You Read About Samson, All From His Birth; He Was The Strongest Man Who Ever Lived On Earth (Traditional)

          Earlier this week, June 6th, was the 78th anniversary of the Allied invasion of Normandy, otherwise known as  D-Day. On June 6th, 1944, Canadian, American, British, Australian, and other allied forces, crossed the English Channel, established a beach head on the several beaches on the French coast around Normandie, and began a 10-month bloody arduous journey that led to the surrender of Nazi Germany and the end of WWII in Europe. In the years and decades that followed, it has often been suggested that these men saved the world from Hitler’s 1000 Year Reich. Those that died on the beaches of Normandie, those that died on the roads that ultimately led to Berlin, and those that survived those 10 months of fighting and made their way back home all engaged in something heroic. Those allied forces participated in something extraordinary, and, indeed, that makes them all heroes.  However, these heroes who saved the world were not perfect souls, without flaws,  with negative or even destructive human qualities. 

          This week's Parsha is Naso. It covers a variety of topics. First, we read that once again, God commands Moshe to count. This time Moshe takes a census of the families in the tribe of Levi. Each family has a very specific role concerning the maintenance of the Mishkan (the Tabernacle). After the census, we are reminded that anyone in contact with a corpse is considered impure and must be removed from the camp for a period of time. We are also told that besides capital punishment, certain crimes toward members of the community are punishable by fines. We read about Sotah, the bitter waters a woman accused of adultery must drink. If she survives the ordeal, then she is innocent. On the day the tabernacle was finally completed, each leader of each of the twelve tribes brought gifts. Each day, a different tribe brought these gifts.

          Before the twelve tribes bring their respective offerings, we read about those individuals who, if they so choose, can take upon themselves vows of abstinence. They are called Nazarites, and, indeed, they “volunteer” for a type of “spiritual heroism”.  In the Haftarah for Parsha Naso, we read about the birth of the most famous Nazir, Samson. However, as “spiritual heroic” as the Nazir might be; the vow of abstinence consists of no wine, no grapes, no haircut, and no contact with the dead (including parents and siblings). The Nazir puts himself in a circumstance where he tests his “spiritual strength”.  His abstinence is a vow of purity; he shall not have any contact with death. "All the days of his abstinence he is holy to God." (Num. 6:8). Interestingly, enough, the minimum time frame of this vow is only 30 days. That is all it takes to be considered heroic within this community: thirty days, no grapes, no haircuts, and no contact with death. Ironically, when the Nazir's vow expires, sometime after thirty days, he cannot just re-enter society. Instead, he must bring two offerings to the Kohen: a burnt offering and a sin offering. A sin offering: imagine that! Here is an individual who has voluntarily taken on more restrictions. Here is an individual who has successfully achieved a higher degree of piety. Now, in order to re-enter society, that individual must bring a sin offering. Is this the price for greatness? What is the  Nazir’s sin? The Nazir, in his/her attempt to achieve a higher level of piety,  voluntarily cut him/herself off from the community. This contradicts much of what we read in the book of Leviticus and even in Numbers. One is separated from the community when deemed impure by coming into contact with death. Separation from the community is a means of maintaining the spiritual purity of the community. The object is to remain in the community and elevate the holiness and purity of the community. Nazir's actions contradict the aims of the community and only emphasized the individual. The Nazir cannot join the community in Kiddush. The Nazir cannot prepare appropriately for an upcoming holiday with the rest of the community. According to Halacha, one prepares for a holiday by cutting hair, washing clothes, and preparing festive meals. Nor can the Nazir, along with the community help those who grieve. As a result, the Nazir must atone for voluntarily separating him/herself from the community.  Torah recognizes that there are those individuals who may adopt certain fanatical love for Mitzvot and God. However, it is quite clear that the laws regarding the Nazir do not condone fanatic behavior. On the contrary, the restrictions are quite minimal, the time frame is minimal, and the message is clearly unmistakable. Fanaticism, as in the case of the Nazir or voluntarily cutting oneself off from the community in order to achieve a higher level of spirituality, is a sin. One must atone for this behavior.

         So where is the heroism? Heroism is not found in self-absorbed large actions. Heroism is not found in a one-shot deal. Heroism is not found in loud rhetoric. Heroism is found in the humility of small and usually selfless actions. Heroism is found in the constancy of appropriate behavior. Heroism is found in the quiet deeds that improve the community and the world without calling attention to oneself. Heroism occurs as part of something bigger than the individual. Heroism is the acceptance of the daily Mitzvot of Torah Study, Ethical/Menschlikite behavior, Prayer, and Gemilut Hasidim (Acts of Loving Kindness). We learn that heroism and greatness are something we can all achieve. 

