Red And White, Blue Suede Shoes; I’m Uncle Sam, How Do You Do (Robert Hunter & Jerry Garcia -" U.S. Blues")

           This week, Canada celebrated its national birthday and early next week, the United States will celebrate its national birthday. Both countries are the embodiment of the “New World'', a world based upon laws, democracy, and a dream that the future is genuinely brighter and more hopeful than the past. Both countries offer possibility, opportunity and aspire to create a society where one ought to be judged by the “content of character”, not by skin color, country of origin, wealth, or family connections. Both countries have always made it clear that no person is above the law: Not the poorest, not the wealthiest, not the meekest, not the most powerful.  So as my children celebrate both Canada Day and Independence Day; I feel compelled to remind them that what they should keep in mind when they celebrate is that more than any form of government more than any form of a society’s basic principle of social organization; Democracy is the holiest form of government and, besides Torah, Democracy is one of the holiest organizing principles of a society. Like Torah, in Democracy the Law is sacred, the law is Holy, and no king, no leader is above the law. Like Torah, Democracy and Law work best when it avoids fundamentalism/extremism of the left and right; but rather sticks to the middle (Deut. 28:14).

          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Pinchas. The first few Psukim of the Parsha is a direct continuation of the previous Shabbat Parsha Balak. There is no elapse of time in the narrative. Balak concludes with a plague upon B’nai Yisroel for its worship of the Moabite /Midianite god, Baal Peor. Aaron’s son Pinchas zealously acts by killing Zimri from the tribe of Shimon and Cozbi the Midianite woman. God tells Moshe to reward Pinchas for his behavior by giving him the Brit Shalom, the Covenant of Peace. This covenant is only for Pinchas and his descendants. Keeping in mind that B’nai Yisroel has now concluded its 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and is poised upon the eastern bank of the Jordan River; a new census is taken. Just like we needed to know how many left Egypt, we now need to know how many will enter Eretz Canaan. After the census is taken Moshe must judge a legal case concerning the laws of inheritance when a man has only daughters. Following this narrative, God commands Moshe to teach the new generation the laws for time-bound offerings including the Shabbat offering, the Rosh Chodesh offering, the offerings for the Shalosh Regalim (Three Pilgrimage Festivals, etc).

          In between the narrative of the Daughters of Tzlophchad and educating the new generation about all time-bound offerings that correspond to Shabbat, Festivals and Rosh Chodesh, Moshe makes a request of God. Acknowledging that he cannot go on forever, Moshe asks God for a successor.  Yifkod Hashem Elohei HaRuchot L’Chol Basar Eish Al Ha’Eidah, Asher Yeitzeh Lifneihem Va’Asher Yavo Lifneihem Va’Asher Yotzieim Va’Asher Y’Vieim V’Lo Tiheyeh Adat HaShem KaTzon Asher Ein LaHem Roeh - May Hashem, God of the spirits of all flesh appoint a man over the assembly, who shall go out before them and come in before them, who shall take them out and bring them in; and let the assembly of Hashem not be like sheep that have no shepherd (Num. 27:16-17). In these two verses, we learn about Moshe’s attitudes concerning the necessary qualities for leadership. A leader “ goes out before the people”, and not lead from behind. Like the shepherd, he looks after all the people including the most vulnerable members of the flock. Moshe does not foist his sons upon the people nor upon God as possible successors to Moshe. Even the way Moshe addresses God in this brief narrative suggests something less particularistic, less elitist, more “democratic” and more focused upon the content of character. Moshe refers to God as “the God of the spirits and all flesh”. Rashi explains that “God of spirits and all flesh” refers to God’s knowledge of the intricacies of the human mind, the complexities of human personality and that each individual’s character permits that person to succeed or fail in certain situations. God’s response to Moshe is simple and straightforward. God points to Joshua Asher Ruach Bo- because in him there is spirit (Num 27:18). Joshua has the necessary and appropriate character needed to lead B’nai Yisroel on the next phase of its national journey. Joshua is not from Moshe’s tribe, he is not Moshe’s son nor nephew. Joshua was evaluated solely upon the content of his character. He has Ruach Bo- the spirit within him. He possesses the right character for the job.

