With Its Words Of A Life That Could Almost Be True (John Barlow & Bob Weir- "Black Throated Wind")

          One of the voices of my childhood passed away this week. Vin Sculley, the voice of the Brooklyn and then Los Angeles Dodgers passed away. He was well into his nineties. He was the voice of the Dodgers for 67 years. When I was a little boy, during baseball season I used to listen to the games on my transistor radio. I only listened at night, and only after my parents “tucked me in” for the night. On a clear night, growing up in upstate New York, I could hear radio broadcasts from the northeast including Boston and  New York, and as far west as Chicago. I could get games from as far north as Montreal and as far south as Baltimore. Because I was a Yankees fan, I grew up listening to the radio broadcasters of the 1970s. However, on an especially clear night, if the Dodgers happen to be playing the Chicago Cubs or the New York Mets, or the Montreal Expos, I would hear Vin Sculley. No, I did not like the Dodgers, I grew up a Yankees fan, and continue to be a Yankees fan. However, when I heard Vin Sculley speak when I heard his “folksy” description of the field, the crowd, the batter, the pitch, and the way he suggested "to pull up a chair”, allowed me to see the game while I listened on my transistor radio. Through the use of spoken language, he painted a glorious picture and I didn’t even like the team! 

          This week’s Parsha is Devarim, which is the first Parsha of the Book of Deuteronomy or Sefer Devarim. Moshe recounts in very wide brushstrokes, the experience of the generation that fled Egypt. Very few details are given. In fact, Moshe begins the story at the foot of Sinai; however, the name is changed from Sinai to Horev. In his recounting, Moshe speaks as a participant in this national experience not in the third person, as was presented in the Books of Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers. This is quite different from the Moshe we have seen. Until now he spoke as a prophet. God spoke to him and he spoke to B'nai Yisroel. Now Moshe displays a certain amount of freedom as he shares the experiences of the past from his perspective. Parsha Devarim is the introductory Parsha to Moshe’s formal teaching of the Torah to this new generation. Moshe begins with a history lesson beginning with the most recent events and working backward to the Exodus. Moshe Rabeinu, now only a few weeks from the moment of his death, imparts his teaching and his wisdom upon B’nai Yisroel like a dying grandparent or parent would to his/her children.  This re-telling or repetition of history and laws to a new generation inspired the Talmudic Sages to call Sefer Devarim (The Book of Words- Deuteronomy) the Mishnah Torah or the repetition of the Torah.

            Both the Parsha and the Book of Devarim begin with a narrative statement.  Eilah HaDevarim Asher Diber Moshe El B’nai Yisroel B’Eiver Yarden-These are the words that Moshe spoke to all of Israel, on the other side of the Jordan…(Deut. 1:1) For the next 5 verses, the Torah’s text is in the third person narrative form in which a time and place are clarified. Finally, beginning with verse 6, the third person narrative shifts to Moshe’s words.  What follows in Moshe's teaching and Moshe’s repetition of the Torah embodies tradition. Moshe’s teaching and his repetition of the Torah, exemplify every parent’s responsibility to strengthen the child’s connection to Judaism, to Torah, and to God. Why do we need to be told that for five verses, Moses’ words will be arriving shortly? Since there are no wasted words in Torah, why don’t the words Eilah Devarim appear immediately before Moshe begins speaking? The Or HaChaim, Chaim Ibn Attar (1696-1743), was a leading Moroccan Rabbinic Commentator of his day, explained that the word Eilah implies “only” and is therefore restrictive and separates that which came before from that which follows. The words that came before this are God’s words and the words that follow  Eilah (These) are Moshe’s words spoken of his own volition.  Citing the Talmud in Tractate Megillah 31, we are reminded that Moshe personally recorded the curses and admonitions in this book and even the legislation which he repeats he does so voluntarily; not because he was commanded to do so.  The first five narrative verses clarify time and space as Moshe’s words are about to follow because we might conclude that just as Moshe felt free to say what he wants here in Devarim, he might have felt free to say what he wanted in the previous books of the Torah. “Only these words” that Moshe spoke of his own volition. Here was Moshe Rabeinu, the elder statesman, the individual that unquestionably had a close relationship with God, speaking before the younger generation. He speaks to them about their connection to their past, he speaks to them about their ancestors, their heroic deeds, and their backsliding. He speaks to them about a covenant, he speaks to them about inheriting the land of Canaan.  Moshe begins the process, with his words, to connect the present generation to past generations and to connect this present generation to the original covenant that God made with the Patriarchs, Moshe, and B’nai Yisroel at Sinai.

  The Torah constantly reminds us of the Holiness of words. After all, the Torah begins with a narrative of God engaging in the creative process. It is the only moment where God is alone, and not dealing with human beings. At that moment when God is alone and creating, God does so through speech. As the Sefer Bemidbar, the Book of Numbers concluded, Moseh taught Bnai Yisroel the sanctity of “vows and oaths” (Num.30:2-17) In Sefer VaYikra, we learned that spiritual impurity is a function of “gossip” or “impure speech” (Lev. 14:1-20). In Sefer Shmot, when the Ten Commandments are given, one had to do with “bearing false witness” ( Ex.20:13). Words are, perhaps, the one activity that comes closest to engaging in a Godly, or holy activity. Words can bring a community together and words can be used to so division and hatred. Words can create a common shared experience and common purpose. All of “these words” can transcend differences and make individuals part of something much bigger and more meaningful. Sometimes “all these words” can allow a little boy to close his eyes and see the exact same thing as millions of others who are listening to the same broadcast. 