Peace,
Rav Yitz

I Swear It On My Very Soul; If I Lie May I Fall Down Cold (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "Reuben and Cerise")

          Every religion, every society acknowledges the importance of making a vow, or swearing an oath, or “giving one’s word”. To accept a vow, oath, or another person’s “word” was a demonstration of trust, an act of faith that the other person would keep their vow, oath, or word. Without a mechanism for people to trust business would cease to occur, relationships would end,  and anarchy would reign. Where society and religions differ is the premium place upon the vow, oath, or a person’s word. The Judeo-Christian and Muslim cultures and traditions consider vows and oaths tantamount to invoking God’s name and violating an oath or a vow, therefore, is tantamount to “Taking God’s name in vain”. For the less observant or those who don’t affiliate with a religion, a violation of an oath or a vow destroys a sacred trust. In a democratic society, trust is the lubricant,  that allows governments to govern. When the populace doesn’t trust its institutions there is chaos. Certainly, that is what we have watched occur in the United States over the past several years. Sadly, over the past week, once again we witnessed, elected officials who swear an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic…” fail to live up to that oath. A former Chief of Staff and former congressman who swore such an oath decided to protect and defend a former president instead of the Constitution. An entire political party, except for a handful of Congressman and Senator have pledged their fealty to authoritarianism instead of fulfilling their vows and oaths to the Constitution.  

          This morning we read from Parsha Vayechi. This is the final Parsha in the book of Breishit. The Parsha begins with Yaakov calling Yosef and making him swear an oath that he will not be buried in Egypt. He also blesses his grandsons Ephraim and Menashe. He gathers his sons together and offers each son a blessing or a prophecy. Yaakov dies and his sons take him out of Egypt and fulfill their vow. They bury their father in Heron alongside Avraham and Yitzchak and Sarah Rebecca and Leah. Afterward, the brothers fear that Yosef will finally take vengeance for their mistreatment of him. Yosef doesn’t, and the brothers and their families continue to grow and prosper in Goshen. As Yosef prepares for his death, he makes his brothers vow to take his bones out of Egypt and bury his bones in Eretz Canaan. 

          Yaakov’s final dying wish is to be buried in Canaan, in the Caves of the Machpela with his ancestors, Avraham/Sarah, Yitzchak/Rivka, and Leah his wife. Yaakov shares this wish with Yosef. Given his position within Egypt, Yosef would be the most likely of the sons who would be able to arrange this final wish. After sharing his final wish with his beloved son Yosef; Yaakov asks Yosef to swear to him that he will carry out this final wish. To demonstrate one’s “swearing a vow,” Yaakov tells Yosef: Im Nah Matzati Chein M’Einecha If now I have found grace in your eyes Sim Nah Yadcha Tachat Yereichi put, I pray of you, your hand beneath my thigh v’Asita Imadi Chesed v’Emet –,and deal kindly and truthfully with me. However, Yosef does not do as his father asks; Yosef does not put his hand beneath his father’s thigh as an indication of swearing an oath. Rather, Vayomer [Yosef] said, Anochi Eseh Chidvarecha – I personally will do as you said. The text clearly conveys that Yosef did not make a “vow” to Yaakov. Yosef did not put his hand beneath his father’s thigh as an indication of making a vow. Rather his said that he would take care of the matter personally.  Rabeinu Chananel, a tenth-century Egyptian Talmudic commentator, briefly and succinctly explains that the statement: Anochi Eseh M’Atzmi – I will take care of it myself suggests there is no need for swearing an oath. Rav Ovadia Sforno – the 16th Italian Renaissance Torah Commentator adds a more in-depth comment over the fact that Yosef did not at first swear an oath to Yaakov’s final request. Anochi Metzad Atzmi Eseh Kidvarecha B’Chol Chai – As far as I am concerned, I will do as you say with all my power. Yosef’s response suggests a built-in excuse in case he cannot fulfill the dying wish. “I will do everything in my power” suggests that if Yosef entreats Pharaoh to let him bury his father in Canaan, and Pharaoh refuses; then Yosef still fulfilled his father’s final wish since Yosef did everything he could.  Yaakov senses his hesitation and tells Yosef: Hishava Li – Swear to me, Vayishava Lo – and He [Yosef] swore to him [Yaakov]. Yaakov does not want any excuses nor does he want Yosef to have to rely solely upon his own relationship with Pharaoh. Pharaoh will understand a son swearing an oath to his dying father and would never refuse a request of that nature. As a son, as a free person, as the second most powerful person in Egypt, Yosef is only bound by his conscience. He is free to question. The Malbim, the 17th-century commentator explains that Yosef was acting as a son should be bound by filial piety and integrity.

