One Way Or Another This Darkness Got To Give (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "New Speedway Boogie"

          Our high school age children resumed school following a two week winter vacation.  During the vacation, they had to complete an assigned book. Our daughter read The Book of Negros, otherwise known as Someone Knows My Name in the United States. Like a good father, I asked my daughter about the book, the main character’s journey and how massive historical events and themes affected her life such as the institution of slavery, the American Revolution, the British retreat to Newfoundland and the migration of numerous black servants and “freed men” to Newfoundland as well as the British Empire’s policy of abolishing slavery from the empire. Needless to say, it was a fascinating discussion and gave her lots of material for the essay she must now begin. Our son read George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Like a good father, I asked my son about the book and the main animal characters in particular I ask him about the character named Napoleon as he is the character that assumes autocratic/dictatorial power of the farm under the guise of helping all the animals. Specifically, I asked him about the process by which he was able to take over a movement that originally was designed to empower all the animals and consolidate that power and control for himself. My son explained that Napoleon played on the fear that the animals  of humans and that he, Napoleon, was the only one who could protect them. Also, he used propaganda, disinformation, and constantly lied so that the truth was always hidden from the animals. By keeping the animals in the dark, by preventing the flow of information and diluting the truth; there was no sense of truth. As a result, the animals never achieved the freedom that they thought they would attain when they rid themselves of Farmer Jones.

          This week's Parsha is Bo.  The ten plagues culminate with locusts, darkness and finally the killing of the first born. On the night of the last plague, God instructs Moshe to tell B'nai Yisroel to slaughter a lamb for each family. The blood should be painted onto the door- post. The sacrificed lamb must be completely eaten that night with no leftovers.  The command continues with God instructing Moshe to reiterate this story to the children of each family. The Parsha concludes with the command to sanctify the first born, remember this night, remember what God did for B'nai Yisroel, and how B'nai Yisroel eventually returned to the land. 

          The second to last plague is Choshech, darkness. Vayomer Adonai El Moshe N'Teih Yadchah Al Hashamayim - And God said to Moshe "Stretch forth your hand toward the heavens , Va'Yehi Choshech Al Eretz Mitzrayim - "And there will be a darkness upon the land of Egypt , Vayameish Choshech - and the darkness will depart. (Ex. 10:21). What does it mean that the darkness will depart? If darkness departs doesn’t that mean light arrives? Typical darkness is merely the absence of light. According to Sforno, the great Italian Renaissance commentator, typical darkness is atmosphere prepared to receive light. After all the moon reflects light into the night, and the stars shine a light as well. Sforno explains that the word VaYameish comes from three letter root M-Oo-Sh : Mem Vav Shin which to feel or touch. The plague of darkness conjures up the image of a person trying to feel their way in the darkness, lost and unable to see immediately in front as if they have their hands outstretched and feeling their way around.  This plague is perhaps the most perfectly designed plague in that it can only affect the Egyptian because they were free. This type of darkness could not affect the Hebrew slaves. Prior to the darkness, the free Egyptians could come and go as they pleased, they were not confined, they had freedom of movement. Obviously slaves do not enjoy freedom of movement. Rather, like a prisoner, the slaves were captive and bound by very physical limits. However with the kind of darkness that leaves one groping and feeling one’s way; the slave will eventually feel his/her way to the boundaries  and be able to very quickly be able to figure out the shape and dimensions of that confined space.

          It is no surprise therefore, that B'nai Yisroel still had light in their dwellings. Why?  The descendants of Jacob the Patriarch, are the beneficiaries of a covenant that God made with Jacob, and a means to avoid groping around in the darkness trying to find their way. They saw the limits, in another words, the slaves saw boundaries in Mitzvot (commandments) and law. They saw the boundaries of time as in the commandment of the New Moon. They saw boundaries in terms of space. Within the confines of their home, they were to eat the Passover sacrifice, answer their children’s questions, and tell them the story of the Passover. B’nai Yisroel would never have darkness because asking questions, and the process by which time is controlled (declaring a New Moon) requires information, truth and the recognition that everyone must adhere to law. My son explained that dictators and autocrats prefer darkness; that way information, and truth is hidden, and laws and the legal process can be turned upside down. He thanked me for the discussion and said he thinks he has enough material to apply the lessons in Animal Farm to current autocrats, dictators and those who wish to emulated autocrats and dictators. Sounds like an interesting essay. 