Peace,
Rav Yitz

And It Speaks Of A Life That Passes Like Dew (John Barlow & Bob Weir- "Black Throated Wind")

           My wife is from California, and she has family in Los Angeles and San Francisco. So I read about environmental issues faced by the West with a bit of personal interest. At the end of August, there was a troubling article in the New York Times about the drying up of the Colorado River. The Colorado River supplies approximately 40 million people with water. My wife is from California. Lake Meade, the largest man-made reservoir, and the Hoover Dam are part of the infrastructure dating back from 1930 that regulates the supply of water for California, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico. The reservoir has not been completely filled since 1983. California has been experiencing a drought for the past several years. While California has done yeoman’s work to conserve water, drought has taken its toll. It is dry, it is parched. Several years of above-normal rainfall would be required to alleviate the drought.  Such torrential rains have occurred exactly three times over the past 135 years.   California’s current fires have burned a total acreage the size of New Jersey or the size of Israel. Eventually, the fires will be brought under control, but the drought conditions will continue. The dire need for precipitation will remain.

          This Shabbat, we read Parshat Ha’Azinu. Parshat Ha’Azinu was the “song” or the “Poem” that God had commanded Moshe to compose in the previous Parsha VaYeilech.  The content of this “song” is not very cheerful. Moshe invokes the heavens and the earth to witness these words that he gives to B’nai Yisroel. Moshe reminds B’nai Yisroel of their covenant with God. Moshe reminds B’nai Yisroel of their spiritual shortcomings and the ensuing punishment. He reminded B'nai Yisroel that despite all of these shortcomings, despite the idolatry, despite wavering from the covenant, we can still engage in T’shuvah, we can still return to God and know that God will welcome us back.

          In the poem, during the introduction, Moshe not only invokes Heaven to listen to these words as a testament to the prophecy offered to his people, but Moshe also hopes Ya’Arof KaMatar Likchi Tizal Katal Imrati Kisirim Alei Desheh Uch’revivim Aley Eisev – May my teaching drop like the rain, may my utterance flow like the dew; like storm winds upon vegetation and like raindrops upon blades of grass (Deut. 32:2). The word “teachings” in this verse comes from the verb LaKaCh or Take. The idea, of course, is a two-way street. Moshe’s words, his wisdom his teachings are offered to B'nai Yisroel. Moshe offers his teachings as a source of spiritual nourishment. His words, like water, are a life-sustaining force. The other half of the equation, of course, is B’nai Yisroel. B’nai Yisroel must drink in the teaching,  they must "take in" the words of wisdom, the nourishment, and the water that Moshe continues to provide up until his death, and make it part of their lives. When rain falls and it is not absorbed it pools together it forms a puddle. However, when water is absorbed, it nourishes, it maintains life it sustains vegetation, and it sustains our physical existence. Moshe’s words, in fact, all the words of the book of Deuteronomy are Moshe’s words. Moshe makes his final plea to B’nai Yisroel to listen to the wise words of an old and dying man. Moshe makes a final plea to B'nai Yisroel to “take” his words to heart, to drink them in, and incorporate them into life. For the Rabbis, a draught was not only a physical condition due to lack of water. A draught was a spiritual condition caused by a lack of Torah. After all, Torah is alluded to as “Mayim Chayim” living waters. Rain is categorized as Mayim Chaim. Mayim Chayim sustains physical life as well as spiritual life. Torah sustains our spiritual life.

          Moshe makes his last plea prior to his death. Like the land can be subjected to drought; so it is with the Jewish People. Without our “water supply”, without our heavenly rains, and gentle dew, we can suffer through spiritual drought, our souls dry up and we became empty. Torah, like the rain, comes from the heavens. From Moshe’s perspective, it is a limitless supply of spiritual Mayim Chayim, Living Waters. We need only study it, learn it, incorporate it into our lives and we will have a limitless supply of spiritual water, water that nourishes our soul, allowing it to grow in holiness.

Peace,  
Rav Yitz

And It Speaks Like A Life That Passes Like Dew

          Over the past two weeks, one nation mourned the loss of its Prince and several days later acknowledge the 95th birthday of its Queen. Another nation, as it does every year, remembered those who gave their lives for their country and the next day celebrated its independence. Our eighteen-year-old daughter has been studying in the latter country, Israel. she called us to describe the moving experience she had while attending a Yom HaZikaron ceremony and Yom Ha’Atzmaut celebration. It is a yearly phenomenon. Yom HaZikaron is otherwise known as Israel’s Remembrance Day or Israel’s Memorial Day. Like Canada, the United States, and nearly every other country, Israel set aside a day in which it remembers its fallen heroes, those who made the ultimate sacrifice, those who gave their lives for their country. Yom Ha'Atzmaut is otherwise known as Israel's Independence Day. Like Canada, the United States, and nearly every other country, Israel set aside a day in which it celebrates its independence. Unlike Canada, the United States, and nearly every other country, only Israel observes and celebrates these Civic holy days consecutively. The juxtaposition between the solemnity of a Remembrance Day and the joy of an Independence Day occurs in the moments between  Mincha/ The Afternoon prayer service, as Yom HaZikaron (Remembrance Day) concludes, and Maariv/The Evening Service,  as Yom Ha’Atzmaut (Independence Day) commences. As Yom Ha’Zikaron drew to a conclusion, our daughter and her classmates attended a special ceremony which included the Mincha service a candle lighting ceremony, mourner’s Kaddish, a moment of silence, and the sounding of a siren. With that, Yom HaZikaron concluded and a new day began. Moments later, our daughter and her classmates now participated in a special Maariv service full of singing, and dancing that marked the celebration of Yom Ha’Atzmaut. 

          This Shabbat, like last Shabbat, we read two Parshiot. This week we read the double Parsha of  Acharei Mot/ Kedoshim. The two previous Parshiot, Tazria, and Metzorah, essentially interrupted the narrative and the laws that had been focused upon the Kohanim. In Acharei Mot/Kedoshim, we now return to the Kohen as the central focus in the Parsha. Now that he has become spiritually pure, the Torah is now ready to teach the laws for the spiritual purity of the nation. We have focused upon the impurities of individuals, now we focus upon the community. The Kohen acts on behalf of the nation just like he acts on behalf of the individual. The Torah teaches the laws for the offerings of Yom Kippur, national atonement, and Azazel otherwise known as the Scapegoat. The Scapegoat is not offered as a sacrifice to God, but rather is sent out from the camp and left to wander in the wilderness, eventually succumbing to the elements. The second half of the Parsha focuses upon the holy and unholy relationships within the family. It is interesting to note that the list of immoral behaviors between family members is taught within the context of other nations. Also, the list of immoral behavior in terms of worship,  labour relations, and the treatment of the vulnerable are all taught within the context of other nations. Essentially other nations offer examples of immoral behavior and immoral societies.