          There are moments where one’s own volition is not enough in fulfilling a final wish. Yaakov makes Yosef swear the oath because he wants Yosef to acknowledge an authority greater than his own. He also wants Yosef to acknowledge an authority greater than Pharaoh. Yaakov wanted Yosef to be completely powerless and act solely on behalf of his father. Under normal circumstances, according to ChaZaL – our Talmudic sages of Blessed Memory, the acceptance of Torah and its commandments are an acknowledgment and acceptance of an external authority greater than ourselves. Intrinsic to that acceptance is a humbling awareness that we are not all that powerful or in control of every aspect of life. As more and more information comes becomes public about the January 6th Capitol Hill attack and attempted coup, it becomes more and more clear, that numerous people who had sworn an oath to the U.S. Constitution, due to political expediency, violated that oath and pledged fealty to authoritarianism. They continue to do so to this day. Unfortunately, history provides many examples from the last century when elected officials violate their oaths, trust wanes, institutions cease to function and authoritarianism wins the day. Hopefully, bringing light and attention to that day will remind elected officials of the importance of their oaths, vows, and keeping their word to support and defend.

Peace 

Rav Yitz

"Come In," She Said, "I'll Give You Shelter From The Storm" (Bob Dylan: Shelter From The Storm)

           I spent this past week finishing up my final days of quarantine. I took my Covid Test and had a requisite Negative result  72 hours prior to my returning to the border, took the Covid Test upon my arrival at the border two weeks ago, took my Day 8 Covid test and received the negative result three days later, I have received the daily phone calls, filled out my daily questionnaire on the ArriveCan app. Oh, I was already fully vaccinated prior to my driving out of Canada. I was even visited by someone from Health Canada inquiring about my quarantine three days before the rules for re-entry and quarantine changed for Canadian citizens and Permanent Residents of Canada. During this time, I began to wonder about the logic and science of it all.  Six months ago, even three months ago, I completely understood the rationale of the testing and the 14-day quarantine. Back then,  Canada was at the beginning of the vaccination rollout process and there were all kinds of issues regarding supply. As I entered my final days of quarantine, Ontario had more than 70% of its population with one shot and nearly 30% of its population fully vaccinated.  I have been fully vaccinated for more than 5 weeks. I had no Covid 72 hours prior to crossing the border 15 days ago Friday. I was negative when I crossed the border. I was negative 8 days into quarantine. So, when I was visited by Health Canada, I asked him the logic of remaining in quarantine.

          This Shabbat, we read from the final two Parshiot in Sefer Bemidbar (Book of Numbers): Matot and Masei.  This double Parsha begins with the laws of Nedarim (Vows), and then B'nai Yisroel fights against the Midianites. Moshe rebukes his officers for their collective failure to deal with the Midianite woman since they were the cause of Bnai Yisroel’s plague in the first place. Bnai Yisroel then begins the process of dividing the spoils of this battle. Two tribes, Reuben and Gad request to settle in the land east of the Jordan River and not the land promised by Hashem. Moshe expresses his anger over the request and the two tribes amend their request. Moshe adds a condition and an agreement is reached. The Torah recounts the various stops that Bnai Yisroel made on their journey to Eretz Canaan, the boundaries of Eretz Canaan are clarified, the new leadership is introduced and the cities of refuge of explained and established. Finally, Sefer Bemidbar concludes with a reminder of the laws for tribal inheritance. With all those loose ends neatly sewn up; B'nai Yisroel now sits on the eastern bank of the Jordan River waiting to enter Eretz Canaan. As we conclude the reading, we say Chazak Chazak v’ NitChazeik – From strength to strength we shall go forward in strength.