Peace,

Rav Yitz 

Who'll Go Right Through The Book And Break Each And Every Law (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "I Need A Miracle")

This week, Canada celebrated Canada Day (formerly known as Dominion Day) and the United State celebrated Independence Day. Both countries are the embodiment of the “New World”, a world built upon laws, democracy and based upon a dream that the future is genuinely brighter and more hopeful than the “Old World’s” paralyzing history and restrictive social mores. Both countries offer a possibility, an opportunity and that one ought to be judged by the “content of character”, not by skin colour, country of origin, wealth, or family connections. Both countries have always made it clear that no person is above the law: Not the poorest, not the wealthiest, not the meekest, not the most powerful.  So as my children celebrate both Canada Day and Independence Day; I feel compelled to remind them that what they should keep in mind when they celebrate is that more than any form of government more than any form of a society’s basic principle of organization; Democracy is the holiest form of government and, besides Torah, Democracy is one of the holiest organizing principles of a society. Like Torah, in Democracy the Law is sacred, the law is Holy, and no king no leader is above the Law. Like Torah, Democracy and Law work best when it avoids fundamentalism/extremism of the left and right; but rather sticks to the middle (Deut. 28:14).

This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few Psukim of the Parsha are a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha: Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of Moabite/Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behaviour by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded it 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and are poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter into Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. This brief narrative is about the “Daughters of Tzelophchad”. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals etc).

Isn't it odd, or perhaps even disturbing, that Pinchas' zealousness, his subsequent spear throwing and impaling his targets appears rewarded with a Brit Shalom - a Covenant of Peace and Brit Kehunat Olam - a covenant of an everlasting Priesthood? (Num. 25:12). Through our modernist lens, many readers will perceive Pinchas’ act to be nothing more than fanaticism or vigilantism. It appears as if vigilantism is rewarded. To offer Pinchas Peace and the Priesthood becomes seems incomprehensible. The NeZiV (Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Berlin Poland 1817-1893; the Rosh Yeshiva of the Volozhin Yeshiva) offers a fascinating explanation that might be valuable in today's’ age of extremists recruiting young people. The NeZiV explains that the Brit Shalom is a guarantee of peace from an inner enemy from whatever lurked within Pinchas that caused him to kill another human being without due process. "The Holy One Blessed He blessed him [Pinchas] with the attribute of peace, that he should not be quick-tempered or angry. Since it was only natural that such a deed as Pinchas' should leave in his heart an intense emotional unrest afterward, the Divine blessing was designed to cope with this situation and promised peace and tranquility of the soul." We can now begin to make some sense of these covenants. Once Pinchas committed his first act of zealous defence of God's glory, perhaps it becomes easier and easier to commit the second, third or forty-eighth act of zealous defence of God's glory. At some point, from the NeZiV's perspective, the zealot's soul becomes damaged, the zealot's emotions are incapable of feelings, and the zealot's eyes become unseeing except through the lens of their zealousness. The zealot by definition is an extremist and we know that extremism in Judaism is frowned upon and halachically unacceptable (see the laws of the Nazarite).  Precisely because the zealot does not know peace when he/she commits such an act, in Pinchas' case the only gift God could give was that the tumult of his own soul should cease and he should be whole, complete and at peace.

Yes, Pinchas saved a community from further pain and suffering by hurling that spear at Zimri and Omri. Yes, Pinchas murdered that Prince of the tribe of Shimon and that Princess Midian. The Covenant isn’t so much a reward but rather it is a salve or a balm for the tumult within Pinchas’ soul. Now, Pinchas and his descendants could ill afford to ever act as vigilantes, Pinchas and his descendants could ill afford to take on a such a fundamentalist attitude because Pinchas has now been thrust into a position of leadership and rather than embracing the fundamentalist and tumultuous aspect of soul, he must rather embrace the calm, loving demeanor of his grandfather, Aaron, who chased after Justice and loved Amcha.  

Peace,

Rav Yitz

It's Even Worse Than It Appears, But It's Alright (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "Touch of Grey")

It has been a fascinating week. Our children have been studying for exams and the tension has been palpable. There have been complaints. There have been criticism directed at teachers, subject matter, the school, the schedule, the necessity of exams, and knowing what to study. As I listened to the complaints, as I tried to be the patient father and validate my children’s emotions, I finally cracked and told them to stop complaining, stop making excuses. It turned out that this week also brought the new American President and his advisors introducing a new term to the American political lexicon: “alternative facts”. Where were “alternative facts” when I was a teenager! Any trouble I got into as teenager, would have been greatly diminished had I had access to “alternative facts”.  Where were “alternative facts” when I was struggling in 11^th grade chemistry class? If I had alternative facts I would have earned an “A”, and I would never been in trouble since I would never have done anything wrong or violated any of my parents rules. I made my children watch the interview in which “alternative facts” were introduced.  They quickly understood the danger involved with “alternative facts”. With alternative facts, one never needs to take responsibility for his/her actions. With alternative facts, there are no laws, no rules, no consensus on propriety and civilized behavior. With alternative facts there is chaos. With alternative facts, ignorance replaces science. Certainly my kids would probably prefer a world of “alternative facts.” However, deep down they understand that a world built upon science, scientific inquiry, empirical evidence, and scientific facts operates much better than a world built upon alternative facts and alternative science.

