants could ill afford to ever act as vigilantes, Pinchas and his descendants could ill afford to take on a such a fundamentalist attitude because Pinchas has now been thrust into a position of leadership and rather than embracing the fundamentalist and tumultuous aspect of soul, he must rather embrace the calm, loving demeanor of his grandfather, Aaron, who chased after Justice and loved Amcha.  

Peace,

Rav Yitz