         No, there was no election to name Moshe’s successor, nor did the people choose. Despite that, God and Moshe taught this new generation, and every generation after, an important lesson about society. Certainly there social and religious institutions that were based upon the tribe, and upon birth. The Mishkan would be operated and maintained by the Leviim. Only descendants of Aaron, Elazar, and then Pinchas, could serve as the Kohen Gadol. Apart from the Temple and the institution of animal sacrifices,  leadership was based upon the content of character. Today, we understand that knowledge and the content of character are perhaps the most important qualities in our elected officials,  and our community leaders, especially in communities that aspire to the highest of democratic ideals. As parents, we teach our children to evaluate leaders based upon their knowledge and the content of their character, We hope that as our children make their way in the world, that they will also be judged for their knowledge and the content of their character. After all, judging one by the content of one’s character is as old as Joshua being named Moshe’s successors and as new as the noble experiments of democracy here in the “New World”.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

Every Man Is Prophet At The Mercy Of A Fool (Phil Lesh - "Equinox")

            Our 17, 19, and 21-year-old kids begin their summer camp jobs in Pennsylvania this week. The two younger ones will be counselors and the older one will be a unit head. With the packing completed, the car loaded, we headed out.  Our 17-year-old son asked his two older sisters what some of the challenges might be. Knowing that I had been a camp counselor many, years ago; he thoughtfully included me in the conversation.  So, his sisters spoke of their experiences and some of the challenges they had faced with campers. Finally, I spoke up and said that one of the biggest challenges facing their campers is a condition known as “PC”. No, PC doesn’t only stand for “Politically Correct”, PC also stands for Parentally Challenged. Many of their campers will be Parentally Challenged, this condition will manifest itself by being insecure, a misguided desire to “fit in with the cool kids”, or even suffer from severe “homesickness”.  I reminded them that their job is to teach and to demonstrate to their campers how to find “joy” and “happiness” in something other than all the negative stuff that some parents think will make their kids happy.  I reminded them that they had eight weeks to model a value system where a child need not be jealous of others or insecure with who and what they are. 

          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Balak. Balak was a Moabite King. After watching what B’nai Yisroel had done to the Ammonites, Balak was distressed. He realized that fighting B’nai Yisroel with a regular army was doomed to fail because he realized that God had blessed them. Being a clever king, Balak surmised that the only way to fight B'nai Yisroel was to fight them on a spiritual level. Since God blessed B'nai Yisroel, Balak wanted to find someone to curse them. There lived a prophet, a “Prophet Consultant,” a “hired gun” if you will, named Bilaam. King Balak hired Bilaam to curse B’nai Yisroel. God appears to Bilaam and instructs him to avoid cursing B’nai Yisroel. Bilaam ignores God’s instructions and heads off on his donkey towards B’nai Yisroel’s camp. Along the way, the donkey suddenly stops, and despite Bilaam’s prodding, the donkey refuses.  A sword-wielding “angel” appeared and the donkey continued to refuse Bilaam’s prodding. However, Bilaam, the prophet, the seer cannot see this “angel”.  Finally, Bilaam realizes that a divine force occupies the middle of the road and he must confront it. Bilaam listens and heads toward the camp. Looking down upon the encampment, Bilaam blesses B’nai Yisroel with words that we say upon entering into any synagogue, words that we teach our children at the youngest of ages. Ma Tovu Ohalecha Yaakov Mishkenotecha Yisroel – How goodly are your tents, O Jacob, your dwelling places O Israel – Kinchalim Nitayu K’ganot Alei Nahar K’Ahalim Natah Adoshem Ka’Arazim Alei Mayim – stretching out like brooks like gardens by the river, like aloes planted by Hashem, like cedars by the water (Num 24:5-6). Try as he might, Bilaam is unable to curse B'nai Yisroel, rather he blesses them.

          However, more than blessing B'nai Yisroel, Bilaam learned something else. He examined B’nai Yisroel and he reflected upon his own life. Whatever B'nai Yisroel has, he wishes it was bottled for his use. Tamot Nafshi Mot Yi’sharim Ut'hi Achariti Kamohu – May my soul die the death of the upright, and may my end be like this. Bilaam, a once materialistic, prophet for hire, looks out upon a peaceful people’s encampment. Bilaam looks out upon a warm caring community in which boundaries are observed, Derech Eretz is respected (the considerate treatment of one’s fellow man), observance of ritual, and the desire of everyone to live as a holy a life as possible is lived out every day in a million and one little ways. Bilaam looks out upon a nation that has achieved a sense of spiritual completeness, Shalem. This is a community that is at peace with itself, with a sense of purpose and destiny. If an entire nation has achieved this, what individual would not want this? Bilaam realized that this spiritual wholeness is attainable. If Bilaam realizes this, why don’t we?