           The Arei Miklaat, the Cities of Refuge, were essentially places to quarantine. No, these quarantine-like Cities of Refuge were not instituted for medical purposes. Rather the Cities of Refuge were designed for those individuals accused of manslaughter. In order to avoid the victim's family, the perpetrator could flee to one of these cities and quarantine,  seeking refuge. However, instead of remaining in quarantine for 14 days, the individual would have to remain there until the death of Kohen, or for 40 years. These cities were, by design, cities for the Leviim for the Priests. These cities were supported by the tribal lands in which the cities existed. By design, these cities had a different status. V’Eit He’Arim Asher Titnu Le’Leviim Et Shesh Arei Miklaat  Asher Titnu LaNus Shamah HaRotzeach V’Aleihem Titnu Arbaim U’Shtayim Ir - And the cities that you shall give to the Levites shall be the six cities of refuge,  which you shall provide as places to which a murderer can flee. Besides these (six) you shall provide an additional forty-two cities (Num. 35:6). The six cities are for the Leviim, why then, does the verse include another statement which mentions the forty-two cities and for whom, are those cities? Do those cities also allow for a refuge, quarantine, or sanctuary? The Tifferet Shlomo, 19th century Polish Chassidic leader, offered a fascinating way to understand the verse. “The six cities of refuge allude to the six words in the verse Shema Yisroel, Adoshem Elokeinu  Hashem Echad - Hear O’ Israel, the Lord our God the Lord is One (Deut. 5:22). These words indeed provide a spiritual refuge for a Jew’s troubled soul. The additional forty-two cities suggest the forty-two words that make up the “Vehavta” the first paragraph of the Shema, through which a Jew submits his entire being to God’s will.”  

          Indeed, these words, these words of faith provide a refuge, a sanctuary, they allow us to quarantine, to heal, to become and remain spiritually inoculated. To a degree, the Tiferet Shlomo reminds us that the words of the Torah, Judaism itself is a refuge. No, the words of the Torah are not an escape from the world. However the words of Torah, Judaism allows us to infuse holiness into the mundane. That process, infusing holiness into our everyday lives, into everyday ordinary deeds provides a refuge from the mundane, and spiritually enriches one's life by adding meaning. So, after it was abundantly clear that I cannot possibly have the Covid Virus, and therefore cannot transmit what does not exist, the Health Canada person smiled and scratched his head. He said that my conclusion reflects science and logic and understanding. He agreed with me and explained that was the reason why all the checking would be winding down. Everyone now understands that there are legitimate moments to quarantine to seek protection. However, after multiple tests and being fully vaccinated, there is no scientific reason to continue the policy. He then warned me that all it takes is one individual who is not particularly thoughtful, and will be ridiculously overzealous in his/her job and still want to catch people breaking quarantine and issuing fines.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

I Swear To It On My Very Soul: If I Lie May I Fall Down Cold (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia - "Reuben and Cerise"

Well the Chanukah, Christmas New Years’ Vacation has concluded, kids have returned to school and the regular routine finally resumed this week. With this resumption of the daily routine, the news this week has been dominated by three events. The President gave his final speech from his adopted hometown of Chicago, the President Elect is scheduled to give his first press conference since the summer, and Senate nomination hearings for the President – Elect’s cabinet got underway. These three events were like a splash of icy cold water forcing me to confront the fact that Donald Trump was just over a week from taking the Presidential Oath to uphold the Constitution and to protect the United States.

This morning we read from Parsha Vayechi. This is the final Parsha in the book of Breishit. The Parsha begins with Yaakov calling Yosef and making him swear an oath that he will not be buried in Egypt. He also blesses his grandson’s Ephraim and Menashe. He gathers his sons together and offers each son a blessing or a prophecy. Yaakov dies and his sons take him out of Egypt and fulfill their vow. They bury their father in Heron alongside Avraham and Yitzchak and Sarah Rebecca and Leah. Afterwards, the brothers fear that Yosef will finally take vengeance for their mistreatment of him. Yosef doesn’t, and the brothers and their families continue to grow and prosper in Goshen. As Yosef prepares for his death, he makes his brothers vow to take his bones out of Egypt and bury his bones in Eretz Canaan.