          The paradigms for immoral behavior and immoral societies were Eretz Mitzrayim - Egypt and Eretz Canaan. One was a place of slavery where  B'nai Yisroel's national journey began. The other place was Eretz Canaan; the place where B'nai Yisroel's national journey will eventually conclude. The Torah considers the behaviors of the inhabitants of each place to be impure,  unholy, and an abomination. In both places, Eretz Mitzrayim and Eretz Canaan, the dominant culture worships death and does not sanctify life. Human sacrifices are made, the vulnerable are not taken care of, and there is no mechanism in place for a community to repent, to return to a previous point of spiritual purity and sanctity - T’Shuvah (repentance).  In fact, both places, the place of origin and place of destination are so impure, the abominations are so deplorable that to mimic such behavior is tantamount to spiritual death. Instead, the Torah implores B’nai Yisroel to mimic and imitate God, the embodiment of spiritual purity, holiness, and life. Vi’Heyitem Li Kedoshim Ki Kadosh Ani Adoshem Va’Avdil Etchem Min Ha’Amim Li’heyot Li – You shall be holy for me for I, Hashem, am holy; and I have separated you from the People’s to be mine. (Lev. 20:26). Holiness is the act of sanctifying life. Even if touched by death, as Aharon had been touched by the death of his sons, a person can engage in behaviors that sanctify life. Alternatively, a person could wallow in misery and sadness engage in behavior that demeans or desecrates life allowing his/her own spirit to die.

          Our daughter described the moments between Mincha and Maariv, the moments between the end of one day and the commencement of another day as “stark”. She described the sorrow and sadness of death in one moment and the joyous celebration of life in the next moment.  Only Israel, only Judaism, which marks the end of one day and the beginning of another day with the setting sun,  demonstrates that life and death are inextricably connected. Yes, the memories of those who died, Acharei Mot, after their deaths,  in Israel’s war and victims of terrorism were remembered. Remembering those men, women, and children had a distinct purpose. The purpose was Kedoshim, to make a place holy, and to make a particular time holy. By engaging in the solemnity of remembering, Israelis and those who observe and celebrate with Israel,  celebrated more than Independence. Israel and those who observe and celebrate with Israel celebrated the holiness of life itself. As our daughter and her friends stood in silence, couldn’t help but acknowledge celebrate the miracle that is the State of Israel.

Peace,
Rav Yitz

It Speaks Of A Life That Passes Like Dew (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Black Throated Wind")

           With a daughter spending a gap year learning in Israel, we get phone calls at rather odd times. One of the odd times she decides to call is at the conclusion of Shabbat in Israel. Knowing that she can only leave a message, our daughter will call, inform us of her Shabbat experience. If she was spending Shabbat away from her Seminary, she will call to let us know that she is safely home. If there was important news that occurred late Friday night or on Saturday eastern standard time, she will tell us what we might have missed. Last Shabbat was no different than any other Shabbat since she has been in Israel. While we were eating Shabbat lunch here in Toronto, our daughter called and told us that Joe Biden was now the President-Elect. In our home, we were thankful and hopeful that there might be a new beginning,  as these troubling and chaotic four years draw to an inevitable conclusion. Ten minutes later, that hope, that sense of a new beginning, and new opportunity burst as our daughter called again. This time she called to tell us that Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, the former Chief Rabbi of England, passed away. The Jewish people and indeed the world lost a brilliant intellect, and an empathetic soul,  teacher of Jewish texts, and perhaps the greatest ambassador of Modern Orthodox Judaism,  western morality, ethics, and philosophy. Within ten minutes of our Shabbat lunch, there was life and death, joy and grief, light, and darkness. 

         This Shabbat is Parsha Chayei Sarah. In Chayei Sarah, life and death appear almost simultaneously.  We read of Sarah’s death in terms of life: “Sarah’s lifetime was…” (Gen23:1). Then Avraham prepares for his wife’s burial. Next, Avraham concentrates his focus upon the perpetuation of life. He sends his servant, Eliezer, to find a wife for his son. He sends his servant, Eliezer, to find a matriarch that can fill the void left by Sarah’s death. Rivkah embodied this notion of life and legacy. These qualities are inherent to her character. Rivkah offered water, a symbol of both life and Torah, to Eliezer. Then she offered water to Eliezer’s camels thereby demonstrating her menschlekite. Rivkah also possessed the ability to sustain life. She sustained Eliezer’s life by allowing him to accomplish his mission and return to Avraham with a wife for Yitzchak. She sustained her own life by having the wherewithal and the strength to leave her family, a family which our sages suggest were cutthroats and cheats (Genesis Rabbah 63:4), and join a family that made a covenant with God. Ultimately she brought sustenance and comfort to Yitzchak when they both entered his mother’s tent. 

          After Eliezer received water from this girl, we are told her name, Rivkah. Her name is indicative of her character. Her name also suggests an inherent ability to join seemingly disparate events or ideas such as life and death and make meaning from it. The Hebrew root of her name (RVK) means “join”, or “yoked together”, e.g. two oxen are joined together to pull a plow. The team must be of equal strength or the plow won’t go straight. Therefore Rivkah must be equally as strong as and independent as Yitzchak. Rivkah must be strong enough to take the memory and legacy of Sarah and make it her own. This requires a very strong sense of self.              