          The community model that Bilaam sees and wants for himself is still possible today. Obviously, it takes work. Obviously, it takes a group of people with similar values, similar goals, and similar concerns for a community’s most vulnerable including children. Obviously, members of a community need to be "on the same page" in terms of spiritual priorities and a desire to learn. Members of a community need to care about one another, while simultaneously respecting each other’s space and privacy. It takes the parents of “parentally challenged kids” to stop worrying if their children will like them.  It takes parents' understanding that children are not little adults but rather children, children that mimic what we say, what we do, and how we behave towards others.  Gee, I can’t wait to hear how our kids handled “PC” kids and their parents.

Peace,
Rav Yitz 

Your Doorways Crawl With Fear (Bobby Peterson & Phil Lesh- "Pride of Cucamonga")

           Only our 16-year-old son awaits his second vaccine. The rest of us are fully vaccinated. This week has been remarkably similar to the previous Covid 19 years at this time. Our kids have been getting themselves packed for summer camp jobs in Pennsylvania. My wife has been finishing up with her school responsibilities and preparing for her summer camp job as well. Indeed, they are excited. Yet at the same time, we are constantly dealing with the very genuine fear and anxiety of “re-opening”. Their camp won’t be allowing visitors to camp as they want to create a bubble. Even though life seems to have opened “south of the border”, it is clear both socially and politically,  there remain concerns around the U.S. Canada border. Similar concerns have affected travel between provinces. A recent Poll from the end of May reflects that nearly 52% of Canadians have anxiety about re-opening, and that anxiety is higher in younger people ages 16-30. ( Stephanie Taylor, The Canadian Press CP24 New May 26th). The re-opening anxiety is not confined to Canada. It is a real thing. Roughly half of the United States shares the same anxiety. Part of the anxiety is based upon the notion that going outside will be different than before, however, we do not know exactly how different. Despite our best attempts to remain connected through phones and computers, relationships returning to “live” situations are just different from “virtual” relationships”.  Also, like any muscle that hasn’t been used, that begins to atrophy, the first few times it begins to get used, will cause soreness and even pain. It seems that the same holds true for re-opening. 

          This week we read from Parsha Chukkat. This Shabbat we read from Parsha Chukkat. Chukkat begins by telling us the Law for the Red Heifer. The Priest who prepares the mixture of water and the Red Heifers burnt ashes will render the entire nation spiritually pure; but the mixture will render him impure. A brief narrative concerning the death of Miriam, the lack of water, and B’nai Yisroel’s resulting anxiety and lack of faith leads to the issuance of another test of faith in the Wilderness. Moshe and Aaron don’t know what to do; so God tells them to speak to the rock and water will spring forth. Instead of following instructions, Moshe succumbed to his anger and hit the rock with his staff. Indeed water came out, the people drank, but Moshe and Aharon were punished. Aharon died and Moshe learned that he would not be able to enter into Eretz Canaan. As B’nai Yisroel resumes its wandering, they are attacked by Amalek. As a result, B’nai Yisroel must detour around the heart of Amalek territory. The people complain to Moshe again. They try to seek permission from the Sihon, the King of the Amorites, to pass through Amorite territory. Sihon denies permission and B’nai Yisroel attacks and eventually defeats the Amorites. Og King of Bashan tries to prevent B’nai Yisroel from marching through his land, B’nai Yisroel, with the help of Hashem, defeats King Og and his army.  The Parsha concludes with B’nai Yisroel settling on the Plains of Moab on the eastern side of the Jordan poised to enter Canaan.