This week we read from Parsha Va’Eira. In this Parshah, God reassures Moshe after Pharaoh mocked and dismissed both he and Aharon. God explains that he will cause Pharaoh’s heart to harden after each plague, but eventually Pharaoh will capitulate and free the Hebrew slaves. God explains the various stages of redemption to Moshe. The plagues begin. We are supposed to understand that each of these first seven plagues is more severe than the previous plague: Blood, Frogs, Lice, Wild Beasts, Animal plague, Boils, Hail. Moshe requests that Pharaoh permit B’nai Yisroel to worship God for three days. At times, Pharaoh acquiesces and there are moments he changes his mind. Sometimes he asks Moshe to pray on his behalf and sometimes he doesn’t. One thing is clear, that whenever Pharaoh gets his way (a plague ceases), something that would clearly indicate the power of God, Pharaoh behaves like a petulant child. He returns to his arrogant self-centered nature. It seems that Pharaoh is operating under an alternative set of facts regarding Hashem’s authority and power. By the Parsha’s conclusion, the plague of Hail has devastated the land and killed anything that was outside, Pharaoh expresses the evolution of his belief system based upon facts, not alternative facts nor upon an incorrect interpretation facts.

Two men, Moshe and Pharaoh, two groups, Hebrew slaves and Egyptian task masters, experience a type of revelation. Moshe is told by God, “Ani Adoshem VaEira el Avraham El Yitzchak v’ El Yaakov B’Eil Shaddai U’Shmi Adoshem Lo Nodati LaHem – I am Hashem, I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as El Shaddai, but with My Name Hashem, I did not make Myself known to them (Ex. 6:2) With Signs and Wonders, God wanted Moshe and B’nai Yisroel to know exactly who God is.  V’Yadu Mitzrayim Ki Ani Adoshem, BinToti et Yadi Al Mitzrayim V’Hotzeiti et Bnai Yisroel MiTocham – And Egypt Shall know that I am Hashem, when I stretch out My hand over Egypt; and I shall take the Children of Israel out from among them (Ex. 7:5). With each ensuing plague, God wanted Pharaoh and Egypt to know and accept, as fact, of God’ existence and God’s authority.  What is being transmitted? Ani Adoshem – I am Hashem, the fact that Hashem exists and has a covenantal relationship with his people.  How is this fact transmitted? Vaiera – I appeared through signs and wonders or as a harbinger of plagues. It depends who is experiencing the appearance and how that experience is perceive. For the Egyptians, God displays God’s presence through plagues. For Bnai Yisroel, God displays God’s presence through signs and wonders. That is to say each interprets Gods presence according to their values, their perceptions, their world view and their place within the world. However, there is one fact, one truth, one God, everything else, is perception and interpretation. This is the lesson that Moshe and B’nai Yisroel will be reminded of and this is the lesson that Pharaoh, a man who thought himself to be as God, will eventually learn and accept.

                Alternative facts can be very dangerous.  Alternative facts are the tools of dictators and kings. When society accepts alternative facts, it ultimately accepts moral relativism and becomes corrupt. History should remind us of dangers of “alternative facts” with the rise and fall of dictatorships and totalitarian regime. On a much smaller scale, the acceptance of alternative facts makes it impossible to learn, to discuss or debate. For my kids, acceptance of alternative facts would not only lead to flunking exams, it would diminish their emotional and intellectual development since they would never learn to take responsibility for their deeds and actions. With freedom, comes responsibility. This is the lesson that the Hebrew Slaves began learning in Parsha Va’Eira, and it is a lesson that we continue to learn today.