Yaakov’s final dying wish is to be buried in Canaan, in the Caves of the Machpela with his ancestors, Avraham/Sarah, Yitzchak/Rivka and Leah his wife. Yaakov shares this wish with Yosef. Given his position within Egypt, Yosef would be the most likely of the sons who would be able to arrange this final wish. After sharing his final wish with his beloved son Yosef; Yaakov asks Yosef to swear to him that he will carry out this final wish. To demonstrate one’s “swearing a vow” Yaakov tells Yosef: Im Nah Matzati Chein M’Einecha If now I have found grace in your eyes Sim Nah Yadcha Tachat Yereichi put, I pray of you, your hand beneath my thigh v’Asita Imadi Chesed v’Emet –,and deal kindly and truthfully with me. However Yosef does not do as his father asks; Yosef does not put his hand beneath his father’s thigh as an indication of swearing and oath. Rather, Vayomer [Yosef] said, Anochi Eseh Chidvarecha – I personally will do as you said. The text clearly conveys that Yosef did not make a “vow” to Yaakov. Yosef did not put his hand beneath his father’s thigh as an indication of making a vow. Rather his said that he would take care of the matter personally.  Rabeinu Chananel, a tenth century Egyptian Talmudic commentator, briefly and succinctly that Anochi Eseh M’Atzmi – I will take care of it myself  hence there is no need for swearing an oath. Rav Ovadia Sforno – the 16^th Italian Renaissance Torah Commentator adds a more in depth comment over the fact that Yosef did not at first swear an oath to Yaakov’s final request. Anochi Metzad Atzmi Eseh Kidvarecha B’Chol Chai – As far as I am concerned, I will do as you say with all my power. Yosef’s response suggest an out in case he cannot fulfill the dying wish. “I will do everything in my power” suggests that if Yosef entreats Pharaoh to let him bury his father in Canaan, and Pharaoh refuses; then Yosef still fulfilled his father’s final wish since Yosef did everything he could.  Yaakov senses he hesitation and tells Yosef: Hishava Li – Swear to me, Vayishava Lo – and He [Yosef] swore to him [Yaakov]. Yaakov does not want any excuses nor does he want Yosef to have to rely solely upon his own relationship Pharaoh. Pharaoh will understand a son’s swearing an oath to his dying father and would never refuse a request of that nature.

Clearly the commentators saw something in Yosef’s hesitancy. Why would Yosef hesitate about taking swearing an oath to his father? How could the favorite son hesitate and not swear an oath to his dying father? The last time we saw an old man asking someone to “swear an oath” to him in the Torah was Avraham asking his servant to put his hand beneath Avraham’s thigh and swear that he would bring back a girl from Avraham’s tribe in order to marry Yitzchak. The servant unhesitatingly swore the oath to Avraham. The Midrash explains the difference between Avraham’s servant’s behavior and Yosef’s behavior: HaEved Asa K’Avadoto Uven Chorin Asah K’Chiruto – Rabbi Yitzchak said: The servant acted like a servant and the free man acted as a free man, The servant acted like a servant, as it is says ‘And the servant put his hand beneath his [Avraham’s] thigh; While the freeman acted as a free person: ‘And he said, I will do as you said’’ As a free individual, Yosef is only bound by his conscience. He is free to question. The servant on the other hand, has no such ability. He is bound to fulfill his obligations whether forced or unforced. The Malbim, the 17^th century commentator explains that Yosef was acting like a son should. Yosef was trying to act out of filial responsibility, based upon his own free will rather than a servant who is bound by oaths.

There are moments where one’s own volition is not enough in fulfilling a final wish. Yaakov makes Yosef swear the oath because he wants Yosef to acknowledge an authority greater than his own. He also wants Yosef to acknowledge an authority greater than Pharaoh. Yaakov wanted Yosef to be completely powerless and act solely on behalf of his father. Under normal circumstances, according to ChaZaL – our Talmudic sages of Blessed Memory, the acceptance of Torah and its commandments are an acknowledgment and acceptance of an external authority greater than ourselves. Intrinsic to that acceptance is a humbling awareness that we are not all that powerful or in control of every aspect of life. In little more than a week, Donald Trump will take Presidential oath, hopefully he will understand the gravity of the office and the importance of serving the office with humility and dignity and without arrogance. Well, here’s hoping.

Peace

Rav Yitz

Promises Made In The Dark Dissolve By Light Of Day (Robert Hunter & Bob Weir -"Easy Answers")