            Towards the end of the Parsha, Moshe and B’nai Yisroel, now consisting mostly of a population that never experienced slavery firsthand, fought and battled against several of the indigenous tribes.  By this point, Moshe’s sister had passed away as well as his brother Aharon. Really, the only people that the Torah records as adult slaves in Egypt, who left Egypt, who crossed the Reed Sea, who stood at Sinai, who had been attacked by the Amalekites, who, like Moshe dealt with the negative report from 10 of the 12 spies were the two spies who offered a positive report: Joshua and Caleb.  Moshe is indeed the elder. After defeating the Sihon king of the Amorites, Moshe and B’nai Yisroel turn north. Vayifnu V’Yaalu Derech HaBashan And they turned and went up by the way of Bashan Vayeitze Og Melech HaBashan Likratam Hu V’ Chol Amo Lamilchama Edrei And Og the king of Bashan went out against them, he and all his people to the battle at Edrei. Vayomer HaShem El Moshe, Al Tirah Oto  And God said to Moses “Fear him not”. (Num. 21:33-34). Clearly, if God is telling Moshe to refrain from feeling scared, then obviously God is aware that Moshe is fearful.  Until this moment, at no point since embarking on this job as leader of the Jewish people and engaging in this incredibly close relationship to God, has Moshe displayed fear or been described as fearful.  So, Why now? Why after all that Moshe has been through with God and these people does God tell Moshe Al Tirah Oto? “Rashi, citing the Talmudic Tractate Niddah 61a, explains that Og was one of the last “giants' ' from the era of Noah and the Flood. It was Og, who had helped Abraham the Patriarch during his War with the 5 Kings. However, Rashi’s explanation and the Talmud’s explanation do not suggest that Moshe was afraid of the physical, “flesh and blood” of Og. God told Moshe Al Tirah Oto - Do not fear Oto. Oto means “him” and “it”. Is God telling Moshe not to fear “him”, (Og) or not to fear “it”,?  What would the “it” be referring to? Perhaps the “it” that Moshe should not fear is what Og symbolizes, the elimination of one of the last obstacles of Moshe and B’nei Yisroel fulfilling the covenant and entering into the land.  Moshe has just buried his sister and his brother. He must feel incredibly mortal and that something new is set to begin. Moshe is scared of “it”, fearful of the remainder of the process, the process of entry in Canaan. Moshe understands that “it” will not include him for much longer, and that could be a cause for fear and anxiety. 

         Apparently, Moshe’s fear was palpable. Given his age, the fact that he just buried his sister and brother, he knew that his time was drawing to an end. With each obstacle to the entry into Eretz Canaan eliminated, Moshe was one step closer to realizing his mission, transitioning out of leadership position, and ultimately never fully realize his He must have needed to address Moshe’s fear. To some extent, we have made adjustments in order to negotiate life amid a pandemic. We have refrained from hugging and shaking hands. We hesitate just a moment or two when we have to contend with large groups. We hesitate about things that we never used to be hesitant about. The anxiety of returning to “normal” is very real.  However, life amid the pandemic has meant that my wife and I have not had to worry about our son going out with his friends, and driving to high school parties. Life amid the pandemic has meant that we haven’t had to worry about him coming home late. Life amid the pandemic has meant that I haven’t had to stay awake in case of a late-night phone call or text telling me to pick him up. Life amid the pandemic has meant that we have not had to contend with a whole host of concerns and anxieties associated with the social life of teenage boys.  However, we all know that as soon as he receives the second dose of his vaccine, all that will change.  I guess being a parent means living with a certain amount of fear and anxiety, whether fully vaccinated or not.

Peace,
Rav Yitz 

Lord There Opened Up A Hole So Big, He Thought His Time Was Up (Rodney Crowell- "California Earthquake")

           I was reading the Times of Israel and the Jerusalem Post this week. I was getting more and more aggravated. Our son asked me what I was reading that caused me to become so upset. In an attempt to cheer me up, he even joked that the last time he saw me this upset was after the U.S. elections occurred when Trump and his minions spent every day until the inauguration screaming about “a stolen election” “the deep state”, and “and one of biggest conspiracies of all time”.  Of course all his and his minions’ hate, vitriol, lying,  race-baiting and conspiring, led traitorous right-wing, fascist, white supremacist organizations to riot at the United States Capitol.   Amid all the Israel bashing, amid all the Antisemitism and all the Jewish organizations screaming “anti-semitism” at various pop cultural influencers, and various political leaders, and Palestinian leaders, I am shocked at how quiet that same Jewish world has been with the vitriolic, poisonous rhetoric of Bibi Netanyahu, his followers, certain right-wing Orthodox Rabbis. Ever since a coalition was cobbled together to form 61 seats, a coalition that includes Right Wing Nationalists, Secularist, and Islamists, Bibi and his followers have cried out that the “deep state” is the cause of this illegal coalition, the “election was stolen”,  The head of the Shin Bet has warned that such provocative language served as motivation 26 years ago when a lone, ultranationalist gunman assassinated Yitzchak Rabin. The rhetoric then and now is remarkably the same. This coalition was successfully cobbled together after Netanyu was asked and failed to form a 61 seat coalition. Why the vitriolic poisonous rhetoric that claims this coalition is doing to destroy Israel? That’s easy, the right-wing Orthodox parties and rabbis are not part of the coalition. They backed Bibi. So now, they, along with their idol, Netanyahu, have been trying to scorch the earth, creating irreparable harm to Israel’s most noble experiment, a Jewish Democracy.  