Peace,

Rav Yitz

So Many Roads I Know All I Want Is One To Take Me Home (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "So Many Roads")

Earlier this week, there were two legal cases, and two government responses in two different countries. In Saudi Arabia, a Shia cleric, speaking to the 20% Shia minority in Saudi Arabia, was accused of, and convicted of terrorism. He was found guilty and beheaded. As a result Iran, a Shia country, burned the Saudi Embassy in Tehran and both countries have cut off diplomatic relations with each other. In Israel, a right wing Israeli extremists were convicted of murdering a Palestinian family (both parents and a baby died while the Right Wing Jewish group burned the house down). One within the group was caught, tried and convicted, the government is looking for the other conspirators. Meanwhile the young man that was caught, convicted and sentenced will serve a stiff prison term.  Both countries are considered allies to the West. However only one country is a society built upon laws that protect its citizens, no matter the religion, ethnic background, or whether it is the majority of the population or the minority of the population. The other country is a society built upon laws that protect the governing class and the majority of the population at the expense of all of its citizens. Israel understand that for Democracy to function, a government must protect its citizens even if those citizens have a different and perhaps threatening belief system. Saudi Arabia understand that for despotism to exist, there can be no tolerance for challenging the kingdom.  In the long run, which society stand a better chance of surviving the tumult and chaos of the Middle East?

In this week’s Parsha, Va’eira, we read of the importance of leadership while avoiding arrogance. We read of leaders remaining in touch with Amchah (the people), even when Amchah doesn’t listen, fails to cooperate and even challenges the leadership. We read of the terrible results when leadership becomes arrogant, out of touch, and without a sense of limits. We learn that seven times Moshe and Aharon went before Pharaoh and asked that B’nai Yisroel be freed in order to serve God in the wilderness. Seven times Pharaoh’s heart hardens and he refuses. The Parsha begins with G-d telling Moshe of the covenant, and that although he revealed himself to Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov; he did so with a different name (Ex. 6:3). Therefore, we can surmise that Moshe had a very different type of revelation and relationship with G-d than our forefathers.

This different relationship manifests itself in the conversation that transpires in Ex.6:10-13. “Then the Lord spoke to Moshe saying: Go and tell Pharaoh King of Egypt to let B’nai Yisroel out of his land. But Moshe spoke before the Lord saying: Look, B’nai Yisroel have not heeded me; how then will Pharaoh heed me, seeing I am of uncircumcised lips? So the Lord spoke to Moshe and Aharon and commanded them to B’nai Yisroel and Pharaoh King of Egypt to bring the children of Israel out of Egypt.” God never spoke this way to any of the Avot (Avraham Yitzchak and Yaakov). Nor did they speak to God like Moshe. While there are many ways to understand God’s response to a dejected Moshe, certainly one way is within the context of leadership. God essentially tells Moshe to get back out there with his brother and do what needs to be done. God also tells Moshe, that both he and Aharon must first go to their constituency even before confronting Pharaoh. Why go to B’nai Yisroel? They don’t listen and they don’t pay attention. Besides, the authority that Moshe and Aharon must confront is Pharaoh, not B’nai Yisroel. Moshe and Aharon must remain in touch with the people, even if that means increased frustration and diminished efficiency in achieving the ultimate goal.

God implicitly tells Moshe that humility is required for leadership. Rambam re-iterates this in a specific ruling: “It is forbidden for a person to lord it over the community in a domineering manner but he must exercise his authority with humility and reverence; it is likewise forbidden to treat the people with disrespect even if they are ignorant… Though they may be ordinary common folk, they are the children of Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov…. He [the leader] should rather bear patiently the cumbrance of the community and their burden…Look at Moshe…God gave them a charge to Israel which our tradition takes to mean that  Moshe and Aharon accepted the yoke of leadership of the people on the understanding that they will curse and stone them.” This first step in humble leadership is acknowledgment of limitations. Hence, we read Ani Adonai, “I am the Lord”, seven times in the Parsha. Moshe and Aharon should never forget that. While it may be humbling for the leader to admit that there is still a greater being, it is even more humbling for any leader to admit that he/she must also be answerable to the people. Moshe and Aharon learn this lesson. Pharaoh does not.

Democracy is predicated upon the idea that leadership must be subject to the same laws as the citizenry.  The government, the majority cannot “lord itself” over the community in a domineering dictatorial manner. From a dictator’s perspective this is certainly inefficient and perhaps even “messy”. However when a government and/or the ruling class forget that, and lord itself over the community for a long enough time corruption increases and ultimately society grows unstable. Whatever frequent, irrational, and illogical criticism of Israel; it has been fascinating to watch how quiet the world has been in criticizing Israel about this particular trial and its results. For a change, the world seems to be more aware of the intra-Islamic fight between Shia and Sunni that has been going on for centuries and has reared its ugly sectarian head yet again as tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia continue to increase.

Peace,

Rav Yitz