Rivkah fills the spiritual vacuum created by Sarah’s death. Rivka will also become  Avraham in the sense that just like God shared with Avraham the prophecy; God will share the prophecy of  Rivkah’s two sons with Rivkah (Parsha Toldot). Like Avraham, Rivka is the bridge between this family’s current state of affairs and future spiritual holiness. “And Yitzchak brought her into the tent of his mother; he married Rivkah, she became his wife, and he loved her; and thus was Yitzchak consoled after his mother.” (Gen 24:67)  The Rabbis explain that while Sarah lived a cloud of glory hung over her tent, her tent was known for hospitality, and a lamp remained alit from Shabbat to Shabbat. When Sarah died all these qualities died with her. However, when Rivkah was brought into the tent of his mother, all these qualities returned (Genesis Rabbah 60:16). Besides perpetuating life, she perpetuated the spiritual holiness necessary for joining Yitzchak in God’s covenant. Only Rivkah was able to fill the powerful memory of Sarah and still prevent herself from being overwhelmed by such a memory, joining the legacy of Sarah to her own being and her marriage to Yitzchak.  Only Rivkah was able to join the generation of Avraham and Sarah with the next generation. Fittingly, the Parshah ends as it began, with death. However, now read of Avraham’s death.  

          Rivkah took the legacy, the Middot, the qualities of the deceased, of Sarah, and (RVK)  joined those qualities, aspects, and Middot to her life. She accomplished this monumental task when she and her husband Yitzchak entered his mother’s tent and she brought him comfort. At that moment Rivkah managed to demonstrate life and death can converge, that joy and sorrow can be linked, that past and present can intersect resulting in something spiritually powerful as opposed to spiritually debilitating.

Peace,

Rav Yitz

The Black Throated Wind Keeps On Pouring In With Its Words Of A Life Where Nothing Is New Ah, Mother American Night, I'm Lost From The Light (John Barlow & Bob Weir- "Black Throated Wind")

           Three ongoing activities have dominated our home this past week. During the day, we take one daughter for her physiotherapy as she rehabs her surgically repaired knee.  We help our youngest daughter get packed and prepared for her gap year in Israel. She leaves next week. After dinner, I sit down and turn on the Democratic National Convention and text with my eldest daughter, a Democratic campaign manager. As I listened to some of the “big names” speak, three of whom my daughter has worked for: Hillary Clinton, Senator Warren, and President Obama, I was struck by a theme that each alluded to and President Obama so eloquently and explicitly pointed out. Speaking from Philadelphia, from the site where the U.S. Constitution was signed, the former president reminded us that the President’s job is to defend the constitution. In order to do that, the President must appreciate the sanctity of the Constitution’s words. the President must understand the meaning of those words. The President must acknowledge that those words are applicable to every American citizen no matter color, gender, religion, voting preference, or ethnic background.  President Obama reminded viewers that the oath of the President is serious, the office weighs heavy and should not be taken lightly nor cavalierly. From President Obama’s perspective, it appeared that the words of the Constitution must be held close to the President’s heart in order for him/her to have the character to fulfill its words.

          This week’s Parsha is Shoftim. Moshe has completed his lecture on the values of monotheism and covenant. Now he begins telling B'nai Yisroel all the nitty-gritty details of living a Jewish life within this community. What a downer! B’nai Yisroel is inspired and ready to enter into Eretz Canaan and begin living the life in the land that God had promised their ancestors. They are now ready to begin fulfilling the dream that allowed them to survive centuries of slavery. So what does Moshe Rabeinu do? He brings them crashing back to reality. Now they will listen and understand laws concerning war, punishments for idolatry, choosing a king, jurisprudence, priestly entitlements, and unsolved murders. Moshe gives B’nai Yisroel a healthy dose of reality by supplying all the details required to uphold the Covenant.

          One of these laws is rather curious yet serves as a reminder of how important it is to maintain a balance between dreams and reality, between the idealism of our youth and the cynicism of age. V’Hayah Ch’shivto Al Kisei Mamlachto V’Chatav Lo Et Mishnei HaTorah Hazot – And it shall be when he sits on the throne of his kingdom, he shall write for himself two copies of this Torah in a book… V’Haitah Imo V’Kara Vo Kol Yemei Chayav Lema’an Yilmad L’yirah et Adonai Elohav – It shall be with him and he shall read from it all the days of his life, so that he will learn to fear the Lord his God, Lishmor et Kol Divrei HaTorah Ha’Zot V’Et HaChukim Ha’Eilah La’Asotam – to observe all the words of this Torah and these decrees, to perform them so that his heart does not become haughty over his brethren and not turn from the commandment right or left so that he will prolong years over his kingdom, he and his sons amid Israel (Deut. 18:18-20). The king must write and maintain two Sifrei Torah. The “personal” Torah must be carried with him wherever he goes: meetings, wars, benefit dinners, etc. The Torah must always remain physically near his heart. However, the second Sefer Torah sits in the treasure room as a pristine copy, as a benchmark. This “benchmark” Torah remains enclosed, protected, and untouched. The king may consult it, but this pristine copy never leaves the sanctuary. How brilliant! The “personal” Torah that is carried around eventually becomes worn, the letters fade, and the parchment may even tear. This would most likely occur unbeknownst to the king. Yearly, the king must lay his “personal” Torah besides the “benchmark” Torah. There, in the inner chamber, the two Torahs are checked against each other. Then if there are any discrepancies in the “Personal” Torah, the king must make the necessary corrections. The king’s “personal” Torah must reflect the purest and highest standard. Through daily wear and tear, through the compromises necessary to manage a kingdom, the king must regularly check to make sure that he has not gradually drifted away from the “Pristine” or “Benchmark” Torah.