Earlier this week, I woke up turned on my favorite morning news show, sipped my coffee and for the first time in my life I felt torn between my being American and being Jewish. No, my rights, as an American citizen, were not somehow being restricted because I am Jewish. I am still free to practice my religion. However, for the first time, I felt my allegiance being pulled between the American part of me and the Zionist part of me.  The Iran Nuclear Agreement scares me. I have always believed under the current Iranian regime, that a nuclear Iran poses an existential threat to Israel, (and a strategic threat to the North America). So while the West, and particularly the United States negotiated a deal base on strategic issues, Israel always had a very legitimate concern that Iran poses an existential threat.  Yet, this agreement, these words, these series of vows, oaths, promises and covenants mean that we, the West, and (therefore Israel) will now know with greater certainty than before, what the Iranians are doing with their nuclear program. Admittedly, that doesn’t make me feel much better, no does it assuage my concerns for Israel. Why? Like many in Congress, and certainly like many Jews and for that matter may Sunnis including Saudi Arabia, I don’t trust the Iranian Regime. Since there is no trust that the current Regime will keep its word, then the vows, the oaths, the promises don’t mean very much. The sanctity of words, the sanctity of a vow and oath is based entirely upon trust. This agreement, like many agreements of this kind, the 1985 agreement between the U.S. under Reagan’s administration and the former Soviet Union on Gorbachev was based upon Reagan’s idea of “Trust but Verify”. However “Trust but Verify” seems to undermine the importance and the sanctity of the spoken/ written word, vow, oath, and covenant.

This Shabbat, we read from the final two Parshiot in Sefer Bemidbar (Book of Numbers): Matot and Masei.  This double parsha begins with the laws of Nedarim (Vows), and then Bnai Yisroel fights against the Midianites. Moshe rebukes his officers for their collective failure to deal with the Midianite woman since they were the cause of Bnai Yisroel’s plague in the first place. Bnai Yisroel then begins the process of dividing the spoils of this battle. Two tribes, Reuben and Gad request to settle in land east of the Jordan River and not the land promised by Hashem. Moshe expresses his anger over the request and the two tribes amend their request. Moshe adds a condition and an agreement is reached. The Torah recounts the various stops that Bnai Yisroel made on their journey to Eretz Canaan, the boundaries of Eretz Canaan are clarified, the new leadership is introduced and the cities of refuge of explained and established. Finally, Sefer Bemidbar concludes with a reminder of the laws for tribal inheritance. With all those loose ends neatly sewn up; Bnai Yisroel now sits on the eastern bank of the Jordan River waiting to enter Eretz Canaan. As we conclude the reading, we say Chazak Chazak v’ NitChazeik – From strength to strength we shall go forward in strength.

The beginning of the Parsha, with its focus upon Nedarim v’Shvuot Vows and Oaths, we are being reminded of two vital concepts. First we are reminded of the Aseret Dibrot, of the Ten Commandments and specifically invoking God’s name in vain.  Ish Ki Yidor Neder L’adoshem When a man takes a vow to Hashem (Num. 30:3). Part of the process by which one makes a vow is to invoke God name. Therefore, a failure to keep the vow or the oath means that one has used God’s name in vain. The repercussions of which are extremely serious.  Second, we learned in Sefer Breishit (Book of Genesis) that speech is holy. Speech is part of the God’s creative process; Vayomer Elokim, Yehi Or, VaYahi Or- And God said: Let there be Light; and there was light. In a sense, speech is perhaps one of the only actions available to us that allows us to emulate God. When we make a vow or an oath, we are acting similar to God. A Neder is a pledge to prohibit oneself from something that that the Torah permits. Or a Neder can be obligating oneself to something that the Torah considers to be optional. Obligating one’s self to contribute to a specific charity would be an example of "obligating that which is optional". Refraining from apples would be an example of prohibiting something that is originally acceptable. In either case the individual is truly acting like God. The individual is creating Halacha and making his vow and or oath becomes tantamount to Torah. Clearly this cannot be taken lightly. After all, the severity of the language is a function of the fact that one makes this vow, pledge or oath to God and not to ones self or to another.  Fundamental to our vows with God is a trust in the relationship, trust that it exists, trust that it is desired by both and trust that is must be treated as sacred.

Like B’nai Yisroel recounting where they have been to arrive at this point in history, I look back and recount where the relationship between Israel and the United States has been and I wonder how we arrived at this point, a point where Trust and Verify has taken on a completely different meaning. In the world of “Trust but Verify” lies the fact that the side that does the verifying trusts that the side being verified will do everything it can to not keep its oaths, its vows and its promises. If there was truly mutual trust, then obviously there is no need to verify since the word, the vow, the oath is sacred since it is the embodiment of a Godly action: speech.  So now I have to trust that my government will keep its longstanding vow to Israel, to stand with Israel, to protect Israel, to “have Israel’s back” as the President said. I wish there was a way that we could trust but verify those words, those vows and those oaths. Maybe then Israel and the United States can Chazak v’Chazak Nitchazeik – from strength to strength go forward in strength.  

Peace,

Rav Yitz