          This week we read from Parsha Korach.  Korach was a relative of Moshe's. They both came from the tribe of Levi. Korach questioned Moshe, and soon Korach was leading a rebellion against Moshe. Moshe tried to keep peace within the community but to no avail. A divine test is administered, and Korach and his supporters fail. The earth swallowed them up. However, God is angry and a plague falls upon the people. However, B'nei Yisroel doesn't speak out against Korach. They don't "call him out". They are passive and because of their passivity, they are punished.  Yet the people are still not convinced that Moshe and Aharon should remain in charge, only that Korach was unworthy. So a second divine test is administered this time with 12 rods stuck in the ground and almond branches resulting in Aaron’s staff, thus symbolizing that God has chosen Aharon to be the Kohen Gadol.  The Parsha concludes with God speaking to Aharon and re-iterating his obligations in terms of the Mishkan, the Altar, and the Tent of the Meeting.

          The Torah portion begins rather innocuously, much like many rebellions. VaYikach Korach ben Yitzhar Ben Kahat ben Levi v’ Datan V’Aviram B’nai Eliav V’On ben Pelet Bnai Reuven – Korach son of Itzhar son of Kohath son of Levi took Datan and Aviram.  Korach “took” these men? Where did he “take” them? Rashi, the 11th-century French commentator, offers an explanation based upon the Midrash Tanchuma (a fifth-century compilation of rabbinic commentary). Rashi points out that VaYiKach he took - suggests that there should be a direct object. Since there is no direct object, Lakach Et Atzmo LTzad Echod – he [Korach] took himself off to one side or separated himself from the rest of the Leviim. By definition, a rebellion is a means of separating oneself from authority or from accepted norms. No, Korach wasn’t debating policy. Korach was questioning Moshe’s legitimacy as the leader. In a sense, Korach was questioning God’s authority. Korach was challenging God by asking, “why was Moshe chosen and not me?” Perhaps even more troubling than that question raises a crisis of faith.  “Who is God, that God should appoint a leader over us? Shouldn’t the people choose their own leader?”. Korach didn’t question Moshe’s authority in a private meeting between individuals. Rather, Korach gathered 250 supporters, and then publicly challenged Moshe. The public questioning, the tone, the vitriol eventually led to a rebellion and people died. Korach's rebellion against Moshe was not an attempt to create a better, more efficient form of governance. Instead, Korach's rebellion was an attempt to elevate his own stature, authority, and power. He gathered leaders from other tribes, tribes that were geographically near him that heard his complaints. He didn’t have the support of other Leviim.  Korach was the first great “disruptor”, challenging Moshe’s authority and the institutions that he helped to establish in order to keep B’nai Yisroel safe from all those threatening societies.  

So when will I be able to read the news out of Israel without angst, concern, and muttering under my breath? On June 14th,  the Knesset is scheduled to vote to approve of this new coalition and this noble and sacred experiment in Democracy.  Until then, another outgoing leader will scream, yell and spew the same poisonous vitriol, rhetoric, and winking and nodding to right-wing extremists as a  former  U.S. President. I explained to my son that in the meantime, while Israel and the world wait for the new coalition to actually assume its rightful place as the new government, it would be nice if those same Jewish organizations that call out the Anti-Semitism and Anti Zionism  call out the poisonous rhetoric, the hateful vitriol of Netanyahu and his extreme supporters before Jews turn on Jew. The Shin Bet has warned us that the political and religious environment is growing frighteningly similar to 26 years ago. The rhetoric and the words of the extreme right-wing Rabbinic community grow increasingly intolerant, self-righteous, and demonizing of fellow Jews. My son reminded me that the irony and the tragedy of  Netanyahu and his religious supporters is that they should know better since they are all too familiar with this “scorched earth” strategy, and the deadly rebellion of Korach.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

Tell Me A Lie And I Will Swear, I Will Swear It's True (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Lazy Lightning")

           In a few days, it will be June 6th, D-Day. Seventy-Six years ago, English, Canadian, and American soldiers crossed the English Channel, landed on the beaches of Normandie, and saved the world from the tyranny, fascism, and the heinous authoritarianism of the Third Reich. Nearly a year before D-Day,  OSS agent (The U.S. Intelligence Agency that eventually became the CIA) Walter Langer created a   psychological profile that explained Hitler's grip on power and on public opinion as follows: “His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one, and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.”   A “Big Lie”  justifies the corrupt megalomaniac's power and his believers’ actions. Whether it is a corrupt anti-democratic dictator from China, Russia, Belarus, or Iran or to dictators of nearly any authoritarian regime of the previous centuries, when people want to retain power or are threatened with losing power, they will resort to their own big lie.