          This is the ultimate form of personal “Checks and Balances”. Instead of living a life based upon “how much can I get away with”, “What am I entitled to”, “how can I enrich myself”, Judaism reminds the leader that there is a code by which life must be lived.  Judaism understands that we all make compromises. Sometimes we may even, unfortunately, compromise our integrity our values, and our own sense of propriety. Sometimes our drift from the ideal is not even that pernicious. Sometimes we just slowdown or get sidetracked. However, Judaism is about behavior that expresses our relationship with each other and with God. Like a king that needs to periodically check the “personal Torah” against the “Benchmark Torah”, we also must check our “Personal Torah” against the “Benchmark Torah”. Certainly, the process may be uncomfortable, and yes, there is the danger of becoming so self-absorbed that we become paralyzed. The process occurs on a regular enough basis that we don’t become too paralyzed that we can’t function. However, what is so empowering is that this “personal Torah” is not confined to the King. In this regard, we are all kings, we are all royalty. We are all better off making sure that our “personal Torah”, the one we carry with us wherever we go matches up with Torah, the Torah that we learn from, the Torah that we read upon Shabbat and Holidays. As we have just started the month of Elul, this notion of self-reflection is even more important. Yet as former President Obama explained, a successful President keeps the Constitution’s words close and every decision must be based upon defending and living by those words. It requires self-reflection, honesty, integrity, and moral character. Funny, these are the same qualities that we try to instill in our children.

Peace

Rav Yitz

With Its Words Of A Life That Could Almost Be True (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Black Throated Wind")

Our nineteen-year-old daughter was confronted with a conflict while working as a camp counselor. Camp is scheduled to end two days before she needs to be at her university dormitory in New York City. She needed a week at home in Toronto before heading down to University. So she arranged with the camp to that she would leave four or five days prior to the official conclusion of camp. She and the camp agreed and signed a contract.  When I went to visit her, my wife and our two other children last week, she and I spoke about her early departure. She explained that she felt conflicted because originally she wanted to leave a week before the official conclusion of camp and the camp ‘s original position was that leaving early was unnecessary. Both sides compromised on four days.  As we spoke and she shared with me her frustration, I suggested that she speak to her boss, request an earlier departure date and simultaneously offer to forego being paid the last week. I thought my suggestion was completely reasonable. She gave me a look of shock and incredulity. Then she stated, “I have a contract, I gave my word”.

This Shabbat, we read from the final two Parshiot in Sefer Bemidbar (Book of Numbers): Matot and Masei.  This double Parsha begins with the laws of Nedarim (Vows), and then Bnai Yisroel fights against the Midianites. Moshe rebukes his officers for their collective failure to deal with the Midianite woman since they were the cause of Bnai Yisroel’s plague in the first place. Bnai Yisroel then begins the process of dividing the spoils of this battle. Two tribes, Reuben and Gad request to settle in the land east of the Jordan River and not the land promised by Hashem. Moshe expresses his anger over the request and the two tribes amend their request. Moshe adds a condition and an agreement is reached. The Torah recounts the various stops that Bnai Yisroel made on their journey to Eretz Canaan, the boundaries of Eretz Canaan are clarified, the new leadership is introduced and the cities of refuge of explained and established. Finally, Sefer Bemidbar concludes with a reminder of the laws for tribal inheritance. With all those loose ends neatly sewn up; Bnai Yisroel now sits on the eastern bank of the Jordan River waiting to enter Eretz Canaan. As we conclude the reading, we say Chazak Chazak v’ NitChazeik – From strength to strength we shall go forward in strength.

The beginning of the Parsha, with its focus upon Nedarim v’Shvuot Vows and Oaths, we are being reminded of two vital concepts. First, we are reminded of the Aseret Dibrot, of the Ten Commandments and specifically invoking God’s name in vain.  Ish Ki Yidor Neder L’adoshem When a man takes a vow to Hashem (Num. 30:3). Part of the process by which one makes a vow is to invoke God name. Therefore, a failure to keep the vow or the oath means that one has used God’s name in vain. The repercussions of which are extremely serious.  Second, we learned in Sefer Breishit (Book of Genesis) that speech is holy. Speech is part of the God’s creative process; Vayomer Elokim, Yehi Or, VaYahi Or- And God said: Let there be Light, and there was light. In a sense, speech is perhaps one of the only actions available to us that allow us to emulate God. When we make a vow or an oath, we are acting similar to God. A Neder is a pledge to prohibit oneself from something that that the Torah permits. Or a Neder can be obligating oneself to something that the Torah considers to be optional. Obligating one’s self to contribute to a specific charity would be an example of "obligating that which is optional". Refraining from apples would be an example of prohibiting something that is originally acceptable. In either case, the individual is truly acting like God. The individual is creating Halacha and making his vow and or oath becomes tantamount to Torah. Clearly, this cannot be taken lightly. After all, the severity of the language is a function of the fact that one makes this vow, pledge or oath to God and not to oneself or to another.  Fundamental to our vows with God is a trust in the relationship, trust that it exists, trust that it is desired by both and trust that is must be treated as sacred.

Indeed, my daughter made gave her word regarding her early departure from camp. Yes, she complained. Yes, she shared her anxiety as she wondered how everything would get done before her leaving for university. Yes, she was certainly shocked when I suggested that she calmly and reasonably offer to give up a week of pay in order to leave earlier than the time that had been agreed upon. All that time, as I listened to her, and made suggestions, I thought I was listening to my little girl. After she incredulously told me that she gave me her word and signed a contract’ my little girl reminded me that her mother and I spent the last nineteen years raising her to be a woman that kept her word.  I guess she is our little girl isn’t so little anymore. Indeed, she is a woman of her word.  

Peace,

Rav Yitz  

Mother American Night, Here Comes The Light (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Black Throated Wind")

Both Canada and the United States celebrated this week. On Monday, Canada celebrated The Articles Confederation and its 152^nd birthday. On Thursday, the United States celebrated the ratification of the Declaration of Independence and its 243^rd birthday. Both the days were marked by people enjoying beautiful summer weather, barbeque, baseball, and fireworks. Both countries are a testament to the sanctity of democracy, a free press, and safeguards to prevent tyranny.  Regarding democracy, Sandra Day O’Connor, the first female Supreme Court Justice of the United States commented: “The freedom to criticize Judges and other public officials is necessary for a vibrant democracy.” In parliamentary governments such as England and Canada, we are able to routinely watch the Prime Minister walk into Parliament and be routinely criticized.  In the United States, political satire and the press that assumes the mantle of criticism. The criticism, is of course, a means by which the executive branch is held accountable, apologizes if necessary, and improves.

This week we read from Parsha Korach. This week's Parsha is Korach. Korach was a relative of Moshe's. They both came from the tribe of Levi. Korach questioned Moshe's authority. He did not do this during a private meeting between individuals. Rather, Korach gathered 250 supporters, and then publicly challenged Moshe. Moshe tried to keep peace within the community but to no avail. A divine test is administered, and Korach and his supporters fail. The earth swallows them up. However, God is angry and a plague falls upon the people. They are communally punished for Korach's actions, their passive support, and their failure to bond together against Korach. Yet the people are still not convinced that Moshe and Aharon should remain in charge, only that Korach was unworthy. So a second divine test is administered this time with 12 rods stuck in the ground and almond branches resulting in Aaron’s staff, thus symbolizing that God has chosen Aharon to be the Kohen Gadol.  The Parsha concludes with God speaking to Aharon and re-iterating his obligations in terms of the Mishkan, the Altar, and the Tent of the Meeting.

Clearly, the most poignant moment in the narrative is the confrontation between Korach, Datan and Aviram, and all their followers with Moshe and Aaron. After witnessing Miriam becoming a leper for speaking against Moshe (Parsha B’Halotcha), after witnessing God’s anger and Moshe’s defense of the people in Parsha B’Halotcha and Shlach Lecha, the rebellion is very troubling. Moshe is shocked by it. He is hurt by it. The fact that he didn’t want the job in the first place, the fact that he went to bat for his flock time after time, leaves Moshe questioning his purpose.  Vayishmah Moshe Vayipol Al Panav – Moshe heard [the complaints] and fell on his face (Num 16:4).  Why did Moshe fall on his face? The Medieval commentators offer a variety of explanations.  Chizkuni, the 13th-century French commentator explains “Moshe fell to the ground in humiliation [at Korach accusation]. Rashi, the 11th-century French commentator explains that “Moshe fell in despair, he felt powerless to appeal to God for the fourth time. He defended the people after the Golden Calf, when they complained for no good reason, and when they heeded the spies. There is an enormous difference between falling due to humiliation or public embarrassment and falling down upon the ground due to despair and the knowledge that one his helpless to fix a bad situation. Soon after he falls to the ground, he figures out, along with God’s help, how to solve the problem and consolidate his authority. Just as important, the people learn the lesson about following the emptiness of cynical self-centered leadership.

However, in the context of Canada Day, Independence Day and the celebration of the success of liberal democracy, Parsha Korach teaches us something about leadership. Perhaps it is a lesson or an indication that democracy is vibrant and successful. Not only is a democracy’s vibrancy based upon the peoples’ ability to criticize the various branches of government, but the target of criticism, when necessary must be able to apologize. When leaders fail to apologize or avoid apologizing, they may think that doing so diminishes their power or that they are not answerable to governed. Let those leaders take a less from Moshe Rabeinu.  Not only did he apologize in a heartfelt manner that was full of remorse and integrity, but he consolidated his power and demonstrated greater humanity and approachability. Both qualities are necessary for successful leadership.

So I Give You My Eyes, And All Of Their Lies Please Help Them To Learn As Well As To See ( John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Black Throated Wind")

Camp has started. Our 18 year old began her staff week late last week. My wife left for camp on Sunday and I dropped off our son this past Tuesday. A friend of mine, a self-identified Orthodox Jew and avid supporter of Israel, and I chatted for a few moments at the camp before I left. He mentioned that he has participated in the recent protests out the offices of the OU. I asked why he was protesting.  He explained that he felt that the OU had sold their soul to a corrupt administration in order to for support for Israel. He explained that the OU should be a little more judicious in their praise of leaders and that support and praise must be based upon something more than just support for Israel. He went on to say that in the long run, he worried that support from divisive leaders, is bad for Israel and bad for the Jews. He worried that Israel has become a partisan issue.  We spoke for a few more minutes and he explained that many in his community share a similar perspective. While support for Israel (the message) matters,  so does the messenger. 

This Shabbat we read from Parsha Balak. Balak was a King of Moab. He heard of Bnai Yisroel’s most recent victory against the Amorites and he understood that fighting Bnai Yisroel would mean certain defeat.  Balak decided that invoking God and cursing Bnai Yisroel would be a better way of defeating Bnai Yisroel. So Balak hired a prophet named Balaam to curse Bnai Yisroel. Balak paid a large sum for Balaam’s curse. However try as he might, Balaam was unable to curse Bnai Yisroel. Since Balaam's donkey wouldn't even move, Balaam could not even get close enough to issue a curse. Finally, when Balaam actually drew near enough, made the necessary offerings and then tried to curse Bnai Yisroel, only Brachot (blessings) came out of his mouth.  The Parsha concludes with Bnai Yisroel encamped on the Eastern side of the Jordan River on the plains of Moab and Balak thinking of another way to weaken Bnai Yisroel. He had the Moabite women to seduce the men of Bnai Yisroel. Once seduced, the men would start engaging in idolatry and the result was God grew angry with Bnai Yisroel and indeed, they were punished with a horrible plague. Only Pinchas’s (Aharon's grandson) vigilance stopped the plague.