          This Shabbat we read from Parsha Shlach Lecha. Parsha Shlach Lecha includes the troubling narrative of the 12 spies and the ensuing report of Eretz Canaan made to Moshe and B’nai Yisroel. However, following the negative report from ten of the twelve spies, God and Moshe realize that this generation is not yet ready to enter the land. This was the reason why B’nai Yisroel would now have to wait nearly 4 decades prior to entering Eretz Canaan. Yet towards the end of the Parsha, Torah makes it very clear, that despite this generation’s lack of faith, returning to the land is inevitable and a covenant that will be fulfilled. Ki Tavo’u El Eretz Moshvoteichem Asher Ani Notein Lachem –God spoke to Moshe saying: Speak to the Children of Israel and say to them: When you will come to the Land of your dwelling places that I give you…. (Num. 15:2). Meting out punishment did not remove hope, it did not remove inevitability, nor did it mitigate the covenant that God had made with Avraham, Yitzchak, Yaakov, or Moshe Rabeinu at Sinai. This punishment only delayed the inevitable until another generation was worthy enough to inherit the covenant.

Those ancient leaders of B’nai Yisroel, those ancient Princes of twelve tribes were appointed by Moshe. Ten of them were concerned about themselves, their dwindling authority. These ten had little concern for a covenant. In their report to Moshe, these ten first objectively praised the land (Num. 13:27-29). However objective reporting immediately gave way to the subjectivity of opinion (Num. 13:31). After departing from Moshe and Aaron, the spies ignore any objectivity and only offer their “expert” opinion. VaYotziu Dibat Ha’Aretz Asher Taru Otah El B’nai Yisroel Leimor -And they spread an evil report of the land which had been explored to the Children of Israel. The negative report claimed that the land at up its inhabitants, giants or Nephilim occupied the land and as the spies claim Vanhi v’Eineinu Ka’Chagavim V’Chein Hayinu B’Eineihem - and we were in our sight as grasshoppers and so we were in theirs (Numb. 13:32-33) The report played upon the fears of the people. They felt small, exposed, hopeless and they could not imagine entering the land.  Once again, national anxiety and hysteria cause B’nei Yisroel to yearn for Egypt.  Lo Matnu B’Eretz Mitzrayim - Would that we had died in the land of Egypt. (14:3) But this yearning for Egypt was different. This hysteria was not because they were experiencing hunger and thirst, it was based upon the subjective opinion of those then who seemed to have an air of authority about them. So the hysteria and desire to return to Egypt culminated in the following words. VaYomru Ish El Achiv Nitnah Rosh VNashuva Mitzraima -So they said to one another, “Let us appoint a leader and let us return to Egyp” (14:4). In the Talmudic Tractate Sanhedrin 107a, the Sages ask who would have been the leader to bring them back to Egypt? Their answer is incredibly revealing and proved prophetic, an idol. An Idol would have brought them back to Egypt. On the one hand, the sin of the spies was due to a lack of faith in God. On the other hand, the sin of the spies is a warning to all those who listen to “the evil reports” who believe the evil reports, who get swept up in the hysteria and sacrifice their Ruach HaKodesh their divine spirit in exchange for idolatry. 

          No, the idol need not be a statue. Any cult of personality is idolatrous. The sin of the spies was twofold. First were the spies. Their sin was to tell the Big Lie and let the Big Lie fester playing upon the fears of the people. The second sin of the spies was the people’s willingness to give up on Moshe, to want another leader. A leader that would tell them what they wanted to hear, a leader that would placate them, a leader that would have been idolized. In a sense, the people were not only willing to replace Moshe but they were willing to replace God. The Big Lie, the evil report offered by the ten spies, teaches us that, ultimately, the choice to listen to and accept a “big lie” is up to the listener. If the listener’s faith in social institutions, authority, society, is already diminished then that listener is vulnerable and the prime target of a big lie. For B’nai Yisroel, it will take 40 years to rid itself of the stink of the Big Lie. For the nations that have had to deal with their own “Big Lie”, years are required, before it dissipates.  For Caleb, for Joshua, and ultimately for the generation that was born in the wilderness, the Generation that didn’t know slavery, they were immune to this “Big Lie”.

 Peace,
Rav Yitz