Two questions we taught our children to ask are questions that the Jewish people have always asked. Is it good for the Jews? Is it good for Israel? The Talmudic Rabbis have great difficulty in answering these age-old question regarding Bilaam, the Prophet for hire that was supposed to curse Israel but blessed Israel instead. Some of the Midrashim (Rabbinic comments) compare Bilaam to Abraham Moses and Jacob as a non-Jewish alternative (Sifre, Zot HaBracha section 16). However in the Targum Yonatan in the Jerusalem Talmud and Rashi’s comment in Sanhedrin 105a refers to a tradition of comparing Bilaam to Laban. According to the Midrash in Breishit Rabbah God spoke to both Laban and Bilaam in the evening. Both Laban and Bilaam misuse their words.  Laban hoodwinked and tricked Jacob into working for him as an indentured servant form nearly two decades. The Passover Hagaddah tells us that Laban wanted to uproot everything simply by keeping Jacob near him rather than leaving and becoming independent. Had Jacob and the children (Laban’s grandchildren) remained with Laban, then Israel would have been subsumed by Laban’s tribe. Bilaam also wants to destroy Israel. He tries to curse B’nai Yisroel on numerous occasions only to utter an incredibly beautiful blessing: Mah Tovu Ohalecha Yaakov (How Goodly Are Your Tents O’ Jacob…) However it is also Bilaam who noticing the morality and the purity of B’nai Yisroel’s camp (Rashi’s comment in Num.24:5); called on King Balak to send the Moabite and Midianite daughters to seduce the men of Israel both sexually and religiously: VaTikrena L’Am L’Zivchei Eloheihen VaYochal Ha’Am VaYishtachu L’Eloheihen - They (the daughters of Moab and Midian) invited the people (B’nai Yisroel) to the feasts of their gods; the people ate and prostrated themselves to their (the Moabite and Midianite Gods). Israel was threatened both physically and spiritually, first with food and drink, and then by worshipping Baal Peor. By creating and initiating this plan designed to get the Jews to assimilate, some Rabbinic Sages consider Bilaam to be even more evil and more dangerous than Laban.

I wished my friend a good summer hoping he enjoyed his work at the camp and looked forward to seeing him when I pick up our kids. I drove off wondering about the conversation with my Orthodox Jewish friend, I wondered about his community. I wondered if supporting Israel is enough or do I need to also worry about all those messengers, the type of people that support Israel. When I returned, I sent my friend an email asking him what message did the protesters want to convey.  My friend responded by telling me that those who protest outside the OU offices, those who participate in the Protest Mincha outside the OU offices are reminding Jewish Leadership that it in this complex, politicized era, we need to pay attention to the messenger as well as the message then evaluate whether the messenger is good for Israel and the Jews. I was re-assured that like the Sages, we need to continue asking the same questions.

Peace,

Rav Yitz

With Its Words Of A Life That Could Almost Be True (John Barlow & Bob Weir - "Black Throated Wind")

An incredibly powerful and teachable moment came and went this week in, of all places, West Virginia. West Virginia was the sight of the Boy Scouts quadrennial jamboree. In the past, it is been an opportunity for the Presidents to speak to 40,000 boys (all of whom are below the voting age) to speak to young people about the importance of civic responsibility, the role of Boy Scouts in developing boys to become good citizens, and affording these boys a common bond that transcends regional, ethnic, cultural and socio economic positions. For the past 80 years it has been an opportunity for leaders to transcend politics, transcend partisanship, and offer words that inspire, educate and guide a future generation towards the importance of law, country and responsibility. Needless to say, parents of boy scouts were not very pleased by the words spoken earlier this week. Rather than words that inspired, educated, and gave powerful meaning to the role of the Boy Scouts as vital part of the fabric of civil behavior, rather than hear words about the importance of what the Boy Scouts were doing at the Jamboree, they listened to leader of the free world talk about himself, his election victory, and the lack of loyalty in his cabinet. Words that were supposed to be for the Boy Scouts, became words about and for the President.

This week’s Parsha is Devarim, which is the first Parsha of the Book of Deuteronomy or Sefer Devarim. Moshe recounts in very wide brushstrokes, the experience of the generation that fled Egypt. Very few details are given. In fact Moshe begins the story at the foot of Sinai; however, the name is changed from Sinai to Horev. In his recounting, Moshe speaks as a participant in this national experience not in the third person, as was presented in the Books of Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers. This is quite different from the Moshe we have seen. Until now he spoke as a prophet. God spoke to him and he spoke to B'nai Yisroel. Now Moshe displays a certain amount of freedom as he shares the experiences of past from his perspective. Parsha Devarim is the introductory Parsha to Moshe’s formal teaching of the Torah to this new generation. Moshe begins with a history lesson beginning with the most recent events and working backwards to the Exodus. Moshe Rabeinu, now only a few weeks from the moment of his death, imparts his teaching and his wisdom upon B’nai Yisroel like a dying grandparent or parent would to his/her children.  This re-telling or repetition of history and laws to a new generation inspired the Talmudic Sages to call Sefer Devarim (The Book of Words- Deuteronomy) the Mishnah Torah or the repetition of the Torah.

The Parsha, and the Book of Devarim begins with a narrative statement.  Eilah HaDevarim Asher Diber Moshe El B’nai Yisroel B’Eiver Yarden-These are the words that Moshe Spoke to all Israel, on the other side of the Jordan…(Deut. 1:1) For the next 5 versus, the Torah’s text is in the third person narrative form in which a time and place are clarified. Finally, beginning with verse 6, the third person narrative shifts to Moshe’s words.  What follows in Moshe's teaching and Moshe’s repetition of the Torah embodies tradition. Moshe’s teaching and his repetition of the Torah, exemplifies every parent’s responsibility to strengthen the child’s connection to Judaism, to Torah, and to God. Why do we need to be told that for five verses, Moses’ words will be arriving shortly? Since there are no wasted words in Torah, why don’t the words Eilah Devarim appear immediately before Moshe begins speaking? The Or HaChaim, Chaim Ibn Attar (1696-1743), was a leading Moroccan Rabbinic Commentator of his day, explained that the word Eilah implies “only” and is therefore restrictive and separates that which came before from that which follows. The words that came before this are God’s the words that follow this Eilah are Moshe’s and are of his own volition.  Citing the Talmud in Tractate Megillah 31, we are reminded that Moshe personally recorded the curses and admonitions in this book and even the legislation which he repeats he does so voluntarily; not because he was commanded to do so.  The first five narrative verses clarify time and space  as Moshe’s words are about to follow because we might conclude that just as Moshe felt free to say what he wants here in Devarim, he might have felt free to say what he wanted in the previous books of the Torah. “Only these words” that Moshe spoke of his own volition. Here was Moshe Rabeinu, the elder statesman, the individual that unquestionably had the closes relationship with God, speaking before the younger generation. He speaks to them about their connection to their past, he speaks to them about their ancestors, their heroic deeds and their backsliding. He speaks to them about a covenant, he speaks to them about the inheriting the land of Canaan.  Moshe begins the process, with his words, to connect the present generation to past generations and to connect this present generation to the original covenant that God made with the Patriarchs, Moshe, and B’nai Yisroel at Sinai.

One of the roles of leadership is to speak to people in a way that binds the people and the community together. They can be bound together through a common experience (either positive or negative), a shared history, or a common purpose. All of “these words” would transcend differences and make individuals part of something much bigger and more meaningful. So when a leader is afforded the opportunity to present Eilah HaDevarim only these words to young people that could inspire, educate and motivate and instead uses “Eilah HaDevarim” only these words; words about himself and serve himself. Such a lost opportunity teaches us the power and the importance of words.

Peace,

Rav Yitz

And It Speaks Of A LifeThat Passes Like Dew (John Barlow & Bob Weir -"Black Throated Wind")

          Earlier this week, our sixteen year old daughter was given the honour to light a candle during the B’nei Akiva Yom HaZikoron Commemoration Ceremony.  Yom HaZikaron, is otherwise known as Israel’s Remembrance Day or  Memorial Day. Every country sets aside a day to remember its fallen heroes, those who gave their life for their country. In a sense, every country recognizes that it has been touched by death. In Canada, in November there is Remembrance Day, to commemorate those soldiers that died in WWI. In the United States, at the end of May there is Memorial Day, a day set aside to remember those soldiers who died in the Civil War. In November there is Veterans Day, a day set aside to remember those soldiers who died in WWI. Our daughter, along with several other young honorees, lit candles immediately prior to Mincha Service, the Afternoon prayer service,  which is the final of  three daily prayer services. After a few speeches,  Maariv, The Evening service, which is the first of the three daily prayer services began. With the recitation of Maariv a new day commenced. However this was no ordinary transition from one day to the next. Immediately following the solemnity of Yom HaZikaron,  new day began and with it began the celebration of Yom Ha'Atzmaut- Israel’s Independence Day. Of course every country sets a day in which it celebrates its national birth, a day in which a nation appeals to the sanctity and purity associated by birth and the ideals upon which that nation began. Canada celebrates Dominion Day on July 1, and The United States celebrates Independence Day on July 4^th. Usually the "Memorial Day" and "Independence Day" are separated by several months. Only Israel and the Jewish people acknowledge that death and life are intimately bound and usually only separated by the smallest to margins, the blink of an eye, a few minutes, or the separation between Mincha and Maariv.

This Shabbat, like last Shabbat, we read from two Parshiot. This week we read the double Parsha of  Acharei Mot/ Kedoshim. After two Parshiot, Tazria and Metzorah, which essentially interrupted the narrative and the laws that had been focused upon the Kohanim, we now return to the Kohen as the central focus in the Parsha. Now that he has become spiritually pure, the Torah is now ready to teach the laws for the spiritual purity of the nation. We have focused upon the impurities of individuals, now we focus upon the community. The Kohen acts on behalf of the nation just like he acts on behalf of the individual. The Torah teaches us the laws for the offerings of Yom Kippur, national atonement, and Azazel otherwise known as the Scapegoat. The Scapegoat is not offered as a sacrifice to God, but rather is sent out from the camp and left to wander in the wilderness eventually succumbing to the elements. The second half of the Parsha focuses upon the holy and holy relationships within the family. However the list of inappropriate behaviors between family members is taught within the context of the other nations. The list of inappropriate behavior in terms of worship, in terms of caring for the employer and employee, between the vulnerable and the well-off, between people are all taught within the context of other nations. Essentially other nations provide a standard of inappropriate behavior.

However it is somewhat odd that the standards for inappropriate behavior come from two distinct places. One place is Egypt; the place where this journey began. The other place is Eretz Canaan; the place where this journey is supposed to conclude. The Torah considers both places impure, and unholy. Both places engage in behavior that Torah considers to be bad,  in fact the Torah refers to this "bad behaviour" as "abominations". In both places, Egypt and Canaan, the dominant culture worships death, and does not sanctify life. Human sacrifices are made, the vulnerable are not taken care of, and there is no mechanism in place for a community to ever return to a previous point of spiritual purity and sanctity – T’Shuvah (repentance).  In fact both places, the place of origin and place of destination are so impure, the abominations are so deplorable, that to mimic such behavior is tantamount to a spiritual death. The only example, the only other third party "being" to mimic and to imitate behavior is God. Vi’Heyitem Li Kedoshim Ki Kadosh Ani Adoshem Va’Avdil Etchem Min Ha’Amim Li’heyot Li – You shall be holy for me for I, Hashem, am holy; and I have separated you from the People’s to be mine.(Lev. 20:26). Holiness is the act of sanctifying life. Even if touched by death, as Aharon had been touched by the death of his sons, a person can sanctify life or wallow in the misery and sadness and allow his/.her own spirit to die.

The idea that in one evening separated by a few minutes, Jewish communities in Israel and outside of Israel, Jewish communities that were celebrating Yom Hazikaron (Israel’s Memorial Day) and Yom Ha’Atzmaut (Israel’s Independence Day) were ultimately sanctify life. Yes the memory of those who died in Israel’s’ war and were victims of terrorism were remembered, however those memories had a distinct purpose. Those memories helped Israel and all who celebrate with Israel to celebrate its life, its birth, and the pure ideals upon which it was established, a Jewish State built upon democracy. Watching our daughter light that commemorative candle, I couldn't help but think about the fragility of life, and  the limited time we have to lead a purpose driven life. As our daughter lit that candle commemorating death, I couldn't help but think that the only way to make any death meaningful is to celebrate life. Watching our daughter light that candle commemorating death, my wife and I couldn’t help but acknowledge and anticipate the celebration of the miracle that is State of Israel.

Peace,

Rav Yitz